Advertisement

Faith-Based Persistence and Permutations

  • John P. Bartkowski
  • Susan E. Grettenberger
Chapter

Abstract

Faith-based initiatives first entered the American lexicon over two decades ago, and the practice of government has been significantly altered ever since. This initiative’s genesis, effectively Faith-Based 1.0, formally began under Charitable Choice, a provision in 1996’s Welfare Reform Law. This provision offered clients of government funded job placement, housing, food distribution, and other programs the choice of receiving services from a faith-based or secular provider. It also reversed the longstanding requirement for faith-based organizations to secularize themselves before becoming eligible to bid for government service contracts.

References

  1. Ammerman, Nancy Tatom. 2005. Pillars of faith: American congregations and their partners. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bartkowski, John P., and Helen A. Regis. 2003. Charitable choices: Religion, race, and poverty in the post-welfare era. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boorstein, Michelle, and Kimberly Kindy. 2009. Faith-based office to expand its reach. The Washington Post, February 6. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/02/05/AR2009020500834.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.
  4. Boorstein, Michelle, and William Wan. 2010. Religious leaders worry that Obama’s faith council is for show. The Washington Post, February 3. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/02/02/AR2010020203770.html?sid=ST2010020301568. Accessed 3 Dec 2016.
  5. Brownstein, Alan E. 1999. Interpreting the religion clauses in terms of liberty, equality, and free speech values—A critical analysis of “neutrality theory” and Charitable Choice. Notre Dame Journal of Law, Ethics & Public Policy 13: 243–284.Google Scholar
  6. Chaves, Mark. 1999. Religious congregations and welfare reform: Who will take advantage of “Charitable Choice?” American Sociological Review 64: 834–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaves, Mark, and Bob Wineburg. 2010. Did the faith-based initiative change congregations? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 39: 343–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cnaan, Ram A., C. Boddie Stephanie, Femida Handy, Gaynor Yancey, and Richard Schneider. 2002. The invisible caring hand: American congregations and the provision of welfare. New York: University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Craig, Tim, and Michelle Boorstein. 2009. Catholic Church gives D.C. ultimatum. The Washington Post. November 12, 2016. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/11/11/AR2009111116943.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.
  10. Ebaugh, Helen Rose, Paula F. Pipes, Janet Saltzman Chafetz, and Martha Daniels. 2003. Where’s the religion? Distinguishing faith-based from secular social service agencies. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 42: 411–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eschliman, Bob. 2016. Donald Trump launches new faith-based advisory committee. Charisma News. September 23. http://www.charismanews.com/politics/elections/60126-donald-trump-launches-new-faith-based-advisory-committee. Accessed 11 Jan 2017.
  12. Glueck, Katie. 2017. Trump’s religious deal making pays dividends. Politico. December 7. http://www.politico.com/story/2016/12/trump-religious-dealmaking-dividends-232277. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.
  13. Jeavons, Thomas H. 2004. Religious and faith-based organizations: Do we know one when we see one? Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33: 140–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kennedy, Sheila Suess, and Wolfgang Bielefeld. 2002. Government shekels without government shackles? The administrative challenges of Charitable Choice. Public Administration Review 62: 4–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Monsma, Stephen V. 2004. Putting faith in partnerships: Welfare-to-work in four cities. Ann Arbor, Mich.: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Montgomery, Peter. 2017. Ted Cruz Lost, but Trump is giving the religious right his cabinet. The Advocate. January 4. http://www.advocate.com/commentary/2017/1/04/ted-cruz-lost-trump-giving-religious-right-his-cabinet. Accessed 12 Jan 2017.
  17. Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth. 2006a. Charitable Choice: Religiöse Institutionalisierung Im Öffentlichen Raum. Hamburg: Lit Verlag.Google Scholar
  18. Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth. 2006b. Charitable Choice: The religious component of the US welfare reform—Theoretical and methodological reflections on “Faith-Based Organisations” as social service agencies. Numen 53: 78–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth. 2010. Public religion and state transformation: zero-sum game or fruitful partnership? Journal of Religion in Europe 3: 323–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Nagel, Alexander-Kenneth. 2013. Agents, armies, allies: Semantics of public-private partnerships in US welfare reform. Journal of Religion in Europe 6: 175–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Nathan, Richard P., and Thomas L. Gais. 1999. Implementing the Personal Responsibility Act of 1996: A first look. Albany, New York: The Nelson A. Rockefeller Institute of Government.Google Scholar
  22. Poggioli, Sylvia. 2017. Steve Bannon aligns with Vatican hard-liners who oppose Pope Francis. National Public Radio, February 8. http://www.npr.org/sections/parallels/2017/02/08/514102356/steve-bannon-aligns-with-vatican-hardliners-who-oppose-pope-francis. Accessed 8 Feb 2017.
  23. Poole, Dennis L. 2003. Scaling up CBOs for second-order devolution in welfare reform. Nonprofit Management & Leadership 13: 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sager, Rebecca. 2010. Faith, politics, and power: The politics of faith-based initiatives. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Shellnutt, Kate, and Sarah Eekhoff Zylstra. 2016. Who’s who of Trump’s “tremendous” faith advisors. Christianity Today. June 22. http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2016/june-web-only/whos-who-of-trumps-tremendous-faith-advisors.html. Accessed 22 Dec 2016.
  26. Smith, Steven Rathgeb, and Michael R. Sosin. 2001. The varieties of faith-related agencies. Public Administration Review 61: 651–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Smith, Gregory A., and Jessica Martinez. 2016. How the faithful voted: A preliminary 2016 analysis. Pew Research Center. November 9. http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2016/11/09/how-the-faithful-voted-a-preliminary-2016-analysis/. Accessed 2 Jan 2017.
  28. Sider, Ronald J., and Heidi Rolland Unruh. 2004. Typology of religious characteristics of social service and educational organizations and programs. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 33: 109–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sommer, Allison Kaplan. 2016. Onward Christian cabinet: Trump’s White House picks are a Christmas gift for the religious right. Haaretz. December 14. http://www.haaretz.com/us-news/.premium-1.758733. Accessed 12 Jan 2017.
  30. Towey, Jim. 2016. Obama’s sustained assault on religious liberty is finally over. National Review. December 12. http://www.nationalreview.com/article/442939/religious-freedom-conscience-rights-obama-administration-hillary-clinton-donald-trump. Accessed 22 Dec 2016.
  31. Unruh, Heidi Rolland, and Ronald J. Sider. 2005. Saving souls, serving society: Understanding the faith factor in church-based social ministry. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Waters, David. 2010. Obama’s faith-based inertia. The Washington Post. February 9. http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/undergod/2010/02/obamas_faith-based_inertia.html. Accessed 3 Nov 2016.
  33. Weber, Max. 1978. Economy and society. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  34. Wineburg, Bob. 2007. Faith-based inefficiency: The follies of Bush’s initiative. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  35. Wuthnow, Robert. 2004. Saving America? Faith-based services and the future of Civil Society. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyThe University of Texas at San AntonioSan AntonioUSA
  2. 2.Department of Sociology, Anthropology and Social WorkCentral Michigan UniversityMount PleasantUSA

Personalised recommendations