Skip to main content

Clash of Integration Frames

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Conceptualisation of Integration

Part of the book series: Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series ((CAL))

  • 189 Accesses

Abstract

The concept of immigrant integration has been defined by multiple constituent actors such as academics, host communities, media and governments. This chapter engages in an integrated analysis and discussion of the findings of both the thematically varied definitions of integration and the richer cognitive schemas and frames of integration provided by Muslim participants of this research. This chapter reveals an emerging clash of integration frames between immigrant integration stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdalla, M. (2012). Sacred law in secular land: To what extent should Sharia law be followed in Australia? The Griffith Law Review, 21(3), 657–679.

    Google Scholar 

  • Akbari, A. H., & MacDonald, M. (2014). Immigration policy in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: An overview of recent trends. International Migration Review, 48(3), 801–822.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arai, M., Karlsson, J., & Lundholm, M. (2011). On fragile grounds: A replication of “Are Muslim immigrants different in terms of cultural integration?” Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5), 1002–1011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertossi, C., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2012). National models of immigrant integration: The costs for comparative research. Comparative European Politics, 10(3), 237–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisin, A., Patacchini, E., Verdier, T., & Zenou, Y. (2011). Ethnic identity and labour market outcomes of immigrants in Europe. Economic Policy, 26(65), 57–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, A. (2008). Accommodating Shariah law in Australia’s legal system. Alternative Law Journal, 33(4), 214–219.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, A., & Abdullah, K. (2011). Good and bad Sharia: Australia’s mixed response to Islamic law. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 34(1), 383.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemraad, I. (2006). Becoming a citizen: Incorporating immigrants and refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley: University of California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloemraad, I. (2012). Understanding “Canadian exceptionalism” in immigration and pluralism policy. In B. Stiftung (Ed.), Rethinking national identity in the age of migration (pp. 145–170). Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bocker, A., & Strik, T. (2011). Language and knowledge tests for permanent residence rights: Help or hindrance for integration. European Journal of Migration & Law, 13, 157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouma, G., Cahill, D., Dellal, H., & Zwartz, A. (2011). Freedom of religion and belief in 21st century Australia. Canberra: Australian Human Rights Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Campomori, F., & Caponio, T. (2013). Competing frames of immigrant integration in the EU: Geographies of social inclusion in Italian regions. Policy Studies, 34(2), 162–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castles, S. (2007). Twenty-first-century migration as a challenge to sociology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(3), 351–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cesari, J. (2007). Muslim identities in Europe: The snare of exceptionalism. In A. Al-Azmeh & E. Fokas (Eds.), Islam in Europe: Diversity, identity and influence (pp. 49–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Leeuw, M., & Van Wichelen, S. (2012). Civilizing migrants: Integration, culture and citizenship. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 195–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, K., Forrest, J., Ip, D., Babacan, H., Paradise, Y., & Pederson, A. (2008). Challenging racism: The anti-racism research project, state-level comparison. In Proceedings of 4Rs Conference: Rights, Reconciliation, Respect, Responsibility (30 September–3 October). Sydney, NSW: University of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/42185/State_level_comparison_for_4Rs_conference.pdf.

