Plant–Human Hybridity in the Story World of Kubbe

Chapter
Part of the Critical Approaches to Children's Literature book series (CRACL)

Abstract

Drawing on posthuman theorists Donna Haraway, N. Katherine Hayles and Rosi Braidotti and on recent plant theory, Guanio-Uluru in this chapter provides a multi-faceted analysis of the story world of Kubbe, developed by Norwegian picturebook author and illustrator Åshild Kanstad Johnsen. The narratives’ main character, Kubbe, is a log of wood with anthropomorphic features and thus a representation of the figure of child and nature as one. Examining Kubbe and his environment through comparison with Carlo Collodi’s character of Pinocchio and with the Aristotelian view of plant capacities, Guanio-Uluru argues that the immediately idyllic view of plant–human relationships in Johnson’s story world is problematized in particular in light of plant theory.

Works Cited

  1. Barrie, J. M. (2007). Peter Pan. New York: Barnes and Noble Classics.Google Scholar
  2. Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  3. Christensen, N. (2016). Overgange. Passage, 75, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
  4. Collodi, C. (2014). The Adventures of Pinocchio. Surrey: Templar Publishing.Google Scholar
  5. Frazer, J. G. (2009). The Golden Bough: A New Abridgement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Goga, N. (2017). I begynnelsen var treet. Nordic Journal of ChildLit Aesthetics, 8.Google Scholar
  7. Guanio-Uluru, L. (2015). Ethics and Form in Fantasy Literature: Tolkien, Rowling and Meyer. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  8. Hallberg, K. (1982). Litteraturvetenskapen och bilderboksforskningen. Tidskrift för litteraturvetenskap (3–4), pp. 163–168.Google Scholar
  9. Haraway, D. (1991). A Cyborg Manifesto: Science, Technology, and Socialist-Feminism in the Late Twentieth Century. Simians, Cyborgs and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. Routledge, pp. 149–181.Google Scholar
  10. Haraway, D. (2016). Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hayles, N. K. (1999). How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hayles, N. K. (2017). Unthought: The Power of the Cognitive Nonconscious. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Jaques, Z. (2015). Posthumanism and Children’s Literature: Animal, Environment, Cyborg. New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  14. Jenkins, H. (2007). Transmedia Storytelling. Available at: http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2007/03/transmedia_storytelling_101.html [Accessed 23 February 2016].
  15. Johnsen, Åshild Kanstad. (2010). Kubbe lager museum. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  16. Johnsen, Åshild Kanstad. (2011). Kubbe lager spetakkel. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  17. Johnsen, Åshild Kanstad. (2013a). Kubbes album om alt. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  18. Johnsen, Åshild Kanstad. (2013b). Kubbe rydder opp. Oslo: Gyldendal and Ciber.Google Scholar
  19. Johnsen, Åshild Kanstad. (2013c). Kubbe lager skyggeteater. Oslo: Gyldendal and Ciber.Google Scholar
  20. Laist, R. (2013). Plants and Literature: Essays in Critical Plant Studies. Amsterdam, NY: Rodopi.Google Scholar
  21. Le Guin, U. K. (1986). The Carrier Bag Theory of Fiction. In: Dancing at the Edge of the World. New York: Grove, pp. 165–170.Google Scholar
  22. Lima, M. (2013). The Book of Trees: Visualizing Branches of Knowledge. New York: Princeton Architectural Press.Google Scholar
  23. Lindgren, A. (2015). The Best of Pippi Longstocking. Ill. Tony Ross. Oxford: University of Oxford Press.Google Scholar
  24. Maitland, S. (2012). Gossip from the Forest: The Tangled Roots of Our Forests and Fairytales. London: Granta Books.Google Scholar
  25. Mendlesohn, F., & James, E. (2009). A Short History of Fantasy. London: Middlesex University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Milne, A. A. (2016/1926). Winnie-the-Pooh: The Complete Collection of Stories and Poems. Ill. E. H. Shepard.Google Scholar
  27. Mygind, S. (2016). Barnelitteratur i utbrud. Passage, 75, pp. 7–20.Google Scholar
  28. Nealon, J. T. (2016). Plant Theory: Biopower and Vegetable Life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Nyhus, S. (2010). Sånt som er. Oslo: Gyldendal.Google Scholar
  30. Pollan, M. (2013). The Intelligent Plant. The New Yorker. 23 & 30 December. Available at: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2013/12/23/the-intelligent-plant.
  31. Quinn, F., J. Castéra, & P. Clément. (2015). Teachers’ Conceptions of the Environment: Anthropocentrism, Non-anthropocentrism, Anthropomorphism and the Place of Nature. Environmental Education Research, 22, pp. 893–917.Google Scholar
  32. Ryan, J. C. (2016). Tolkien’s Sonic Trees and Perfumed Herbs. Plant Intelligence in Middle-Earth. In: P. Vieira, M. Gagliano, & J. Ryan eds., The Green Thread. Dialogues with the Vegetal World. London, NY: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  33. Sturluson, S. (2005). The Prose Edda. Translated by J. L. Byock. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
  34. Tolkien, J. R. R. (2005). The Lord of the Rings: 50th Anniversary Edition. London: HarperCollins Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Trites, R. S. (2014). Literary Conceptualizations of Growth: Metaphors and Cognition in Adolescent Literature. Amsterdam: John Benjamin’s Publishing Company.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Western Norway University of Applied SciencesSvelvikNorway

Personalised recommendations