Skip to main content

How Should Social Engineers Develop Critical Social Science?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Impact of Critical Rationalism

Abstract

The most significant basic difference between the scientist and the engineer, Agassi and Jarvie have argued, is that the former seeks true explanations of reality, whereas the latter seeks effective control over it. Since control is often achievable with little or no understanding of underlying principles, this difference is of considerable methodological significance. Confusingly, however, Popper seems to have recommended to explorers of the social realms to limit themselves to piecemeal social engineering. Are social scientists engineers, or a crossbreed between engineers and scientists? Are their methodological challenges different from those of natural scientists proper? Jarvie’s work on technology and the social sciences explores the answers to these questions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See, for example, the interesting early collection of essays Applied Science and Technological Progress, published by The National Academy of Sciences in 1967, and especially C.S. Smith’s paper discussed in the following pages. See https://books.google.co.il/books?id=BTcrAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&dq=inauthor:%22National+Academy+of+Sciences#v=onepage&q&f=false.

  2. 2.

    Agassi (1971) argues that metaphysical frameworks render some generalizations of natural laws and other uninteresting trends. Would Popper concur? Let us assume that he would. Would this have led him to reformulate his abovementioned Section 27 of Poverty? It is extremely difficult to answer these questions.

References

  • Agassi, Joseph. 1971. What Is a Natural Law? Studium Generale 24: 1051–1066.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1974. The Confusion Between Science and Technology. In Contributions to a Philosophy of Technology, ed. F. Rapp, 40–60. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1985. Technology: Philosophical and Social Aspects. Dordrecht, Holland: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2003. The Impact of Auschwitz and Hiroshima on Scientific Culture (in Hebrew). In Conversation and Discourse, ed. Noa Naaman-Zauderer and Yaron Sanderowitz. Tel Aviv-Yafo: Tel Aviv University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agassi, Joseph, and Ian C. Jarvie. 1973. Magic and Rationality Again. The British Journal of Sociology 24: 236–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bar-Am, Nimrod. 2014. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 50th Anniversary Edition. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 44 (5): 688–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvie, Ian C. 1974. The Social Character of Technological Problems. In Contributions to a Philosophy of Technology, ed. Friedrich Rapp, 86–92. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1982. Popper on the Difference Between the Natural and the Social Sciences. In In Pursuit of Truth, ed. Paul Levinson, 83–107. New Jersey: Humanities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986. Thinking About Society: Theory and Practice. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polanyi, Michael. 1958. Personal Knowledge: Towards a Post-Critical Philosophy. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Karl R. 1945. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Vol. 2. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1961 [1957]. The Poverty of Historicism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Price, Derek. 1968. The Differences Between Science and Technology. Thomas Alva Edison Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rapp, Friedrich. 1974. Contributions to a Philosophy of Technology. Dordrecht, Holland: D. Reidel.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, Gilbert. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Cyril S. 1967. A Historical View of One Area of Applied Science—Metallurgy, Applied Science and Technological Progress, The National Academy of Sciences, 57–71.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bar-Am, N. (2019). How Should Social Engineers Develop Critical Social Science?. In: Sassower, R., Laor, N. (eds) The Impact of Critical Rationalism. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90826-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90825-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90826-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics