Advertisement

Public Interest and the Threat of Corruption: A Case for Civic Whistleblowing

  • Daniele Santoro
  • Manohar Kumar
Chapter
  • 338 Downloads
Part of the Philosophy and Politics - Critical Explorations book series (PPCE, volume 6)

Abstract

Political corruption is a fraudulent exchange for the mutual advantage between parties entrusted with public power, and whose costs bear on third parties who do not enjoy the benefit of that transaction. A defining feature of political corruption is that it affects the public interest of constituencies by diverting public funds for personal advantages, dumping the costs of diversion on the polity at large. In this chapter, we argue that the role of civic whistleblowing in the fight against corruption should be properly understood within a conception of public interest. In this chapter, we argue that whistleblowing contributes to the public interest when it exposes crimes that cause an unfair allocation of the burdens of cooperation.

Keywords

Accountability All-purposive rights The public Political corruption Public interest 

References

  1. Barry, Brian. 1965. Political Argument. New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
  2. Bentham, Jeremy. 1894. Principles of penal code. In Id. Theory of Legislation, 239–472. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trübner.Google Scholar
  3. Bodenheimer, Edgar. 1962. Prolegomena to a theory of the public interest. In The Public Interest, ed. Carl J. Friedrich, 205–217. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  4. Braybrooke, David. 1962. The public interest: The present and the future of the concept. In The Public Interest, ed. Carl J. Friedrich, 129–154. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  5. Brettschneider, Corey. 2007. Democratic Rights and the Substance of Self-Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  6. ———. 2011. Judicial review and democratic authority: Absolute v. balancing conceptions. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy. Symposium I. August 2011: 1–9.Google Scholar
  7. Cassinelli, C.W. 1962. The public interest in political ethics. In The Public Interest, ed. Carl J. Friedrich, 44–53. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ceva, Emanuela, and Maria Paola Ferretti. 2017. Political corruption, individual behaviour and the quality of institutions. Politics, Philosophy & Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X17732067.
  9. ———. 2018. Political Corruption. Philosophy Compass.Google Scholar
  10. Christiano, Thomas. 2008. The Constitution of Equality. Democratic Authority and Its Limits. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. ———. 2011. Reply to critics of the constitution of equality. Journal of Ethics & Social Philosophy. Symposium I. August 2011: 1–14.Google Scholar
  12. Dalla Porta, Donatella, and Alberto Vannucci. 1997. The ‘perverse effects’ of political corruption. Political Studies XLV: 516–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. De George, Richard. 2014. Whistleblowing. In Business Ethics: Readings and Cases in Corporate Morality, ed. Michael W. Hoffman, Robert E. Frederick, and Mark S. Schwartz, 320–338. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  14. Downs, Anthony. 1962. The public interest: Its meaning in a democracy. Social Research 29 (1): 1–36.Google Scholar
  15. Dworkin, Ronald. 2011. Justice for Hedgehogs. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Flathman, Richard J. 1966. The Public Interest: An Essay Concerning the Normative Discourse of Politics. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  17. Friedrich Carl J. 1962. The Public Interest. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  18. Global Financial Integrity. 2006–2018. Issues: Illicit Financial Flows. http://www.gfintegrity.org/issue/illicit-financial-flows/. Accessed 10 Feb 2018.
  19. Goodin, Robert E. 1996. Institutionalizing the public interest: The defense of deadlock and beyond. The American Political Science Review 90 (2): 331–343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Held, Virginia. 1970. The Public Interest and Individual Interests. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  21. King, Stephen M., Bradley S. Chilton, and Gary E. Roberts. 2010. Reflections on defining the public Interest. Administration & Society 41 (8): 954–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kurer, Oscar. 2015. Definitions of corruption. In Handbook of Political Corruption, ed. Paul M. Heywood, 30–41. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lasswell, Harold D. 1962. The public interest: Proposing principles of content and procedure. In The Public Interest, ed. Carl J. Friedrich, 54–79. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lessig, Lawrence. 2011. Republic, Lost: How Money Corrupts Congress—and a Plan to Stop It. New York/Boston: Twelve, Hachette Book Group.Google Scholar
  25. ———. 2013. ‘Institutional corruption’ defined. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 41 (3): 553–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lewis, George C. 1832. Remarks on the Use and Abuse of Some Political Terms. University of Missouri Press (reprinted 1970).Google Scholar
  27. Liberti, Stefano. 2014. Land Grabbing: Journeys in the New Colonialism. New York: Verso Books.Google Scholar
  28. Locke, John. 1988. Two Treatises of Government. London (1689), ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Madison, James, Alexander Hamilton, and John Jay. 1987. The Federalist Papers. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  30. O’Flynn, Ian. 2010. Deliberative democracy, the public interest and the Consociational model. Political Studies 58: 572–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. ———. 2014. Deliberating about the public interest. Res Publica 16 (3): 299–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pettit, Philip. 2004. The common good. In Justice and Democracy. Essays for Brian Barry, ed. Keith Dowding, Robert E. Goodin, and Carole Pateman, 150–169. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. ———. 2012. On the People’s Terms. A Republican Theory and Model of Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Philp, Mark. 2015. The definition of political corruption. In The Routledge Handbook of Political Corruption, ed. Paul M. Heywood, 17–29. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  35. Rawls, John. 1993. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  36. ———. 1999. A Theory of Justice (Rev. ed.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Santoro Daniele, and Federica Liveriero. 2017. Proceduralism and the epistemic dilemma of supreme courts. Social Epistemology 31 (3): 310–323.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2017.1317872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Souraf, Frank J. 1962. The conceptual muddle. In The Public Interest, ed. Carl J. Friedrich, 183–190. New York: Atherton Press.Google Scholar
  39. Thompson, Dennis F. 2013. Two Conceptions of Corruption. Edmond J. Safra Working Papers, No. 16. http://www.ethics.harvard.edu/lab. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  40. Transparency International. 2016. Corruption Perceptions Index 2015. https://www.transparency.org/cpi2015. Accessed 10 Mar 2018.
  41. ———. What Is Corruption?. http://www.transparency.org/what-is-corruption/. Accessed 15 Mar 2017.
  42. ———. 2018. Corruption Perceptions Index 2017. https://www.transparency.org/news/feature/corruption_perceptions_index_2017. Accessed 10 Mar 2018.
  43. Waldron, Jeremy. 2006. The core of the case against judicial review. Yale Law Journal 115 (6): 1346–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Warren, Mark E. 2015. The meaning of corruption in democracies. In Handbook of Political Corruption, ed. Paul M. Heywood, 42–55. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Daniele Santoro
    • 1
  • Manohar Kumar
    • 2
  1. 1.Centre for Ethics, Politics, and Society, ILCHUniversity of MinhoBragaPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Social Sciences and HumanitiesIndraprastha Institute of Information Technology, DelhiNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations