Advertisement

Aesthetic Appreciation in Nature and Literature

Chapter
Part of the Critical Approaches to Children's Literature book series (CRACL)

Abstract

The author’s major aim in this chapter is to argue that aesthetic experiences of nature are crucial for the formation of ecocitizens. By means of philosophical analysis he attends to some differences between experiences in nature as opposed to experience of nature as mediated by literature, and shows how they both contribute to the formation of children into responsible ecocitizens. He argues that aesthetic experience of nature must be cognitive since knowledge of nature must play a role for how we experience nature, and emphasizes the multisensory aspect of nature experiences. Experiences in nature are then compared to experiences in literature and Karlsen argues for the importance of knowledge in both instances.

Works Cited

  1. Bayne, T. (2010). The Unity of Perception. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Burke, Edmund. (2001). On the Sublime and Beautiful, Vol. XXIV, Part 2. The Harvard Classics. New York: P. F. Collier & Son, 1909–14; Bartleby.com. www.bartleby.com/24/2/ [Accessed 11 September 2017].
  3. Carlson, A. (2000). Aesthetics and the Environment—The Appreciation of Nature, Art and Architecture. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Carlson, A. (2011). Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature and Environmentalism. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 69, pp. 137–155.Google Scholar
  5. Carroll, N. (2004). On Being Moved by Nature. In: A. Carlson & A. Berleant eds., The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Broadview Press, pp. 89–107.Google Scholar
  6. Eaton, M. M. (2004). Fact and Fiction in the Appreciation of Nature. In: A. Carlson & A. Berleant eds., The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Broadview Press, pp. 170–181.Google Scholar
  7. Hepburn, R. (1966). Contemporary Aesthetics and the Neglect of Natural Beauty. In: A. Carlson & A. Berleant eds., The Aesthetics of Natural Environments. Broadview Press, pp. 43–62.Google Scholar
  8. Jordet, A. N. (1998). Nærmiljøet som klasserom. Uteskole i teori og praksis. Oslo: Cappelens Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
  9. Kant, I. (1987). Critique of Judgment. Translated by Werner Pluhar. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
  10. Louv, R. (2005). Last Child in the Woods. London: Atlantic Books.Google Scholar
  11. McCarthy, C. (2006). The Road. New York: Vintage International.Google Scholar
  12. Nikolajeva, M. (2014). Reading for Learning. Cognitive Approaches to Children’s Literature. Amsterdam: Benjamins.Google Scholar
  13. Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Parsons, G. (2002). Nature Appreciation, Science, and Positive Aesthetics. British Journal of Aesthetics, 42(3), pp. 279–295.Google Scholar
  15. Parsons, G. (2008). Aesthetics and Nature. Continuum Press.Google Scholar
  16. Rickinson, M., J. Dillion, K. Teamey, M. Morris, M. E. Choi, D. Sanders, & P. Benefield. (2004). A Review on Research on Outdoor Learning. Preston Montford, Shropshire: Field Studies Council.Google Scholar
  17. Rolston, H. (2002). From Beauty to Duty: Aesthetic of Nature and Environmental Ethics. In: A. Berleant ed., Environment and the Arts: Perspectives on Environmental Aesthetics. Aldershot, Hampshire, UK and Burlington, VT, pp. 127–141.Google Scholar
  18. Salten, F. (1928). Bambi, A Life in the Woods. Translated by Whittaker Chambers. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  19. Sohlberg, H. (1914). Vinternatt i Rondane (Winternight in the Mountains) [Oil on Canvas]. Oslo: The National Gallery. https://digitaltmuseum.no/011042437499/vinternatt-i-rondane-maleri.
  20. Walton, D. (1978). Fearing Fictions. Journal of Philosophy, 75(1), pp. 5–27.Google Scholar
  21. Werler, T. (2015). Læring i og av naturen? Epigenetiske aspekter ved et didaktisk problem. In: B. O. Hallås & G. Karlsen eds., Natur og danning – Profesjonsutøvelse, barnehage og skole. Bergen: Fagbokforlaget, pp. 37–58.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhilosophyUniversity of BergenBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations