Skip to main content

Total Gastrectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1864 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter describes the robotic gastrectomy procedure, including patient selection, setup, all surgical steps including D2 lymphadenectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction, and postoperative care. Surgeons with little experience with robotic gastrectomy should initially operate on patients without significant comorbidities, with small tumors, and with normal BMI and intestinal histology. The most common major complication is a leak of the esophagojejunal anastomosis. No data on the long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy are yet available (clinical trials are ongoing), but it provides the same advantages over open gastrectomy of any minimally invasive approach: shorter hospital stays and lower intraoperative blood loss. Though robotic procedures are associated with greater cost, it may be warranted in settings with sufficient surgical volume, and robotic equipment will likely become less expensive as technology advances.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Strong VE, Gholami S, Shah MA, Tang LH, Janjigian YY, Schattner M, et al. Total gastrectomy for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer at a single center: postsurgical outcomes in 41 patients. Ann Surg. 2017;266(6):1006–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Macdonald JS, Smalley SR, Benedetti J, Hundahl SA, Estes NC, Stemmermann GN, et al. Chemoradiotherapy after surgery compared with surgery alone for adenocarcinoma of the stomach or gastroesophageal junction. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:725–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cunningham D, Allum WH, Stenning SP, Thompson JN, Van de Velde CJ, Nicolson M, MAGIC Trial Participants, et al. Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:11–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kitano S, Iso Y, Moriyama M, Sugimachi K. Laparoscopy-assisted Billroth I gastrectomy. Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1994;4:146–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kim W, Kim HH, Han SU, Kim MC, Hyung WJ, Ryu SW, Korean Laparo-endoscopic Gastrointestinal Surgery Study (KLASS) Group, et al. Decreased morbidity of laparoscopic distal gastrectomy compared with open distal gastrectomy for stage I gastric cancer: short-term outcomes from a multicenter randomized controlled trial (KLASS-01). Ann Surg. 2016;263:28–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kitano S, Shiraishi N, Fujii K, Yasuda K, Inomata M, Adachi Y. A randomized controlled trial comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for the treatment of early gastric cancer: an interim report. Surgery. 2002;131:S306–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lee JH, Han HS, Lee JH. A prospective randomized study comparing open vs laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy in early gastric cancer: early results. Surg Endosc. 2005;19:168–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Huscher CG, Mingoli A, Sgarzini G, Sansonetti A, Di Paola M, Recher A, Ponzano C. Laparoscopic versus open subtotal gastrectomy for distal gastric cancer: five-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Ann Surg. 2005;241:232–7.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kim YW, Baik YH, Yun YH, Nam BH, Kim DH, Choi IJ, Bae JM. Improved quality of life outcomes after laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. Ann Surg. 2008;248:721–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim HH, Hyung WJ, Cho GS, Kim MC, Han SU, Kim W, et al. Morbidity and mortality of laparoscopic gastrectomy versus open gastrectomy for gastric cancer: an interim report—a phase III multicenter, prospective, randomized trial (KLASS trial). Ann Surg. 2010;251:417–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vinuela EF, Gonen M, Brennan MF, Coit DG, Strong VE. Laparoscopic versus open distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies. Ann Surg. 2012;255:446–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kelly KJ, Selby L, Chou JF, Dukleska K, Capanu M, Coit DG, et al. Laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma in the west: a case-control study. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:3590–6.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hashizume M, Sugimachi K. Robot-assisted gastric surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2003;83:1429–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Giulianotti PC, Coratti A, Angelini M, Sbrana F, Cecconi S, Balestracci T, Caravaglios G. Robotics in general surgery: personal experience in a large community hospital. Arch Surg. 2003;138:777–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Anderson C, Ellenhorn J, Hellan M, Pigazzi A. Pilot series of robot-assisted laparoscopic subtotal gastrectomy with extended lymphadenectomy for gastric cancer. Surg Endosc. 2007;21:1662–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Marano A, Choi YY, Hyung WJ, Kim YM, Kim J, Noh SH. Robotic versus laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy: a meta-analysis. J Gastric Cancer. 2013;13:136–48.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gaya DR, Stuart RC, Going JJ, Stanley AJ. Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer associated with E-cadherin mutation: penetrance after all. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;20:1249–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Selby LV, DeMatteo RP, Tholey RM, Jarnagin WR, Garcia-Aguilar J, Strombom PD, et al. Evolving application of minimally invasive cancer operations at a tertiary cancer center. J Surg Oncol. 2017;115(4):365–70.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kelly KJ, Strong VE. Minimally invasive total gastrectomy. In: Kim J, Garcia-Aguilar J, editors. Surgery for cancers of the gastrointestinal tract. New York: Springer; 2015. p. 87–97.

    Google Scholar 

  20. LaFemina J, Vinuela EF, Schattner MA, Gerdes H, Strong VE. Esophagojejunal reconstruction after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer using a transorally inserted anvil delivery system. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013;20:2975–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kelly KJ, Allen PJ, Brennan MF, Gollub MJ, Coit DG, Strong VE. Internal hernia after gastrectomy for cancer with roux-Y reconstruction. Surgery. 2013;154:305–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Davis JL, Selby LV, Chou JF, Schattner M, Ilson DH, Capanu M, et al. Patterns and predictors of weight loss after gastrectomy for cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:1639–45.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Selby L, Rifkin M, Yoon S, Ariyan C, Strong V. Decreased length of stay and earlier oral feeding associated with standardized postoperative clinical care for total gastrectomies at a cancer center. Surgery. 2016;160(3):607–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mortensen K, Nilsson M, Slim K, Schäfer M, Mariette C, Braga M, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Group, et al. Consensus guidelines for enhanced recovery after gastrectomy: enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society recommendations. Br J Surg. 2014;101:1209–29.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lassen K, Kjaeve J, Fetveit T, Tranø G, Sigurdsson HK, Horn A, Revhaug A. Allowing normal food at will after major upper gastrointestinal surgery does not increase morbidity: a randomized multicenter trial. Ann Surg. 2008;247:721–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Selby LV, Vertosick EA, Sjoberg DD, Schattner MA, Janjigian YY, Brennan MF, et al. Morbidity after total gastrectomy: analysis of 238 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2015;220:863–71.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shim JH, Yoo HM, Oh SI, Nam MJ, Jeon HM, Park CH, Song KY. Various types of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16:420–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Corcione F, Pirozzi F, Cuccurullo D, Angelini P, Cimmino V, Settembre A. Laparoscopic total gastrectomy in gastric cancer: our experience in 92 cases. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2013;22:271–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nagai E, Ohuchida K, Nakata K, Miyasaka Y, Maeyama R, Toma H, et al. Feasibility and safety of intracorporeal esophagojejunostomy after laparoscopic total gastrectomy: inverted T-shaped anastomosis using linear staplers. Surgery. 2013;153:732–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Park JY, Jo MJ, Nam BH, Kim Y, Eom BW, Yoon HM, et al. Surgical stress after robot-assisted distal gastrectomy and its economic implications. Br J Surg. 2012;99:1554–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luke V. Selby MD, MS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Selby, L.V., Strong, V.E. (2018). Total Gastrectomy. In: Fong, Y., Woo, Y., Hyung, W., Lau, C., Strong, V. (eds) The SAGES Atlas of Robotic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91045-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91045-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91043-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91045-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics