Advertisement

Pin Assignment

  • Oliver Keszocze
  • Robert Wille
  • Rolf Drechsler
Chapter

Abstract

The previous chapter dealt with determining optimal paths for droplets in order to realize experiments. As reviewed in Chap.  1, droplets are moved by actuating the electrodes underneath the cells. Biochips with hundreds of cells, see, for example (Zhao and Chakrabarty, IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 31(2):242–254, 2012), pose a serious problem for the physical realization of the connection between the cells and the corresponding control logic. The core problems are that micro-controllers usually do not have up to thousand output pins and that the wire routing on the PCB becomes infeasible. To overcome this problem, the idea is to drive multiple electrodes by the same control signal. The process of assigning control signals to electrodes is known as pin assignment. Obviously, the pins that are assigned to electrodes must be chosen carefully as their actuation must still lead to the same droplet movements. This chapter will deal with the question of how to divide the electrodes into as few groups as possible that still allow to realize the intended movements of droplets when all electrodes in a group are actuated the same way. In Sect. 4.1, the problem is formally defined. Afterwards, in Sect. 4.2, it is proven that the problem of minimizing the number of pins is NP-complete. Section 4.3 reviews related work. Then, two different algorithms for determining such an assignment are presented in Sect. 4.4: one heuristic framework and one exact algorithm. Experimental results are presented in Sect. 4.5.

References

  1. [ALL]
    Advanced Liquid Logic. http://www.liquid-logic.com/
  2. [DYH15]
    Dinh TA, Yamashita S, Ho T-Y (2015) An optimal pin-count design with logic optimization for digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 34(4):629–641Google Scholar
  3. [GJ79]
    Garey MR, Johnson DS (1979) In: Klee V (ed) Computers and intractability. Books in the mathematical sciences, vol 29. W.H. Freeman and Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. [HHC11]
    Huang T-W, Ho T-Y, Chakrabarty K (2011) Reliability-oriented broadcast electrode-addressing for pin-constrained digital microfluidic biochips. In: International conference on computer aided design, pp 448–455Google Scholar
  5. [HSC06]
    Hwang W, Su F, Chakrabarty K (2006) Automated design of pin-constrained digital microfluidic arrays for Lab-on-a-Chip applications. In: Design automation conference, pp 925–930Google Scholar
  6. [Knu15]
    Knuth DE (2015) Satisfiability. Vol 4, fascicle 6. The art of computer programming. Addison Wesley, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. [LC13]
    Luo Y, Chakrabarty K (2013) Design of pin-constrained general-purpose digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 32(9):1307–1320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [SPF04]
    Srinivasan V, Pamula VK, Fair RB (2004) An integrated digital microfluidic lab-on-a-chip for clinical diagnostics on human physiological fluids. Lab Chip 4(4):310–315Google Scholar
  9. [XC06]
    Xu T, Chakrabarty K (2006) Droplet-trace-based array partitioning and a pin assignment algorithm for the automated design of digital microfluidic biochips. In: International conference on hardware/software codesign and system synthesis, pp 112–117Google Scholar
  10. [XC08]
    Xu T, Chakrabarty K (2008) Broadcast electrode-addressing for pin-constrained multi-functional digital microfluidic biochips. In: Design automation conference, pp 173–178Google Scholar
  11. [YH14]
    Yu ST, Ho T-Y (2014) Chip-level design for digital microfluidic biochips. Int J Autom Smart Technol 4(4):202–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. [ZC12]
    Zhao Y, Chakrabarty K (2012) Simultaneous optimization of droplet routing and control-pin mapping to electrodes in digital microfluidic biochips. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 31(2):242–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Oliver Keszocze
    • 1
  • Robert Wille
    • 2
  • Rolf Drechsler
    • 1
  1. 1.University of Bremen and DFKI GmbHBremenGermany
  2. 2.Johannes Kepler University LinzLinzAustria

Personalised recommendations