Skip to main content

Euler’s Work on the Surface Area of Scalene Cones

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 496 Accesses

Abstract

Around 1746, Euler took up the problem of the surface area of scalene cones, cones in which the vertex does not lie over the center of the base circle. Calling earlier solutions by Varignon and Leibniz insightful but incomplete and extending his solution to conical bodies with noncircular bases, Euler published his results in 1750 (On the Surface Area of Scalene Cones and Other Conical Bodies: De superficie conorum scalenorum aliorumque corporum conicorum). He had not actually calculated any particular areas—not surprisingly, as they generally lead to elliptic integrals. Instead, he showed how to reduce the problem to calculating the arclength of certain curves, carefully elucidating the many ways these curves may be defined. Although the curves seem naturally to involve transcendental quantities, he showed how to adjust so only algebraic quantities are needed. Some details of Euler’s solution for the scalene cones are presented here.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These appeared in the same volume of a journal of the Royal Prussian Society in Berlin (see bibliography.) Unfortunately, I obtained copies of these papers too late to include any discussion of them here.

  2. 2.

    This is Euler’s notation. For him, du was just part of the integrand and not required, as in our modern convention, to serve also as the right end of the integral. After this section, I will generally use modern conventions.

  3. 3.

    These curves are interesting to graph, but I do not see that that they have any special geometric significance for the current problem.

References

  1. Ronald S. Calinger, Leonhard Euler: Mathematical Genius in the Enlightenment, Princeton University Press 2015

    Google Scholar 

  2. Daniel J. Curtin, On the Surface Area of Scalene Cones and Other Conical Bodies: A translation of Leonhard Euler: De superficie conorum scalenorum aliorumque corporum conicorum, Euler Archives, to appear 2017

    Google Scholar 

  3. Leonhard Euler, De superficie conorum scalenorum aliorumque corporum conicorum, Novi Commentarii academiae scientiarum Petropolitanae 1, 1750, pp. 3–19

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz, Additio: Ostendens Explanationem superficiei conoïdalis cujuscunque; & speciatim explantionem superficiei Coni scaleni, ita ut ipsi vel ejus portioni cuicunque exhibeatur rectangulum æquale, interventu extensionis in rectam curvæ, per Geometriam ordinariam construendæ., Miscellanea Berolinensia ad incrementum scientiarum ex scriptis Societati Regiae Scientiarum exhibitis edita III, 1727, pp. 285–287

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pierre Varignon, Schediasma de Dimensione Superficiei Coni ad basim circularem obliqui, ope longitudinis Curvæ, cujus constructio à sola Circuli quadratura pendet, Miscellanea Berolinensia ad incrementum scientiarum ex scriptis Societati Regiae Scientiarum exhibitis edita III, 1727, pp. 280–284

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel J. Curtin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Curtin, D.J. (2018). Euler’s Work on the Surface Area of Scalene Cones. In: Zack, M., Schlimm, D. (eds) Research in History and Philosophy of Mathematics. Proceedings of the Canadian Society for History and Philosophy of Mathematics/ Société canadienne d’histoire et de philosophie des mathématiques. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90983-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics