New Trends in Engineering Ethics – A Japanese Perspective

  • Hidekazu KanemitsuEmail author
Part of the Philosophy of Engineering and Technology book series (POET, volume 31)


Engineering ethics education is widespread in Japan and is offered by many engineering academic and professional societies. Two elements, namely, the use of an analogy between ethical and design problems and the use of specific methods for ethical decision-making, like a seven-step guide, are the characteristics of current Japanese engineering ethics education. This form of ethics education helps students view ethical problems in a familiar light and elicits realistic solutions from them. However, this method lacks the normative sources to evaluate the moral design of problems, and sometimes fails to motivate students to learn engineering or/and engineering ethics by emphasizing on the negative aspects of engineering. To compensate for this lack, scholars expressed the need for introducing “aspirational ethics” in addition to the existing “preventive ethics.” Apparently, virtue ethics and positive psychology provide fruitful insights in realizing this aim. However, one needs to be wary of being too optimistic or too pessimistic. The author believes that the philosophy of technology can provide a new framework for engineering ethics. Especially, mediation theory by Peter-Paul Verbeek proposes a third way that is neither too pessimistic nor too optimistic by claiming that we need to “accompany” technological development, not aiming to merely reject or accept a new technology; the theory also provides a perspective of normative sources to evaluate moral design. Future engineering ethics would do well to incorporate this philosophy of technology further.


Engineering ethics Aspirational ethics Philosophy of technology Postphenomenology Technological mediation 



This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 16 K02143 and JP16K00976.


  1. Davis, M. (1999). Ethics and the university. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Fudano, J. (2015). What is the well-being of the ethical engineer?. Journal of IEE Japan, 135(5), 283–286. Scholar
  3. Han, H. (2015). Virtue ethics, positive psychology, and a new model of science and engineering ethics education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21, 441–460. Scholar
  4. Harris, C. E., Jr. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 153–164. Scholar
  5. Harris, C. E., Jr. (2013). Engineering ethics: From preventive ethics to aspirational ethics. In D. P. Michelfelder, N. McCarthy, & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and engineering: Reflections on practice, principles and process (pp. 177–187). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Harris, C. E., Jr., et al. (2013). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases (5th ed.). Boston: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  7. Ishihara, K. (2002). The necessity of introducing external perspective into engineering ethics. In N. Kamo (Ed.), Research materials for social philosophy (pp. 226–237), I.Google Scholar
  8. JABEE. (2015). JABEE Common criteria for accreditation of professional education programs applicable in the years 2015. Accessed 29 Nov 2016.
  9. Kanemitsu, H. (2008). Agent-centered approach in engineering ethics: A consideration of the methodology of applied ethics. In K. Ishihara & M. Shunzo (Eds.), Applied ethics: Perspectives from Asia and beyond. Center for applied ethics and philosophy (pp. 97–105). Sapporo: Hokkaido University.Google Scholar
  10. Kobayashi, Y., & Fudano, J. (2014). Commentary on learning and educational objectives of engineering ethics education. Journal of JSEE, 62(4), 81–87. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  11. Sato, Y., & Harada, S. (2005). Survey results on JABEE. Journal of JSEE, 53(3), 101–112. (in Japanese).Google Scholar
  12. Seligman, M. (2011). Flourishing: A visionary understanding of happiness and well-being. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  13. Stovall, P. (2011). Professional virtue and professional self-awareness: A case study in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 109–132. Scholar
  14. Verbeek, P. P. (2005). What things do: Philosophical reflections on technology, agency, and design. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Verbeek, P. P. (2006). Materializing morality: Design ethics and technological mediation. Science Technol Human Values, 31(3), 361–380. Scholar
  16. Verbeek, P. P. (2011). Moralizing technology: Understanding and designing the morality of things. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Whitbeck, C. (1995). Teaching ethics to scientists and engineers: Moral agents and moral problems. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(3), 299–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Whitbeck, C. (1998). Ethics in engineering practice and research. Cambridge: University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kanazawa Institute of TechnologyNonoichiJapan

Personalised recommendations