Advertisement

Popular Narratives of the Cochlear Implant

  • Anna Grebe
  • Robert StockEmail author
  • Markus Spöhrer
Chapter

Abstract

In contemporary medical discourse as well as in the field of Disability Studies, the problems concerning the Cochlear implant (CI) gave rise to a series of controversies. While medical discourses or viscourses imply a natural process of hearing, the counterargument is that “normal hearing” is a social and cultural construction, which depends on a corresponding “thought style”. However, such constructions of normality, disability, inclusion and exclusion are not only produced or criticized by scientific or journalistic mediatizations but also to a large degree by popular narrative media. Consequently, this paper analyzes the specific filmic-narrative appropriation, reworking and interpretation of discourses on the CI in popular media formations such as TV series, medical-technological viscourses in documentaries and Youtube videos. The thesis is that narrative media cannot be considered a mere reproduction of scientific or social discourses, but instead functions as productions of reality. Thus, narrative media is capable of (co)producing (in mutual exchange with social and medical discourses) interpretations, evaluations of normality and disability.

References

  1. Allrath, G., and G. Gymnich. 2005. Narrative strategies in television series. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bergermann, Ulrike. 2000. Von der Verbesserung des Menschen: Cyborgs und CIs zur Zeit der Expo. Das Zeichen 53: 386–393.Google Scholar
  3. Bondarew, V., and P. Seligman. 2012. The cochlear story. Collingwood: CSIRO.Google Scholar
  4. Bradley, R.N. 2015. SANDRA BLAND: #SayHerName loud or not at all. Sounding Out. Available at https://soundstudiesblog.com/2015/11/16/sandra-bland-sayhername-loud/. Accessed 19 Apr 2016.
  5. Brueggemann, B.J. 1999. Lend me your ear: Rhetroical constructions of deafness. Washington, DC: Gallaudet.Google Scholar
  6. Brunsdon, C. 1990. Television: Aesthetics and audiences. In Logics of television. Essays in cultural criticism, ed. P. Mellencamp, 59–72. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, F. 2003 The great divide. Ableism and technologies of disability production. PhD thesis, Queensland University of Technology. Available at: http://eprints.qut.edu.au/15889/1/Fiona_Campbell_Thesis.pdf. Accessed 19 Apr 2016.
  8. Chaikof, R. 2008. How much better is the acceptance today? Cochlear Implant Online. Available at: http://cochlearimplantonline.com/site/how-much-better-is-the-acceptance-today/. Accessed 30 Sept 2013.
  9. Clark, G. 2003. Cochlear implants: Fundamentals and application. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Creeber, G. 2004. Serial television: Big drama on the small screen. London: BFI Publishing.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, L.J. 1995. Introduction. Disability, the missing term in the race, class, gender triad. In Enforcing normalcy. Disability, deafness, and the body, ed. L.J. Davis, 1–22. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 2013. The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge. 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dussling, S. 2010. Sunny and her cochlear implants. Bloomington: AUTHORHOUSE.Google Scholar
  14. Ellis, K., and M. Kent. 2011. Disability and new media. New York: Routledge. 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Felando, C. 2015. Discovering short films: The history and style of live-action fiction shorts. New York: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleck, L. 1980. Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einführung in die Lehre vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
  17. Geraghty, C. 2003. Aesthetics and quality on popular television drama. International Journal of Cultural Studies 6 (25): 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hermann-Röttgen, M. 2010. Cochlea-Implantat: Ein Ratgeber für Betroffene und Therapeuten. Stuttgart: Trias.Google Scholar
  19. Knorr-Cetina, K. 1999. Viskurse der Physik: Wie visuelle Darstellungen ein Wissenschaftsgebiet ordnen. In Konstruktionen Sichtbarkeiten, ed. J. Huber and M. Heller, 245–263. Wien: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Kollien, S. 2000. Das Cochlea-Implantat aus Sicht der Gehörlosen. Wissenschaft-Online. Available at: http://www.wissenschaft-online.de/page/fe_seiten?article_id=570923. Accessed 29 Sept 2013).
  21. Kupfer, W., and T. Lyon. 2012. Let’s hear it for Almigal. Delray Beach: Handfinger Pr Llc.Google Scholar
  22. Ladd, P. 2003. Understanding deaf culture: In search of Deafhood. Clevedon: Multilingual.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mager, W. 2013. Switching on my hearing – William’s cochlear implant story. BBC Ouch! It’s a disability thing. Available at: http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/legacy/ouch/2013/01/switching_on_my_hearing_-_will.html. Accessed 17 Dec 2014.
  24. Marcus, L. 2014. Why you shouldn’t share those emotional ‘Deaf Person Hears for the First Time’ videos. The Wire. What Matters Now. Available at: http://www.thewire.com/politics/2014/03/why-you-shouldnt-share-those-emotional-deaf-person-hears-for-the-first-time-videos/359850/. Accessed 1 Dec 2014.
  25. Mills, P. 2010. Hymns to the silence. Inside the music and lyrics of Van Morrison. London: Continuum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mittell, J. 2006. Narrative complexity in contemporary American television. The Velvet Light Trap 58 (1): 29–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Newman, M. 2006. From beats to arcs: Toward a poetics of television narrative. The Velvet Light Trap 58 (1): 16–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ochsner, B. 2013. Teilhabeprozesse oder: Das Versprechen des Cochlea-Implantats. AUGENblick: Konstanzer Hefte zur Medienwissenschaft 58: 112–123.Google Scholar
  29. Ochsner, B. 2017. Documenting neuropolitics: Cochlear implant activation videos. In Documentary and disability, ed. C. Brylla and H. Hughes, 259–274. London: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ochsner, B., M. Spöhrer, and R. Stock. 2015. Human, nonhuman, and beyond: Cochlear implants in socio-technological environments. NanoEthics 9 (3): 237–250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rao, H. 2009. Market rebels: How activists make or break radical innovations. Oxford: Princeton.Google Scholar
  32. Richards, V. 2016. Boyfriend proposes to deaf woman hearing for first time in emotional video. Independent. March, 17. Available at: http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/deaf-woman-cochlear-implant-hearing-first-time-boyfriend-proposes-emotional-video-mississippi-a6936681.html. Accessed 18 Apr 2016.
  33. Romoff, A. 1999. Hear again: Back to life with a cochlear implant. New York: League for the Hard of Hearing.Google Scholar
  34. Rose, M.C. 2013. Kylie gets a cochlear implant. Houston: Strategic.Google Scholar
  35. Schlenker-Schulte, C., and A. Weber. 2009. Teilhabe durch barrierefreie Kommunikation für Menschen mit Hörbehinderung. In Rhetorik: Ein internationales Jahrbuch. Rhetorik und Verständlichkeit, ed. G. Antos, 92–102. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
  36. Shakespeare, T. 2006. The social model of disability. In The disability studies reader, ed. L. Davis, 197–204. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Sparrow, R. 2005. Defending deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants. Journal of Political Philosophy 13 (2): 135–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2010. Implants and ethnocide: Learning from the cochlear implant controversy. Disability and Society 25 (4): 455–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Spöhrer, M. 2013a. Bilder der gelungenen Kommunikation: Das Cochlea-Implantat in sozialen und medizinischen Denkkollektiven. Das Zeichen 95: 382–389.Google Scholar
  40. ———. 2013b. The (re-)socialization of technical objects in patient networks: The case of the cochlear implant. International Journal of Actor-Network Theory and Technological Innovation 5 (3): 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Spöhrer, M. 2017. A cyborg perspective: The cochlear implant and actor-networking perception. In Applying the actor-network theory in media studies, ed. M. Spöhrer, and B. Ochsner, 80–95. Hershey.Google Scholar
  42. Thompson, R.J. 1996. Television’s second golden age. Syracuse: University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Watson, L.M., and S. Gregory. 2005. Non-use of cochlear implants in children: Child and parent perspectives. Deafness and Education International 7 (1): 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Wilson, B.S., and M.F. Dorman. 2009. The design of cochlear implants. In Cochlear implants: Principles & practices, ed. J.K. Niparko, 95–135. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins.Google Scholar
  45. Zeng, F.G. 2004. Compression and cochlear implants. In Compression: From cochlea to cochlear implants, ed. S.P. Bacon, R.R. Fay, and A.N. Popper, 184–220. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Media

  1. Churman, S. 2014. Hearing for the first time. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LsOo3jzkhYA. Accessed 23 April 2018.
  2. Deer Prom. 2014. Man hears for the first time. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IedGs6Y4kLE. Accessed 23 April 2018.
  3. The Ellen Show. 2014. Sarah Churman. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fp4usWroDew. Accessed 23 April 2018.
  4. Switched at Birth. Creat. Weiss L. Pirates’ Cove Entertainment; Freeform Original Productions. 2011–2017.Google Scholar
  5. The Telegraph. 2014. Video: Profoundly deaf woman hears for first time. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/10727693/Profoundlydeaf-woman-hears-for-first-time.html. Accessed 23 April 2018.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Independent ResearcherBerlinGermany
  2. 2.University of KonstanzKonstanzGermany

Personalised recommendations