Advertisement

Phenotyping the Combined Effect of Heat and Water Stress on Quinoa

Chapter
Part of the Environment & Policy book series (ENPO, volume 58)

Abstract

Quinoa is a pseudo-cereal crop that originates from Latin America and has been shown to be resistant to various abiotic stresses including water, salinity, frost, and heat stress. Quinoa was subjected, in the beginning of twenty-first century, to a large number of researches in all parts of the world including GCC (Gulf Cooperation Council) region which was characterized by a harsh climatic condition, excessive heat, and water scarcity. This experiment was conducted in the International Center for Biosaline Agriculture, UAE, in order to phenotype the responses of quinoa to heat and water stress. The experiment consisted of a germination test and pot trial. The germination test was performed for five quinoa lines under five temperatures (2, 10, 22, 30, 42 °C). Obtained results indicate that germination velocity increased with increased temperature up to 30 °C then decreased under heat stress (42 °C). Germination rate followed the same trend with nonsignificant difference between temperatures below 30; however, under 42 °C, germination rate has been reduced by 13% compared to 22 °C.

The pot experiment was conducted during the period of May to August 2016 aimed to phenotype 5 quinoa lines under four different environments: greenhouse cooled at 24 °C, greenhouse cooled at 29 °C, greenhouse cooled at 35 °C, and open-air conditions (T max exceeds 42 °C). Quinoa was also subjected to water stress (50% of full irrigation) during vegetative growth stage. Several morphological and physiological traits have been monitored including plant height, stem diameter, number of primary branches, leaf architecture, number of primary panicle, panicle weight, shoot weight, seed yield, seed size, days to flowering, days to maturity, stomatal conductance, and leaf temperature. It has been shown that heat and water stress affected all phenotypic and physiological traits, but a more pronounced effect was observed under heat stress compared to water stress. Heat and water stress affected negatively and delayed the flowering and maturity. Q5 and NSL 106399 lines flowered and matured early compared to other lines. Flowering has been inhibited under greenhouse cooled at 35 °C and open-field conditions due to excessive heat causing pollen sterility. The highest growth and productivity performances of quinoa lines were obtained under greenhouse cooled at 24 °C. Q5 and NSL 106399 lines were shown to be the most productive and resistant to heat stress. Stomatal conductance as physiological parameter was affected negatively by both heat and water stress. There was a reduction of more than 90% in average under open-field conditions compared to greenhouse cooled at 24 °C.

The finding indicates that heat stress is a limiting factor for quinoa adaptation under GCC conditions. It is recommended to grow quinoa during the mild season (October to April). Temperature exceeding 30 °C during flowering and grain filling stages was shown to be, agronomically and economically, the threshold of quinoa production where beyond this threshold seed yield is greatly affected.

Keywords

GCC region Irrigation Yield Sowing Stomatal conductance Plant architecture 

References

  1. Abugoch James LE (2009) Chapter 1 Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): composition, chemistry, nutritional, and functional properties. In: Steve LT (ed) Advances in food and nutrition research, vol 58. Academic, Amsterdam, pp 1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1043-4526(09)58001-1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barnabás B, Jäger K, Fehér A (2008) The effect of drought and heat stress on reproductive processes in cereals. Plant Cell Environ 31(1):11–38.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01727.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bazile D, Jacobsen SE, Verniau A (2016) The global expansion of quinoa: trends and limits. Front Plant Sci 7:622.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00622CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bertero HD (2001) Effects of photoperiod, temperature and radiation on the rate of leaf appearance in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under field conditions. Ann Bot 87(4):495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bois JF, Winkel T, Lhomme JP, Raffaillac JP, Rocheteau A (2006) Response of some Andean cultivars of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to temperature: effects on germination, phenology, growth and freezing. Eur J Agron 25(4):299–308.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.06.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonifacio A (2005) Frost and hail tolerance in quinoa crop and traditional knowledge to handle those adverse factors. In: Jarvis D, Mar I, Sears L (eds) Enhancing the use of crop genetic diversity to manage abiotic stress in agricultural production systems, Budapest, Hungary, 2005. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp 68–71Google Scholar
  7. Chaves MM, Pereira JS, Maroco J, Rodrigues ML, Ricardo CPP, Osório ML, Carvalho I, Faria T, Pinheiro C (2002) How plants cope with water stress in the field? Photosynthesis and growth. Ann Bot 89(7):907–916CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Choukr-allah R, Nanduri KR, Hirich A, Shahid M, Alshankiti A, Toderich K, Gill S, Butt KUR (2016) Quinoa for marginal environments: towards future food and nutritional security in MENA and Central Asia regions. Front Plant Sci 7(346):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. de Munter JS, Hu FB, Spiegelman D, Franz M, van Dam RM (2007) Whole grain, bran, and germ intake and risk of type 2 diabetes: a prospective cohort study and systematic review. PLoS Med 4(8):e261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Eisa S, Hussin S, Geissler N, Koyro HW (2012) Effect of NaCl salinity on water relations, photosynthesis and chemical composition of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as a potential cash crop halophyte. Aust J Crop Sci 6(2):357–368Google Scholar
  11. Farooq M, Bramley H, Palta JA, Siddique KH (2011) Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases. Crit Rev Plant Sci 30(6):491–507CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fghire R, Wahbi S, Anaya F, Issa Ali O, Benlhabib O, Ragab R (2015) Response of quinoa to different water management strategies: field experiments and Saltmed model application results. Irrig Drain 64(1):29–40.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1895CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Filali K, Hirich A, Ouafae B, Redouane C-A, Ragab R (2017) Yield and dry matter simulation using the Saltmed model for five quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa) accessions under deficit irrigation in South Morocco. Irrig Drain 66:340.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Geerts S, Raes D, Garcia M, Taboada C, Miranda R, Cusicanqui J, Mhizha T, Vacher J (2009) Modeling the potential for closing quinoa yield gaps under varying water availability in the Bolivian Altiplano. Agric Water Manag 96(11):1652–1658.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2009.06.020CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Geerts S, Raes D, Garcia M, Vacher J, Mamani R, Mendoza J, Huanca R, Morales B, Miranda R, Cusicanqui J, Taboada C (2008) Introducing deficit irrigation to stabilize yields of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Eur J Agron 28(3):427–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gibson L, Paulsen G (1999) Yield components of wheat grown under high temperature stress during reproductive growth. Crop Sci 39(6):1841–1846CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Giovannini C, Lucchesi S, Giachetti M (1990) Effects of heating on some chemical parameters related to soil fertility and plant growth. Soil Sci 149(6):344–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hasanuzzaman M, Nahar K, Alam MM, Roychowdhury R, Fujita M (2013) Physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms of heat stress tolerance in plants. Int J Mol Sci 14(5):9643–9684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Hatfield JL, Prueger JH (2015) Temperature extremes: effect on plant growth and development. Weather Clim Extrem 10(part a):4–10.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wace.2015.08.001CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hinojosa L, Kumar N, Gill K, Murphy K (2016) High-throughput phenotyping to evaluate heat stress response in quinoa. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Society of Agronomy, Crop Science Society of America and Soil Science Society of America, At Phoenix - Arizona,Google Scholar
  21. Hirich A (2013) Using deficit irrigation with treated wastewater to improve crop water productivity of sweet corn, chickpea, faba bean and quinoa. Revue Marocaine des Sciences Agronomiques et Vétérinaires 2(1):15–22Google Scholar
  22. Hirich A, Choukr-Allah R, Jacobsen S-E (2013) The combined effect of deficit irrigation by treated wastewater and organic amendment on quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) productivity. Desalin Water Treat 52(10–12):2208–2213.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.777944CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hirich A, Choukr-Allah R, Jacobsen S-E, El Yousfi L, El Omari H (2012) Using deficit irrigation with treated wastewater in the production of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Morocco. Revista Científica UDO Agrícola 12(3):570–583Google Scholar
  24. Hirich A, Choukr-Allah R, Jacobsen SE (2014a) Quinoa in Morocco – effect of sowing dates on development and yield. J Agron Crop Sci 200(5):371–377.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12071CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hirich A, Choukr-Allah R, Jelloul A, Jacobsen S-E (2014b) Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) seedling, water uptake and yield responses to irrigation water salinity. Acta Hortic 1054:145–152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hirich A, Fatnassi H, Ragab R, Choukr-Allah R (2016) Prediction of climate change impact on corn grown in the south of Morocco using the Saltmed model. Irrig Drain 65(1):9–18.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hirich A, Jelloul A, Choukr-Allah R, Jacobsen SE (2014c) Saline water irrigation of quinoa and chickpea: seedling rate, stomatal conductance and yield responses. J Agron Crop Sci 200:378–389.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12072CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  29. Jacobsen S-E, Liu F, Jensen CR (2009) Does root-sourced ABA play a role for regulation of stomata under drought in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Sci Hortic 122(2):281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jacobsen S-E, Quispe H, Mujica A (2000) Quinoa: an alternative crop for saline soils in the Andes. CIP Program ReportGoogle Scholar
  31. Jacobsen S, Bach A (1998) The influence of temperature on seed germination rate in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Seed Sci Technol (Switzerland) 26 (2):515–523Google Scholar
  32. Jacobsen SE, Monteros C, Christiansen JL, Bravo LA, Corcuera LJ, Mujica A (2005) Plant responses of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to frost at various phenological stages. Eur J Agron 22(2):131–139.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2004.01.003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jacobsen SE, Monteros C, Corcuera LJ, Bravo LA, Christiansen JL, Mujica A (2007) Frost resistance mechanisms in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Eur J Agron 26(4):471–475.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2007.01.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jiang Y, Huang B (2000) Effects of drought or heat stress alone and in combination on Kentucky bluegrass. Crop Sci 40(5):1358–1362CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kader M (2005) A comparison of seed germination calculation formulae and the associated interpretation of resulting data. J Proc R Soc N S Wales 138:65–75Google Scholar
  36. Kader M, Jutzi S (2004) Effects of thermal and salt treatments during imbibition on germination and seedling growth of sorghum at 42/19 C. J Agron Crop Sci 190(1):35–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kim H-J (2016) Opportunities and challenges of alternative specialty crops: the global picture. Hort Sci 51(11):1316–1319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Koyro H-W, Eisa S (2008) Effect of salinity on composition, viability and germination of seeds of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Plant Soil 302(1):79–90.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-007-9457-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Koyro H-W, Lieth H, Eisa SS (2008) Salt tolerance of Chenopodium quinoa Willd., grains of the Andes: influence of salinity on biomass production, yield, composition of reserves in the seeds, water and solute relations mangroves and halophytes: restoration and utilisation. In: Lieth H, Sucre MG, Herzog B (eds) Tasks for vegetation science 34, vol 43. Springer, Netherlands, pp 133–145.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6720-4_13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lesjak J, Calderini DF (2017) Increased night temperature negatively affects grain yield, biomass and grain number in Chilean quinoa. Front Plant Sci 352:8Google Scholar
  41. Morrison MJ, Stewart DW (2002) Heat stress during flowering in summer Brassica. Crop Sci 42(3):797–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nsimba RY, Kikuzaki H, Konishi Y (2008) Antioxidant activity of various extracts and fractions of Chenopodium quinoa and Amaranthus spp. seeds. Food Chem 106(2):760–766CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Panuccio MR, Jacobsen SE, Akhtar SS, Muscolo A (2014) Effect of saline water on seed germination and early seedling growth of the halophyte quinoa. AoB Plants 6:plu047.  https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plu047CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Prasad P, Staggenborg S, Ristic Z (2008) Impacts of drought and/or heat stress on physiological, developmental, growth, and yield processes of crop plants. In: Ahuja LR (ed) Response of crops to limited water: Understanding and modeling water stress effects on plant growth processes, Advances in Agricultural Systems Modeling Series 1, vol Response of Crops. ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 301–355Google Scholar
  45. Radin JW (1984) Stomatal responses to water stress and to abscisic acid in phosphorus-deficient cotton plants. Plant Physiol 76(2):392–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Razzaghi F, Ahmadi SH, Jacobsen SE, Jensen CR, Andersen MN (2012) Effects of salinity and soil–drying on radiation use efficiency, water productivity and yield of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). J Agron Crop Sci 198(3):173–184.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2011.00496.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Seif-Ennasr M, Zaaboul R, Hirich A, Caroletti GN, Bouchaou L, El Morjani ZEA, Beraaouz EH, McDonnell RA, Choukr-Allah R (2016) Climate change and adaptive water management measures in Chtouka Aït Baha region (Morocco). Sci Total Environ 573:862–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shabala S, Hariadi Y, Jacobsen SE (2013) Genotypic difference in salinity tolerance in quinoa is determined by differential control of xylem Na (+) loading and stomatal density. J Plant Physiol 170(10):906–914.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2013.01.014CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Silva EN, Ferreira-Silva SL, de Vasconcelos FA, Ribeiro RV, Viégas RA, Silveira JAG (2010) Photosynthetic changes and protective mechanisms against oxidative damage subjected to isolated and combined drought and heat stresses in Jatropha curcas plants. J Plant Physiol 167(14):1157–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Wang G, Li F, Zhang J, Zhao M, Hui Z, Wang W (2010) Overaccumulation of glycine betaine enhances tolerance of the photosynthetic apparatus to drought and heat stress in wheat. Photosynthetica 48(1):30–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wheeler T, Von Braun J (2013) Climate change impacts on global food security. Science 341(6145):508–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Winkel T, Lhomme JP, Laura JPN, Alcón CM, del Castillo C, Rocheteau A (2009) Assessing the protective effect of vertically heterogeneous canopies against radiative frost: the case of quinoa on the Andean Altiplano. Agric For Meteorol 149(10):1759–1768.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agrformet.2009.06.005CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Wise R, Olson A, Schrader S, Sharkey T (2004) Electron transport is the functional limitation of photosynthesis in field-grown pima cotton plants at high temperature. Plant Cell Environ 27(6):717–724CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Yang A, Akhtar S, Amjad M, Iqbal S, Jacobsen SE (2016) Growth and physiological responses of quinoa to drought and temperature stress. J Agron Crop Sci 202:445CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yazar A, Incekaya Ç, Sezen SM, Jacobsen S-E (2015) Saline water irrigation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Pasture Sci 66(10):993–1002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zevallos V, Herencia L, Ciclitira P (2015) Quinoa, coeliac disease and gluten-free diet. In: Bazile D, Bertero H, Nieto C (eds) State of the art report on quinoa around the world in 2013. FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mohammed VI Polytechnic UniversityAfrican Sustainable Agriculture Research InstituteLaayouneMorocco
  2. 2.International Center for Biosaline AgricultureDubaiUAE

Personalised recommendations