Skip to main content

The Model of Social Capital

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Social Capital in American Life
  • 313 Accesses

Abstract

Jones elaborates on the model and straightforward theory of social capital used throughout this work. The data reveal, with regard to work and voluntary association: Americans who work the most hours have the highest average levels of voluntary association, and non-working Americans have the lowest. Voluntary association is also highest among married Americans with children. Overall, levels of voluntary association have declined over time, however. With regard to youth group membership, there has been a minor decline over time. With regard to socialization, Americans spend more social evenings with friends than in the 1970s, and simultaneously, kin socializing has increased to its highpoint in the 2000s after a decline in the 1980s. Neighbor socializing, however, is in long-term decline.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Jones, Social Capital in America, op cit., 72.

  2. 2.

    For the main effect of decade, F = 8.231, p < .001; for the main effect of work hours, F = 63.109, p < .001. For the three-way interaction effect of hours upon voluntary association by decade, F = 1.089, p = .367 not significant (n.s.).

  3. 3.

    The Family-centeredness of these particular items was first recommended by Robert Putnam in Bowling Alone, 278.

  4. 4.

    For the main effect of work hours, F = 15.315, p < .001; for the main effect of decade F = 10.045, p < .001.

  5. 5.

    For the main effect of work hours, F = 81.143, p < .001; for the main effect of decade, F = 6.655, p < .001; for the interaction effect, F = 2.201, p = .019.

  6. 6.

    Such direct network measures will be examined in Chap. 10.

  7. 7.

    Technically, the dependent variable in an ANOVA analysis should be truly interval like age or number of siblings. It is judged that this measure is numeric enough to reasonably meet the statistical assumption.

  8. 8.

    For the main effect of work hours, F= 19.483, p < .001; for the main effect of decade, F = 8.573, p < .001.

  9. 9.

    For the main effect of work hours, F = 174.672, p < .001; for the main effect of decade, F = 5.489, p < .001.

  10. 10.

    For the main effect of work hours, F = 8.330, p < .001; for the main effect of decade, F = 10.630, p < .001.

  11. 11.

    For the main effect of decade, F = 47.105, p < .001. The overall mean dropped from 2.778 in the 1970s to 2.381 in the 2000s.

  12. 12.

    For the main effect of work hours, F = 33.472, p < .001; for the interaction effect of work hours and decade, F = 1.184, p = n.s.

  13. 13.

    For the main effect of family structure, F = 58.060, p < .001.

  14. 14.

    For the main effect of decade, F = 5.290, p < .001; for the interaction effect, F = 2.099, p = .050.

  15. 15.

    For the main effect of family structure, F = 129.672, p < .001; for the interaction effect, F = 2.623, p = .015.

  16. 16.

    For the main effect of family structure, F = 32.758, p < .001; for the interaction effect, F = 1.644, p = n.s.; for the main effect of decade, F = 6.209, p < .001.

  17. 17.

    For the main effect of family structure, F = 338.428, p < .001; for the main effect of decade, F = 13.069, p < .001; for the interaction effect, F = 1.586, p = n.s.

  18. 18.

    For the main effect of family structure, F = 785.955, p < .001; for the main effect of decade, F = 4.877, p = .002.

  19. 19.

    For the main effect of family structure, F = 35.344, p < .001; for the main effect of decade, F = 12.988, p < .001.

  20. 20.

    For the main effect of family structure, F = 195.629, p < .001; for the main effect of decade, F = 62.071, p < .001.

Reference

  • Jones, Brian J. Social Capital in America: Counting Buried Treasure (Boulder, CO: Paradigm Publishers, 2011).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Jones, B.J. (2019). The Model of Social Capital. In: Social Capital in American Life. Palgrave Pivot, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91180-9_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91180-9_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Pivot, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91179-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91180-9

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics