Skip to main content
Book cover

Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XV pp 89–104Cite as

Lexicase Selection with Weighted Shuffle

Part of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation book series (GEVO)

Abstract

Semantic-aware methods in genetic programming take into account information about programs’ performances across a set of test cases. Lexicase parent selection, a semantic-aware selection, randomly shuffles the list of test cases and places more emphasis on those test cases that randomly appear earlier in the ordering than those that appear later in the ordering. In this work, we explore methods for weighting this shuffling of test cases to give some test cases more influence over selection than others. We design and test a variety of weighted shuffle algorithms and methods for weighting test cases. In experiments on two program synthesis benchmark problems, we find that none of these methods significantly outperform regular lexicase selection. We analyze these results by examining how each method affects population diversity, and find that those methods that perform much worse also have significantly lower diversity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-90512-9_6
  • Chapter length: 16 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-319-90512-9
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 6.1
Fig. 6.2
Fig. 6.3

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://github.com/lspector/Clojush.

References

  1. Burks, A.R., Punch, W.F.: An investigation of hybrid structural and behavioral diversity methods in genetic programming. In: Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XIV, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Springer, Ann Arbor, USA (2016), in press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Data.random.shuffle.weighted. https://hackage.haskell.org/package/random-extras-0.19/docs/Data-Random-Shuffle-Weighted.html. Accessed: 2017-05-01

  3. Drury, M.: Does this discrete distribution have a name? Cross Validated. URL https://stats.stackexchange.com/q/152786. Accessed: 2017-11-25

  4. Helmuth, T.: General program synthesis from examples using genetic programming with parent selection based on random lexicographic orderings of test cases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst (2015). URL http://scholarworks.umass.edu/dissertations_2/465/

  5. Helmuth, T., McPhee, N.F., Spector, L.: Lexicase selection for program synthesis: A diversity analysis. In: Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XIII, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 151–167. Springer, Ann Arbor, USA (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-34223-8. URL http://cs.wlu.edu/~helmuth/Pubs/2015-GPTP-lexicase-diversity-analysis.pdf

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Helmuth, T., McPhee, N.F., Spector, L.: Effects of lexicase and tournament selection on diversity recovery and maintenance. In: GECCO ‘16 Companion: Proceedings of the Companion Publication of the 2016 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 983–990. ACM, Denver, Colorado, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2908961.2931657

  7. Helmuth, T., McPhee, N.F., Spector, L.: The impact of hyperselection on lexicase selection. In: T. Friedrich (ed.) GECCO ‘16: Proceedings of the 2016 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 717–724. ACM, Denver, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2908812.2908851

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Helmuth, T., Spector, L.: General program synthesis benchmark suite. In: GECCO ‘15: Proceedings of the 2015 on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, pp. 1039–1046. ACM, Madrid, Spain (2015). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2739480.2754769

  9. Helmuth, T., Spector, L., Matheson, J.: Solving uncompromising problems with lexicase selection. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 19(5), 630–643 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TEVC.2014.2362729

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Helmuth, T., Spector, L., McPhee, N.F., Shanabrook, S.: Linear genomes for structured programs. In: Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XIV, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Springer, Ann Arbor, USA (2016), in press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jackson, D.: Promoting phenotypic diversity in genetic programming. In: PPSN 2010 11th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6239, pp. 472–481. Springer, Krakow, Poland (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_48

    Google Scholar 

  12. Klein, J., Spector, L.: Genetic programming with historically assessed hardness. In: Genetic Programming Theory and Practice VI, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, chap. 5, pp. 61–75. Springer, Ann Arbor (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-87623-8_5

  13. Krawiec, K., Lichocki, P.: Using co-solvability to model and exploit synergetic effects in evolution. In: PPSN 2010 11th International Conference on Parallel Problem Solving From Nature, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6239, pp. 492–501. Springer, Krakow, Poland (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-15871-1_50

    Google Scholar 

  14. Krawiec, K., Nawrocki, M.: Implicit fitness sharing for evolutionary synthesis of license plate detectors. In: Applications of Evolutionary Computing, EvoApplications 2012, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7835, pp. 376–386. Springer, Vienna, Austria (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37192-9_38

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  15. Krawiec, K., O’Reilly, U.M.: Behavioral programming: A broader and more detailed take on semantic GP. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, GECCO ‘14, pp. 935–942. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2014). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2576768.2598288

  16. Krawiec, K., Swan, J., O’Reilly, U.M.: Behavioral program synthesis: Insights and prospects. In: Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XIII, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Series, pp. 169–183. Springer (2015)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. La Cava, W., Moore, J.: A general feature engineering wrapper for machine learning using epsilon-lexicase survival. In: M. Castelli, J. McDermott, L. Sekanina (eds.) EuroGP 2017: Proceedings of the 20th European Conference on Genetic Programming, LNCS, vol. 10196, pp. 80–95. Springer Verlag, Amsterdam (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55696-3_6

    Google Scholar 

  18. La Cava, W., Spector, L., Danai, K.: Epsilon-lexicase selection for regression. In: T. Friedrich (ed.) GECCO ‘16: Proceedings of the 2016 Annual Conference on Genetic and Evolutionary Computation, pp. 741–748. ACM, Denver, USA (2016). https://doi.org/10.1145/2908812.2908898

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Liskowski, P., Krawiec, K., Helmuth, T., Spector, L.: Comparison of semantic-aware selection methods in genetic programming. In: C. Johnson, K. Krawiec, A. Moraglio, M. O’Neill (eds.) GECCO 2015 Semantic Methods in Genetic Programming (SMGP’15) Workshop, pp. 1301–1307. ACM, Madrid, Spain (2015). http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2739482.2768505

    Google Scholar 

  20. McKay, R.I.: Fitness sharing in genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2000), pp. 435–442. Morgan Kaufmann, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McPhee, N.F., Finzel, M., Casale, M.M., Helmuth, T., Spector, L.: A detailed analysis of a PushGP run. In: Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XIV, Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Springer, Ann Arbor, USA (2016), in press (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  22. McPhee, N.F., Ohs, B., Hutchison, T.: Semantic building blocks in genetic programming. In: Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Genetic Programming, EuroGP 2008, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 4971, pp. 134–145. Springer, Naples (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Moraglio, A., Krawiec, K., Johnson, C.G.: Geometric semantic genetic programming. In: Parallel Problem Solving from Nature, PPSN XII (part 1), Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 7491, pp. 21–31. Springer, Taormina, Italy (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Spector, L.: Autoconstructive evolution: Push, PushGP, and Pushpop. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO-2001), pp. 137–146. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, California, USA (2001). URL http://hampshire.edu/lspector/pubs/ace.pdf

  25. Spector, L.: Assessment of problem modality by differential performance of lexicase selection in genetic programming: a preliminary report. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth international conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation conference companion, GECCO Companion ‘12, pp. 401–408. ACM, New York, NY, USA (2012). https://doi.org/10.1145/2330784.2330846

  26. Spector, L., Klein, J., Keijzer, M.: The Push3 execution stack and the evolution of control. In: GECCO 2005: Proceedings of the 2005 conference on Genetic and evolutionary computation, pp. 1689–1696. ACM Press, Washington DC, USA (2005). https://doi.org/10.1145/1068009.1068292. URL http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~wbl/biblio/gecco2005/docs/p1689.pdf

Download references

Acknowledgements

Hammad Ahmad, Lee Spector, and Nicholas Freitag McPhee shared interesting discussions that were very helpful in conducting this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Washington and Lee University, Lexington, VA, USA

    Sarah Anne Troise

  2. Hamilton College, Clinton, NY, USA

    Thomas Helmuth

Authors
  1. Sarah Anne Troise
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Thomas Helmuth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Helmuth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. BEACON Center for the Study of Evolution in Action and Department of Computer Science, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, USA

    Wolfgang Banzhaf

  2. Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

    Randal S. Olson

  3. Institute for Biomedical Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

    William Tozier

  4. Center for the Study of Complex Systems, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

    Dr. Rick Riolo

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Troise, S.A., Helmuth, T. (2018). Lexicase Selection with Weighted Shuffle. In: Banzhaf, W., Olson, R., Tozier, W., Riolo, R. (eds) Genetic Programming Theory and Practice XV. Genetic and Evolutionary Computation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90512-9_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90512-9_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90511-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90512-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)