Skip to main content

Comparison of DSMC Chemistry Models for Rarefied Shock Tube Simulations with Nitrogen

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
31st International Symposium on Shock Waves 1 (ISSW 2017)

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1456 Accesses

Abstract

Shocks encountered in high Mach number flows lead to dissociation of gas molecules. At present, the DSMC codes that simulate such flows under rarefied conditions account for dissociations using phenomenological models such as the total collision energy (TCE) model. However, these models calculate the cross sections using equilibrium rate constants and are not appropriate to use during non-equilibrium situations. The present work calculates cross sections using ab initio methods that first calculate a highly accurate potential energy surface (PES), followed by using the quasi-classical trajectory (QCT) method to generate cross sections. A shock tube under rarefied conditions containing nitrogen gas is simulated wherein cross sections are implemented using the ab initio method as well as the classical TCE model for comparison. The comparison shows a difference in the prediction of nitrogen dissociation for high enthalpy areas where non-equilibrium is expected.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. G.A. Bird, Molecular Gas Dynamics and the Direct Simulation of Gas Flows (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Paukku, K.R. Yang, Z. Varga, D.G. Truhlar, J. Chem. Phy. 139, 4 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. R. J. Duchovic, Y. L. Volobuev, G. C. Lynch, A. W. Jasper, D. G. Truhlar, T. C. Allison, A. F. Wagner, B. C. Garrett, J. Espinosa-García, and J. C. Corchado, POTLIB., http://comp.chem.umn.edu/potlib

  4. D. Wang, J.R. Stallcop, W.M. Huo, C.E. Dateo, D.W. Schwenke, H. Partridge, J. Chem. Phy. 118, 2186 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Karplus, R.N. Porter, R.D. Sharma, J. Chem. Phy. 43, 3259 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Upendra V. Bhandarkar .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Mankodi, T.K., Bhandarkar, U.V., Puranik, B.P. (2019). Comparison of DSMC Chemistry Models for Rarefied Shock Tube Simulations with Nitrogen. In: Sasoh, A., Aoki, T., Katayama, M. (eds) 31st International Symposium on Shock Waves 1. ISSW 2017. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91020-8_110

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91020-8_110

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-91019-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-91020-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics