Advertisement

Clash of Integration Frames

  • Abdi HersiEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

The concept of immigrant integration has been defined by multiple constituent actors such as academics, host communities, media and governments. This chapter engages in an integrated analysis and discussion of the findings of both the thematically varied definitions of integration and the richer cognitive schemas and frames of integration provided by Muslim participants of this research. This chapter reveals an emerging clash of integration frames between immigrant integration stakeholders.

References

  1. Abdalla, M. (2012). Sacred law in secular land: To what extent should Sharia law be followed in Australia? The Griffith Law Review, 21(3), 657–679.Google Scholar
  2. Akbari, A. H., & MacDonald, M. (2014). Immigration policy in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, and the United States: An overview of recent trends. International Migration Review, 48(3), 801–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arai, M., Karlsson, J., & Lundholm, M. (2011). On fragile grounds: A replication of “Are Muslim immigrants different in terms of cultural integration?” Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(5), 1002–1011.Google Scholar
  4. Bertossi, C., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2012). National models of immigrant integration: The costs for comparative research. Comparative European Politics, 10(3), 237–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bisin, A., Patacchini, E., Verdier, T., & Zenou, Y. (2011). Ethnic identity and labour market outcomes of immigrants in Europe. Economic Policy, 26(65), 57–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Black, A. (2008). Accommodating Shariah law in Australia’s legal system. Alternative Law Journal, 33(4), 214–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Black, A., & Abdullah, K. (2011). Good and bad Sharia: Australia’s mixed response to Islamic law. University of New South Wales Law Journal, 34(1), 383.Google Scholar
  8. Bloemraad, I. (2006). Becoming a citizen: Incorporating immigrants and refugees in the United States and Canada. Berkeley: University of California. Google Scholar
  9. Bloemraad, I. (2012). Understanding “Canadian exceptionalism” in immigration and pluralism policy. In B. Stiftung (Ed.), Rethinking national identity in the age of migration (pp. 145–170). Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  10. Bocker, A., & Strik, T. (2011). Language and knowledge tests for permanent residence rights: Help or hindrance for integration. European Journal of Migration & Law, 13, 157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bouma, G., Cahill, D., Dellal, H., & Zwartz, A. (2011). Freedom of religion and belief in 21st century Australia. Canberra: Australian Human Rights Commission.Google Scholar
  12. Campomori, F., & Caponio, T. (2013). Competing frames of immigrant integration in the EU: Geographies of social inclusion in Italian regions. Policy Studies, 34(2), 162–179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Castles, S. (2007). Twenty-first-century migration as a challenge to sociology. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 33(3), 351–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cesari, J. (2007). Muslim identities in Europe: The snare of exceptionalism. In A. Al-Azmeh & E. Fokas (Eds.), Islam in Europe: Diversity, identity and influence (pp. 49–67). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. De Leeuw, M., & Van Wichelen, S. (2012). Civilizing migrants: Integration, culture and citizenship. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 195–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dunn, K., Forrest, J., Ip, D., Babacan, H., Paradise, Y., & Pederson, A. (2008). Challenging racism: The anti-racism research project, state-level comparison. In Proceedings of 4Rs Conference: Rights, Reconciliation, Respect, Responsibility (30 September–3 October). Sydney, NSW: University of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.uws.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/42185/State_level_comparison_for_4Rs_conference.pdf.
  17. Eickelman, D. F., & Piscatori, J. (Eds.). (1990). Muslim travelers, migration, and the religious imagination (pp. 3–28). Berkley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Elmadmad, K. (2008). Asylum in Islam and in modern refugee law. Refugee Survey Quarterly, 27(2), 51–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Entzinger, H. (2014). The growing gap between facts and discourse on immigrant integration in the Netherlands. Identities, 21(6), 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fozdar, F. (2012). Social cohesion and skilled Muslim refugees in Australia employment, social capital and discrimination. Journal of Sociology, 48(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodman, S. W. (2010). Integration requirements for integration’s sake? Identifying, categorising and comparing civic integration. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 36(5), 753–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harles, J. C. (1997). Integration before assimilation: Immigration, multiculturalism and the Canadian polity. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 30(4), 711–736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hassan, R. (2006). Globalisation’s challenge to the Islamic Ummah. Asian Journal of Social Science, 34(2), 311–323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Heckmann, F., & Schnapper, D. (Eds.). (2003). The integration of immigrants in European societies: National differences and trends of convergence (Vol. 7). Stuttgart, DE: Lucius & Lucius. Google Scholar
  25. Hollifield, J., Martin, P., & Orrenius, P. (Eds.). (2014). Controlling immigration: A global perspective. Redwood City, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Hudson, W. (2003). Religious citizenship. Australian Journal of Politics & History, 49(3), 425–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Huntington, S. P. (1993). The clash of civilizations? Foreign Affairs, 72(3), 22–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Husic, E. (2006). Islam and Australia: Can a Muslim get elected to parliament in a war on terror? The Sydney Papers, 18(1), 88–99.Google Scholar
  29. International Organisation for Migration (2014). Compendium of migrant integration policies and practices, Retrieved October 22, 2014, from www.iom.int.
  30. Jackson, D. (2011). Europe and the migrant experience: Transforming integration. Transformation: An International Journal of Holistic Mission Studies, 28(1), 14–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Joppke, C. (2013). Through the European looking glass: Citizenship tests in the USA, Australia, and Canada. Citizenship Studies, 17(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Koopmans, R., Lancee, B., & Schaeffer, M. (Eds.). (2014). Social cohesion and immigration in Europe and North America: Mechanisms, conditions, and causality. London: Routledge. Google Scholar
  33. Kundnani, A. (2012). Multiculturalism and its discontents: Left, right and liberal. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(2), 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kuran, T., & Sandholm, W. H. (2008). Cultural integration and its discontents. The Review of Economic Studies, 75(1), 201–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kymlicka, W. (2011). Multicultural citizenship within multination states. Ethnicities, 11(3), 281–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lahav, G. (2004). Immigration and politics in the new Europe: Reinventing borders. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li, P. S. (2003). Deconstructing Canada’s discourses of immigrant integration. Journal of International Migration and Integration, 4(3), 315–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mac Éinrí, P. (2007). The challenge of migrant integration in Ireland. Evidence from New Countries of Immigration, 9(1), 75–90.Google Scholar
  39. Markus, A. (2011). Attitudes to multiculturalism and cultural diversity. In M. Clyne & J. Jupp (Eds.), Multiculturalism and integration: A harmonious relationship. Canberra: Australian National University Press.Google Scholar
  40. Markus, A. (2013). Mapping social cohesion 2012: The Scanlon foundation survey. Retrieved from http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/mapping-population/social-cohesion-report.php.
  41. Mason, R. (2010). Australian multiculturalism: Revisiting Australia’s political heritage and the migrant presence. History Compass, 8, 817–827.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McHugh, M. (2014). Immigrant civic integration and service access initiatives. Access initiative: City sized solution for city-sized needs. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  43. Meer, N., & Modood, T. (2012). For “Jewish” read “Muslim”? Islamophobia as a form of racialisation of ethno religious groups in Britain today. Islamophobia Studies Journal, 1(1), 36–55.Google Scholar
  44. Mitchell, M. C. (2013). Religion, identity and politics in Northern Ireland: Boundaries of belonging and belief. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Modood, T. (2013). Post-immigration ‘difference’ and integration. Meritum, revista de Direito da Universidade FUMEC, 8(1), 389–415. Google Scholar
  46. Roggeband, C., & Vliegenthart, R. (2007). Divergent framing: The public debate on migration in the Dutch parliament and media, 1995–2004. West European Politics, 30(3), 524–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sohrabi, H., & Farquharson, K. (2015). Social integration of Australian Muslims: A dramaturgical perspective. Journal of Sociology, 52(2). doi:1440783314562415.Google Scholar
  48. Tolsma, J., Lubbers, M., & Gijsberts, M. (2012). Education and cultural integration among ethnic minorities and natives in the Netherlands: A test of the integration paradox. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 38(5), 793–813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van der Noll, J. (2014). Religious toleration of Muslims in the German public sphere. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 38, 60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wets, J. (2006). The Turkish community in Austria and Belgium: The challenge of integration. Turkish Studies, 7(1), 85–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wiesbrock, A. (2011). The integration of immigrants in Sweden: A model for the European union? International Migration, 49(4), 48–66.Google Scholar
  52. Zimmermann, L., Gataullina, L., Constant, A., & Zimmermann, K. F. (2008). Human capital and ethnic self-identification of immigrants. Economics Letters, 98(3), 235–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith Centre for Social and Cultural ResearchGriffith UniversityNathanAustralia

Personalised recommendations