  • Eickelman, D. F., & Piscatori, J. (Eds.). (1990). Muslim travelers, migration, and the religious imagination (pp. 3–28). Berkley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmadmad, K. (2008). Asylum in Islam and in modern refugee law. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 27(2), 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Entzinger, H. (2014). The growing gap between facts and discourse on immigrant integration in the Netherlands. Identities, 21(6), 693–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fozdar, F. (2012). Social cohesion and skilled Muslim refugees in Australia employment, social capital and discrimination. Journal of Sociology, 48(2), 167–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, S. W. (2010). Integration requirements for integration’s sake? Identifying, categorising and comparing civic integration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 753–772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harles, J. C. (1997). Integration before assimilation: Immigration, multiculturalism and the Canadian polity. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 30(4), 711–736.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, R. (2006). Globalisation’s challenge to the Islamic Ummah. Asian Journal of Social Science, 34(2), 311–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckmann, F., & Schnapper, D. (Eds.). (2003). The integration of immigrants in European societies: National differences and trends of convergence (Vol. 7). Stuttgart, DE: Lucius & Lucius.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hollifield, J., Martin, P., & Orrenius, P. (Eds.). (2014). Controlling immigration: A global perspective. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, W. (2003). Religious citizenship. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 49(3), 425–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Husic, E. (2006). Islam and Australia: Can a Muslim get elected to parliament in a war on terror? The Sydney Papers, 18(1), 88–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • International Organisation for Migration (2014). Compendium of migrant integration policies and practices, Retrieved October 22, 2014, from www.iom.int.

  • Jackson, D. (2011). Europe and the migrant experience: Transforming integration. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, 28(1), 14–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joppke, C. (2013). Through the European looking glass: Citizenship tests in the USA, Australia, and Canada. Citizenship Studies, 17(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans, R., Lancee, B., & Schaeffer, M. (Eds.). (2014). Social cohesion and immigration in Europe and North America: Mechanisms, conditions, and causality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kundnani, A. (2012). Multiculturalism and its discontents: Left, right and liberal. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 155–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuran, T., & Sandholm, W. H. (2008). Cultural integration and its discontents. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 201–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. (2011). Multicultural citizenship within multination states. Ethnicities, 11(3), 281–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lahav, G. (2004). Immigration and politics in the new Europe: Reinventing borders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Li, P. S. (2003). Deconstructing Canada’s discourses of immigrant integration. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 4(3), 315–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mac Éinrí, P. (2007). The challenge of migrant integration in Ireland. Evidence from New Countries of Immigration, 9(1), 75–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, A. (2011). Attitudes to multiculturalism and cultural diversity. In M. Clyne & J. Jupp (Eds.), Multiculturalism and integration: A harmonious relationship. Canberra: Australian National University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Markus, A. (2013). Mapping social cohesion 2012: The Scanlon foundation survey. Retrieved from http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/mapping-population/social-cohesion-report.php.

  • Mason, R. (2010). Australian multiculturalism: Revisiting Australia’s political heritage and the migrant presence. History Compass, 8, 817–827.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, M. (2014). Immigrant civic integration and service access initiatives. Access initiative: City sized solution for city-sized needs. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2012). For “Jewish” read “Muslim”? Islamophobia as a form of racialisation of ethno religious groups in Britain today. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 1(1), 36–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, M. C. (2013). Religion, identity and politics in Northern Ireland: Boundaries of belonging and belief. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Modood, T. (2013). Post-immigration ‘difference’ and integration. Meritum, revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC, 8(1), 389–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roggeband, C., & Vliegenthart, R. (2007). Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics, 30(3), 524–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sohrabi, H., & Farquharson, K. (2015). Social integration of Australian Muslims: A dramaturgical perspective. Journal of Sociology, 52(2). doi:1440783314562415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tolsma, J., Lubbers, M., & Gijsberts, M. (2012). Education and cultural integration among ethnic minorities and natives in the Netherlands: A test of the integration paradox. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(5), 793–813.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Noll, J. (2014). Religious toleration of Muslims in the German public sphere. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 60–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wets, J. (2006). The Turkish community in Austria and Belgium: The challenge of integration. Turkish Studies, 7(1), 85–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiesbrock, A. (2011). The integration of immigrants in Sweden: A model for the European union? International Migration, 49(4), 48–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, L., Gataullina, L., Constant, A., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2008). Human capital and ethnic self-identification of immigrants. Economics Letters, 98(3), 235–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdi Hersi .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hersi, A. (2018). Clash of Integration Frames. In: Conceptualisation of Integration . Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91235-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91235-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91234-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91235-6

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics