Advertisement

Why Do We Need to Measure Performance? A Local Government Perspective

Chapter
First Online:
  • 919 Downloads

Abstract

Performance measurement is always an interesting and emotive topic to discuss. Many people are comforted by calculating key performance indicators and feel that they are successful if they count everything they can. However nothing grows just by counting it. In this chapter we will look at what performance measurement is and some of the main theories used, like the Balanced Scorecard. We take a particular look at the public sector and specifically Local Government. Local Government has a more complicated “business model” since many of their service users are also taxpayers and they need to demonstrate that taxpayers’ funds have been spent fairly and responsibly. The conclusion of the chapter shows that more research is needed to see how performance measurement impacts performance overall.

Keywords

Performance measurement Balanced scorecard Local government 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Antonsen, Yngve. 2014. “The Downside of the Balanced Scorecard: A Case Study from Norway.” Scandinavian Journal of Management 30 (1): 40–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2013.08.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnaboldi, Michela, Irvine Lapsley, and Ileana Steccolini. 2015. “Performance Management in the Public Sector: The Ultimate Challenge.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 31 (1): 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faam.12049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balabonienė, Ingrida, and Giedrė Večerskienė. 2015. “The Aspects of Performance Measurement in Public Sector Organization.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 213: 314–320.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.11.544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bessire, Dominique, and C. Richard Baker. 2005. “The French Tableau de Bord and the American Balanced Scorecard: A Critical Analysis.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 16 (6): 645–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2004.01.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bevan, Gwyn, and Christopher Hood. 2006. “What’s Measured Is What Matters: Targets and Gaming in the English Public Health Care System.” Public Administration 84 (3): 517–538. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2006.00600.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bourne, Mike. 2008. “Performance Measurement: Learning from the Past and Projecting the Future.” Measuring Business Excellence 12 (4): 67–72.  https://doi.org/10.1108/13683040810919971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourne, Mike. 2013. “What Is Balanced Scorecard.” https://connect.som.cranfield.ac.uk/p7m07c9otnu/.
  8. Bourne, Mike, and Pippa Bourne. 2002. Balanced Scorecard in a Week. London: Hodder & Stoughton.Google Scholar
  9. Bourne, Mike, and Andy Neely. 2002. “Cause and Effect.” Financial Management, September.Google Scholar
  10. Bourne, Mike, and Monica Franco-Santos. 2010. “Performance Management.” Financial Management, March.Google Scholar
  11. Bourne, Mike, Steven A. Melnyk, Umit Bititci, K. Platts, and B. Andersen. 2014. “Editorial: Emerging Issues in Performance Measurement.” Management Accounting Research 25: 117–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bourne, Mike, Andy Neely, Ken Platts, and John Mills. 2002. “The Success and Failure of Performance Measurement Initiatives Perceptions of Participating Managers.” IJOPM International Journal of Operations & Production Management 2211 (11): 1288–1310.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210450329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cartwright, John. 1975. “Corporate Planning in Local Government—Implications for the Elected Member.” Long Range Planning 8 (2): 46–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(75)90004-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chang, L, S.W. Lin, and D.N. Northcott. 2002. “The NHS Performance Assessment Framework: A ‘Balanced Scorecard’ Approach?” Journal of Management in Medicine 16 (5): 345–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dreveton, Benjamin. 2013. “The Advantages of the Balanced Scorecard in the Public Sector: Beyond Performance Measurement.” Public Money & Management 33 (2): 131–136.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2013.763425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Drury, Colin. 2015. Management and Cost Accounting, 9th ed. Andover: Cengage.Google Scholar
  17. Evans, S. 2017. “A Refreshing Approach.” The Municipal Journal (The MJ): 35. 20 April.Google Scholar
  18. Folan, Paul, and Jim Browne. 2005. “A Review of Performance Measurement: Towards Performance Management.” Computers in Industry 56 (7): 663–680.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2005.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franco-Santos, Monica, Lorenzo Lucianetti, and Mike Bourne. 2012. “Contemporary Performance Measurement Systems: A Review of Their Consequences and a Framework for Research.” Management Accounting Research 23 (2): 79–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2012.04.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Franco-Santos, Monica, Mike Kennerley, Pietro Micheli, Veronica Martinez, Steve Mason, Bernard Marr, Dina Gray, and Andrew Neely. 2007. “Towards a Definition of a Business Performance Measurement System Article Information.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management. 27 (8): 784–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fryer, K., J. Antony, and S. Ogden. 2009. “Performance Management in the Public Sector.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 22 (6): 478–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ghobadian, A., and J. Ashworth. 1994. “Performance Measurement in Local Government—Concept and Practice.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 14 (5): 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glinkowska, Beata, and Bogusław Kaczmarek. 2015. “Classical and Modern Concepts of Corporate Governance (Stewardship Theory and Agency Theory).” Management 19 (2): 84–92.  https://doi.org/10.1515/manment-2015-0015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hamid, Siti Mardinah Binti Abdul, Jamil Bin Haji Hamali, and Firdaus Abdullah. 2016. “Performance Measurement for Local Authorities in Sarawak.” Procedia—Social and Behavioral Sciences 224: 437–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hopper, T., Deryl Northcott, and R. Scapens. 2007. Issues in Management Accounting, 3rd ed. Essex: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  26. Hoque, Zahirul. 2014. “20 Years of Studies on the Balanced Scorecard: Trends, Accomplishments, Gaps and Opportunities for Future Research.” British Accounting Review 46 (1): 33–59. Elsevier Ltd.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bar.2013.10.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jääskeläinen, Aki, and Harri Laihonen. 2014. “A Strategy Framework for Performance Measurement in the Public Sector.” Public Money & Management 34 (5): 355–362.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2014.945807.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jackson, Peter M. 2011. “Governance by Numbers: What Have We Learned over the Past 30 Years?” Public Money & Management 31 (1): 13–26.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2011.545542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton. 1992. “The Balanced Score Card Measures That Drive Performance.” Harvard Business Review 70 (1): 71–79.Google Scholar
  30. Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton. 1996. The Balanced Scorecard. Translating Strategy into Action. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  31. Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton. 2001. “Transforming the Balanced Scorecard from Performance Measurement to Strategic Management: Part II.” Accounting Horizons 15 (2): 147–160.  https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2001.15.2.147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kaplan, Robert S., and David P. Norton. 2004. Strategy Maps. Converting Intangible Assets into Tangible Outcomes. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.Google Scholar
  33. Larimo, Jorma, Huu Le Nguyen, and Tahir Ali. 2016. “Performance Measurement Choices in International Joint Ventures: What Factors Drive Them?” Journal of Business Research 69 (2): 877–887.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.07.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lewis, Jenny M. 2015. “The Politics and Consequences of Performance Measurement.” Policy and Society 34 (1): 1–12. Policy and Society Associates Ltd Partnership.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lowe, Toby. 2013. “New Development: The Paradox of Outcomes—The More We Measure, the Less We Understand.” Public Money & Management 33 (3): 213–216.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2013.785707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Marginson, David, Laurie McAulay, Melvin Roush, and Tony van Zijl. 2014. “Examining a Positive Psychological Role for Performance Measures.” Management Accounting Research 25 (1): 63–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.10.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Marinho, Sidnei Vieira, and Cristiano Cagnin. 2014. “The Roles of FTA in Improving Performance Measurement Systems to Enable Alignment between Business Strategy and Operations: Insights from Three Practical Cases.” Futures 59: 50–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Melnyk, Steven A., Umit Bititci, Ken Platts, Jutta Tobias, and Bjorn Andersen. 2014. “Is Performance Measurement and Management Fit for the Future?” Management Accounting Research 25 (2): 173–186.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mar.2013.07.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Merchant, Kenneth A., and W. Van der Stede. 2012. Management Control Systems. Performance Measurement, Evaluation and Incentives, 3rd ed. Harlow: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  40. Micheli, Pietro, and Jean-Francois Manzoni. 2010. “Strategic Performance Measurement: Benefits, Limitations and Paradoxes.” Long Range Planning 43: 465–476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nath, Nirmala, and Umesh Sharma. 2014. “Performance Management Systems in the Public Housing Sector. Dissemination to Diffusion.” Australian Accounting Review 24 (1): 2–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Neely, Andy. 1999. “The Performance Measurement Revolution: Why Now and What Next?” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19 (2): 205–228.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579910247437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Neely, Andy. 2005. “The Evolution of Performance Measurement Research.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 25 (12): 1264–1277.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570510633648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Neely, A., and Mike Bourne. 2000. “Why Measurement Initiatives Fail.” Measuring Business Excellence 4 (4): 3–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Neely, A., M. Gregory, and K. Platts. 1995. “Performance Measurement System Design—A Literature Review and Research Agenda.” International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15 (4): 80–116.  https://doi.org/10.1108/01443579510083622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Norreklit, Hanne. 2003. “The Balanced Scorecard: What Is the Score? A Rhetorical Analysis of the Balanced Scorecard.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 28 (6): 591–619.  https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-3682(02)00097-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Northcott, Deryl, and Tuivaiti Ma’amora Taulapapa. 2012. “Using the Balanced Scorecard to Manage Performance in Public Sector Organizations: Issues and Challenges.” International Journal of Public Sector Management 25 (3): 166–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Pandey, I. 2005. “Balanced Scorecard: Myth and Reality.” Vikalpa 30 (1): 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pavlov, Andrey, Matteo Mura, Monica Franco-Santos, and Mike Bourne. 2017. “Modelling the Impact of Performance Management Practices on Firm Performance: Interaction with Human Resource Management Practices.” Production Planning & Control 28 (5): 431–443.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09537287.2017.1302614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Radnor, Zoe, and D Barnes. 2007. “Historical Analysis of Performance Measurement and Management in Operations Management.” International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management 56 (5): 384–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ross, L. 2011. Public Sector Performance. A Global Perspective. London: CIMA.Google Scholar
  53. Seal, W., R.H. Garrison, and E.W. Noreen. 2012. Management Accounting, 4th ed. Berkshire: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  54. Seddon, John. 2008. Systems Thinking in the Public Sector. The Failure of the Reform Regime… and a Manifesto for a Better Way. Axminster: Triarchy Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sharma, Bishnu, and David Gadenne. 2011. “Balanced Scorecard Implementation in a Local Government Authority: Issues and Challenges.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 70 (2): 167–184.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8500.2011.00718.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tegarden, Linda F., Yolanda Sarason, and Catherine Banbury. 2003. “Linking Strategy Processes to Performance Outcomes in Dynamic Environments: The Need to Target Multiple Bull’s Eyes.” Journal of Managerial Issues. http://ezproxy.lib.ucf.edu/login?URL=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=psyh&AN=2003-99718-001&site=ehost-live.
  57. van der Meer-Kooistra, J., and E.G.J. Vosselman. 2004. “The Balanced Scorecard: Adoption and Application.” In Advances in Management Accounting, edited by Mark Epstein and John Y. Lee, 287–310. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  58. West, Damian, and Deborah Blackman. 2015. “Performance Management in the Public Sector.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 74 (1): 73–81.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8500.12130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Williams, Wil, and Duncan Lewis. 2008. “Strategic Management Tools and Public Sector Management.” Public Management Review 10 (5): 653–671.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14719030802264382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wilson, David, and Chris Game. 2011. Local Government in the United Kingdom, 5th ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yadav, Neetu, and Mahim Sagar. 2013. “Performance Measurement and Management Frameworks: Research Trends of the Last Two Decades.” Business Process Management Journal 19 (6): 947–971.  https://doi.org/10.1108/bpmj-01-2013-0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Derby Business SchoolUniversity of DerbyDerbyUK

Personalised recommendations

Cite chapter

Buy options