Skip to main content

Biomedicine and Bioethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Popular Culture and Biomedicine

Abstract

The historical development of so-called ‘biomedicine’ is closely linked to the rise and evolution of new ethical fields, such as bioethics and medical ethics. In this chapter, we explain what is understood by ‘biomedicine’ today, highlight the major steps in the development of biomedicine, and discuss its association with the evolution of basic ethical theories into applied ethical arguments. Both biomedicine and bioethics have left their traces and were transformed in popular cultural products, including games and film. We will show how bioethics and biomedicine can be used to analyse these products and reveal their potential contributions to actual debates about the problems, fears, and hopes associated with certain biomedical technologies — debates that are set within the triad of biomedicine, bioethical reasoning, and popular culture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Comparable to the synthesis of urea by Friedrich Wöhler.

  2. 2.

    E.g., Games such as Spec Ops: The Line, Battlefield 1 or This War of Mine are discussed in detail with regard to their ethical potential as ‘anti-war games’ by Nick Statt (2016). ‘Battlefield 1 is an anti-war message trapped in a best-selling shooter’, The Verge 06.11.2016 (http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/6/13529304/battlefield-1-anti-war-shooter-video-game-violence)., whereas ‘The Last of Us’ is analysed with regard to environmental issues by Amy Green (2016) ‘The Reconstruction of Morality and the Evolution of Naturalism in The Last of Us’, Games and Culture 11(7–8):745–63.

  3. 3.

    Suffering in its full philosophical conceptualisation requires, among other capacities, self-consciousness in order to reflect upon the experience (feeling) of pain or injury.

  4. 4.

    Not like, e.g., the ents in the novel (and film adaptations of) Lord of the Rings by J. R. R. Tolkien: these beings can move freely and choose their affiliations, and are, therefore, more human-like in character.

References

  • Abir-Am, Pnina G. 2002. The Rockefeller Foundation and the rise of molecular biology. Nature Reviews Molecular Biology 3: 65–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amsterdamska, Olga. 2004. Research at the hospital of the Rockefeller Institute for medical research. In Creating a tradition of biomedical research: Contributions to the history of the Rockefeller University, ed. D.H. Stapleton, 111–126. New York: Rockefeller University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, David. 1988. Space and time in British general practice. In Biomedicine examined, ed. M. Lock and D.R. Gordon, 207–225. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2013. Principles of biomedical ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentham, Jeremy. 2007 [1789]. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. New York: Dover philosophical classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn, Simon. 2003. Being good. A short introduction to ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bolt, Timo. 2015. A doctor’s order. The Dutch case of evidence-based medicine (1970–2015). Antwerp: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadie, Sarah, and Christopher J. Rowe. 2002. Aristotle, Nicomachean ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charpa, Ulrich. 2012. Synthetic biology and the golem of Prague: Philosophical reflections on a suggestive metaphor. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 55 (4): 554–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, Adele E., Janet K. Shim, Laura Mamo, Jennifer Ruth Fosket, and Jennifer R. Fishman. 2003. Biomedicalization: Technoscientific transformations of health, illness, and U.S. biomedicine. American Sociological Review 68 (2): 161–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dans, Peter. 2000. Doctors in the movies: Boil the water and just say aah. Bloomington: Medi-Ed Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorland, William Alexander Newman. 1923. The American illustrated medical dictionary. Philadelphia: W. B. Saunders.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, Richard. 2012. The medialization of regenerative medicine: Frames and metaphors in UK news stories. In The sciences’ media connection –public communication and its repercussions, ed. S. Rödder, M. Franzen, and P. Weingart, 87–105. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Fangerau, Heiner. 2012. Monism, racial hygiene, and national socialism. In Monism. Science, philosophy, religion, and the history of a worldview, ed. T. Weir, 223–247. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2016. Tierforschung unter mechanistischen Vorzeichen. Jacques Loeb, Tropismen und das Vordenken des Behaviorismus. In Philosophie der Tierforschung Band 1: Methoden und Programme, ed. M. Böhnert, K. Köchy, and M. Wunsch, 183–207. München: Karl Alber Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2017. Experimental biology and the biomedical ideal around the year 1900. In Vivarium. Experimental, quantitative, and theoretical biology at Vienna’s Biologische Versuchsanstalt, ed. G.B. Müller, 77–94. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Flanagan, Mary, and Helen Fay Nissenbaum. 2014. Values at play in digital games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaudillière, Jean-Paul. 2002. Inventer la biomédecine: la France, l’ Amérique et la production des savoirs du vivant (1945–1965). Paris: Éd. La Découverte.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gert, Bernard. 1998. Morality – its nature and justification. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Görgen, Arno, and Matthis Krischel. 2012. Dystopien von Medizin und Wissenschaft: Retro-Science-Fiction und die Kritik an der Technikgläubigkeit der Moderne im Computerspiel BioShock. In eds. Fraunholz U and Woschech A, 271–288. Bielefeld: transcript. In Technology fiction: Technische Visionen und Utopien in der Hochmoderne, 271–88. Bielefeld: Transcript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Green, Amy M. 2016. The reconstruction of morality and the evolution of naturalism in the last of us. Games and Culture 11 (7–8): 745–763.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregor, Mary, and Jens Timmermann. 2011. Groundworks of the metaphysics od morals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, Bert. 2009. Picturing medical progress from Pasteur to polio: A history of mass media images and popular attitudes in America. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holody, Kyle J., Christina Anderson, Clay Craig, and Mark Flynn. 2016. “Drunk in love”: The portrayal of risk behavior in music lyrics. Journal of Health Communication 21 (10): 1098–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huxley, Thomas Henry. 1881. An address on the connection of the biological sciences with medicine. British Medical Journal 2 (1076): 273–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Naomi. 2003. Posthuman bodies and agency in Octavia Butler’s ‘Xenogenesis. In Dark horizons: Science fiction and the dystopian imagination, ed. R. Baccolini and T. Moylan, 91–111. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keating, Peter, and Alberto Cambrosio. 2003. Biomedical platforms: Realigning the normal and the pathological in late-twentieth-century medicine. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2004. Does biomedicine entail the successful reduction of pathology to biology? Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 47 (3): 357–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LaFollette, Hugh, and Ingmar Persson. 2013. The blackwell guide to ethical theory. 2nd ed. West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lella, Joseph W., and Dorothy Pawluch. 1988. Medical students and the cadaver in social and cultural context. In Biomedicine examined, ed. M. Lock and D.R. Gordon, 125–153. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lenoir, Timothy. 1999. Shaping biomedicine as an information science. In Proceedings of the 1998 conference on the history and heritage of science information systems, ed. M.E. Bowden, T.B. Hahn, and R.V. Williams, 27–45. Medford: Information Today.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, Thomas. 1977. Biomedical science and human health: The long-range prospect. Daedalus 106 (3): 163–171.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lock, Margaret. 1988. Introduction. In Biomedicine examined, ed. M. Lock and D.R. Gordon, 3–10. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2007. The future is now: Locating biomarkers for dementia. In Biomedicine as culture. Instrumental practices, technoscientific knowledge, and new modes of life, ed. R.V. Burri and J. Dumit, 61–85. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwy, Ilana. 2011. Historiography of biomedicine: “Bio,” “medicine,” and in between. Isis 102 (1): 116–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lupton, Deborah. 2012. Medicine as culture: Illness, disease and the body. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macer, Darryl R.J. 2008. Moral games for teaching bioethics. Haifa: UNESCO Chair in Bioethics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, Angela, Amelie Cserer, and Markus Schmidt. 2013. Frankenstein 2.0.: Identifying and characterising synthetic biology engineers in science fiction films. Life Sciences, Society and Policy 9 (1): 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, John, and José Zagal. 2011. Video games and the ethics of care., 3, 69–81. International Journal of Gaming and Computer-Mediated Simulations 3 (3): 69–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha. 1999. Sex and social justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2011. Creating capabilities – the human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Oudshoorn, Nelly, and André Somers. 2007. Constructing the digital patient: Patient organizations and the development of health websites. In Biomedicine as culture. Instrumental practices, technoscientific knowledge, and new modes of life, ed. R.V. Burri and J. Dumit, 205–222. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Primack, Brian A., Madeline A. Dalton, Mary V. Carroll, Aaron A. Agarwal, and Michael J. Fine. 2008. Content analysis of tobacco, alcohol, and other drugs in popular music. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 162 (2): 169–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quirke, Vivian, and Jean-Paul Gaudillière. 2008. The era of biomedicine: Science, medicine, and public health in Britain and France after the Second World War. Medical History 52: 441–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, Robin W., and Bruno J. Strasser. 2015. Biomedical sciences and technology: History and sociology of. In International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences, ed. J.D. Wright, 2nd ed., 663–669. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schrier, Karen, and David Gibson, eds. 2010. Ethics and game design: Teaching values through play. Hershey: Information Science Reference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulzke, Marcus. 2013. The bioethics of digital utopias. International Journal of Technoethics 4 (2): 46–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, Amartya. 1993. Capability and well-being. In The quality of life, ed. A. Sen and M. Nussbaum, 30–53. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sicart, Miguel. 2009. Ethics of computer games. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stapleton, Darwin H. 2004. Creating a tradition of biomedical research: Contributions to the history of the Rockefeller University. New York: The Rockefeller University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Statt, Nick. 2016. Battlefield 1 is an anti-war message trapped in a best-selling shooter, The Verge 06.11.2016. http://www.theverge.com/2016/11/6/13529304/battlefield-1-anti-war-shooter-video-game-violence.

  • Strasser, Bruno J. 2014. Biomedicine: Meanings, assumptions, and possible futures. Report to the Swiss Science and Innovation Council (SSIC) 1/2014. Bern: Swiss Science and Innovation Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turney, Jon. 1995. Life in the laboratory: Public responses to experimental biology. Public Understanding of Science 4 (2): 153–176.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warner, John Harley. 2013. The humanizing power of medical history: Responses to biomedicine in the 20th-century United States. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 77: 322–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welch, William H. 1906. The unity of the medical sciences. Science 24 (615): 454–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Media

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Heiner Fangerau .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fangerau, H., Badura-Lotter, G. (2019). Biomedicine and Bioethics. In: Görgen, A., Nunez, G.A., Fangerau, H. (eds) Handbook of Popular Culture and Biomedicine. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90677-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90677-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90676-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90677-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics