Advertisement

The Engineering Knowledge Research Program

  • Terry Bristol
Chapter
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 31)

Abstract

The engineering knowledge research program is part of a larger effort to articulate a philosophy of engineering and an engineering worldview. Engineering is not ‘merely’ applied science. Engineering knowledge requires a more comprehensive conceptual framework than scientific knowledge.

The paradigm shift from the limited scientific epistemology to the broader engineering epistemology involves a problem shift. The scientific inquirer seeks the ‘facts’ of ‘objective’ reality – out there. The participant engineer, embodied in reality, seeks ‘methods’ regarding how to work in the world to bring about a more desirable future.

The demonstration of complementarity and uncertainty in the new physics established the limits of the classical scientific concept of detached, observer-independent inquiry and knowledge. Quantum uncertainty entails that the inquirer is an active participant in the irreversible historical development of reality. Participant engineering inquiry and knowledge are concerned with ‘practical reason’. As Kant pointed out practical reason is about ‘how we should live’ – the defining question of morality. Participant engineering research and development is concerned with ‘the construction of the good.’

In the design of the modern k12 STEM curriculum it is crucial that developers recognize that the engineering representation of inquiry and knowledge requires a broader conceptual framework than is possible in the scientific representation. Efforts to integrate engineering into liberal arts and sciences colleges have stalled due to a failure to properly understanding of the relationship between engineering and science.

The scientific representation of inquiry isn’t self-referentially coherent within the deterministic scientific worldview. The engineering representation of embodied inquiry is self-referentially coherent within a progressively emerging reality.

Keywords

Engineering knowledge Engineering philosophy Embodied inquiry Constructive emergence Moral intelligence 

References

  1. Bristol, T. (2015). What is engineering? What is the value framework of engineering practice?. Linus Pauling Memorial Lecture Series. Video. https://youtu.be/08kfPUEnpGM
  2. Bristol, T. (2016). Give space my love: An intellectual odyssey with Dr. Stephen Hawking. Institute for Science, Engineering and Public Policy, Portland.Google Scholar
  3. Bucciarelli, L. (2000). Designing engineers. Cambridge, MA/London: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bucciarelli, L. (2003). Engineering philosophy. Delft: Delft University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bucciarelli, L., Drew, D., & Sheila, T. (2015). Liberal studies in engineering – Workshop report. http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/96672 . Accessed on 12 Mar 2015.
  6. Bugliarello, G. (2003). The BIOSOMA: Reflections on the synthesis of biology, society and machines. New York: Polytechnic Press.Google Scholar
  7. Bush, V. (1945). Science, the endless frontier: A report to the President. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Library.Google Scholar
  8. De Broglie, L. (1958). The revolution in physics: A non-mathematical survey of quanta. New York: Noonday Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dewey, J. (1929/1960). The quest for certainty: A study in the relation of knowledge and action. Los Angeles: Capricorn Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dewey, J. (1929/1980). The quest for certainty: A study of the relation of knowledge and action. New York: Perigee Books.Google Scholar
  11. Downey, G. (Ed.) (2015). Special issue: Liberal studies of engineering – A design plan. Engineering Studies, 7(2–3). Cambridge, MA: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
  12. Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2016). Teaching and learning STEM: A practical guide. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Wiley.Google Scholar
  13. Fesmire, S. (2003). John Dewey and moral imagination: Pragmatism in ethics. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Feynmann, R. (1964). The character of physical law (Chapter 6, p. 129). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. Florman, S. (1977). The existential pleasures of engineering. New York: St Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  16. Heilbron, J. (2013). Bohr’s creation of his quantum atom, (video) http://meetings.aps.org/link/BAPS.2013.APR.P1.1. See also Heilbron, J., & Aaserud, F. (2013). Love, literature and the quantum atom: Niels Bohr’s 1913 trilogy revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  17. Heisenberg, W. (2007). Physics and philosophy: The revolution in modern science (Harper perennial modern classics). New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  18. James, W. (2015). Pragmatism: A new name for some old ways of thinking. NewYork: CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform.Google Scholar
  19. Kant, I. (2004). The critique of practical reason. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Kelly, K. (2011). What technology wants (pp. 341–342). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago/London: Phoenix Books, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  22. Lakatos, I., & Feyerabend, P. (1991). For and against method: Including Lakatos’s lectures on scientific method and the Feyerabend-Lakatos correspondence. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  23. Peirce, C. S. (2011). The philosophical writings of Peirce. Mineola: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
  24. Petroski, H. (2010). The essential engineer: Why science alone will not solve our global problems. New York: Vintage, Random House.Google Scholar
  25. Popper, K. (2002). Conjectures and refutations: The growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge Classics.Google Scholar
  26. Reid, R. G. B. (2007). Biological emergences: Evolution by natural experiment. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  27. Romer, P. (1990). Endogenous technological change. Journal of Political Economy, 98 (5), Part 2: The problem of development: A conference of the institute for the study of free enterprise systems, pp. 71–102. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  28. Royce, J. (1965). The religious aspect of philosophy. Gloucester: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
  29. Schilpp, A. (Ed.). (1951). Albert Einstein: Philosopher-Scientist (Vol. 1, p. 81). New York: Tudor Publishing.Google Scholar
  30. Schneider, E., & Sagan, D. (2005). Into the cool: Energy flow, thermodynamics and life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  31. Simon, H. (1981/1996). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  32. Smolin, L. (2009). Informal chalk and talk. Perimeter Institute Recorded Seminar Archive (PIRSA). http://pirsa.org/09080032/. Accessed on 15 May 2010.
  33. Tzu, L. (2016). Tao Te Chung (S. Mitchell, Trans.). Hollywood: Simon & Brown.Google Scholar
  34. Ulanowicz, R. (2009). A third window: Natural life beyond Newton and Darwin. West Conshohocken: Templeton Press.Google Scholar
  35. Vincenti, W. (1993). What engineers know and how they know it. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Warsh, D. (2006). Knowledge and the wealth of nations: A story of economic discovery. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Whitehead, A. N. (1969). Process and reality: An essay in cosmology. New York: Free Press (Simon & Schuster).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Science, Engineering and Public PolicyPortland State UniversityPortlandUSA

Personalised recommendations