Advertisement

Imprints of Neo-tectonism in the Evolutionary Record Along the Course of Khari River in Damodar Fan Delta of Lower Ganga Basin

  • Suman Deb Barman
  • Aznarul IslamEmail author
  • Balai Chandra Das
  • Sunipa Mandal
  • Subodh Chandra Pal
Chapter
Part of the Geography of the Physical Environment book series (GEOPHY)

Abstract

Neo-tectonism affected the evolution of landscape across the earth since post-Miocene. The Khari river in Lower Damodar fan delta in West Bengal similarly portrayed the imprints of neo-tectonism in the forms of rapidly changing meander geometry, deformation in long profiles, unpaired terraces, soft sediment structures (fluid escape structure and convolute), etc. The study of meander geometry considering 142 loops (upper—92, middle—38 and lower—12) for the years 1972 (Survey of India topo-sheet) and 2017 (Google Earth images) portrayed rapidity in channel evolution in the middle and the lower stretches of the river compared to its upper counterpart as shown by the changing sinuosity index during 1972 and 2017 (upper: 0.1, middle: −0.4 and lower: −0.42), radius–wavelength ratio (upper: 0.01, middle: −0.06 and lower: −0.04), meander shape index  (upper: −0.05, middle: −0.09 and lower: −0.01), and meander form index (upper: −0.02, middle: −0.17 and lower: −0.13). We found this kind of meander behaviour to be correlated with the negative Bouguer anomaly (−45 to −30 m Gal) in the middle reach. Similarly, based on SRTM DEM (30 m), we detected a break in the long profile at the middle reach underlain by a sub-surface fault. In addition, we observed unpaired terraces in the middle reach. Besides, our extensive field survey guided us to identify long continued fluid escape structure and convolute along the banks of the river and a typical sedimentary facies which proved to be tectonically controlled.

Keywords

Neo-tectonism Paleogeography Meander geometry Stream-length index Unpaired terrace Facies analysis Soft sediment structure 

References

  1. Agarwal K, Singh I, Sharma M, Sharma S, Rajagopalan G (2002) Extensional tectonic activity in the cratonward parts (peripheral bulge) of the Ganga Plain Foreland Basin, India. Int J Earth Sci 91(5):897–905CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. AGI (2009) Glossary of geology. American Geological institute, Washington, D.C., online version. www.agiweb.org. Accessed Nov 2009
  3. Akter J, Sarker MH, Popescu L, Roelvink D (2016) Evolution of the Bengal Delta and its prevailing processes. J Coast Res 321:1212–1226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashley GH (1931) Our youthful scenery. Geol Soc Am Bull 42:537–546CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bil M (2002) The identification of neotectonics based on changes of valley floor width. Landform Anal 3:77–85Google Scholar
  6. Brice JC (1964) Channel patterns and terraces of the Loup rivers in Nebraska, U.S. Geological Survey, Prof. Paper 422D. In: Morisawa M (1968) Streams: their dynamics and morphology. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, p 138Google Scholar
  7. Brice JC (1984) Planform properties of meandering river. In: Elliott CM (ed) Proceedings of the conference of river meandering’83. American Society of Civil Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana, pp 393–399Google Scholar
  8. Brookfield ME (1998) The evolution of the great river systems of southern Asia during the Cenozoic India-Asia collision: rivers draining southwards. Geomorphology 22:285–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burbank DW, Anderson RS (2001) Tectonic geomorphology. Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, p 270Google Scholar
  10. Cotton CA (1952) Geomorphology an introduction to the study of landforms. Wiley, New York, p 100Google Scholar
  11. Cremon ÉH, Rossetti DD, Sawakuchi AD, Cohen MC (2016) The role of tectonics and climate in the late quaternary evolution of a Northern Amazonian River. Geomorphology 271(15), 22–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cunha PP et al (2005) Tectonic control of the Tejo river fluvial incision during the late Cenozoic, in Ródão—central Portugal (Atlantic Iberian border). Geomorphology 64:271–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Das BC (2014) Two indices to measure the intensity of meander. In: Singh RB, Hassan MI (eds) Advances in geographical and environmental sciences, pp 233–246Google Scholar
  14. Dar RA, Chandra R, Romshoo SA (2013) Morphotectonic and lithostratigraphic analysis of intermontane Karewa Basin of Kashmir Himalayas, India. J Mt Sci 10(1):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dey S (2014) Fluvial processes: meandering and braiding. In: Fluvial hydrodynamics. GeoPlanet: earth and planetary sciences. Springer, Berlin, HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  16. Ghosh S, Islam A (2016) Quaternary alluvial stratigraphy and palaeoclimatic reconstruction in the Damodar River Basin of West Bengal. In: Das B, Ghosh S, Islam A, Ismail M (eds) Neo-Thinking on Ganges-Brahmaputra Basin Geomorphology. Springer Geography. Springer, ChamGoogle Scholar
  17. Goodbred SL Jr (2003) Response of the Ganges dispersal system to climate change: a source-to-sink view since the last interstade. Sed Geol 162(1–2):83–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodbred JS, Kuhel SA (2000a) Enormous Ganges-Brahmaputra sediment load during strengthened early Holocene monsoon. Geology 28(12):1083–1086CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goodbred SL Jr, Kuhel SA (2000b) The significance of large sediment supply, active tectonism, eustasy on the margin sequence development: late quaternary stratigraphy and evolution of the Ganges-Brahmaputra Delta. Sed Geol 133(3–4):227–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goswami C (2011) Tectonic control on the drainage system in a piedmont region in tectonically active eastern Himalayas. Front Earth Sci.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-012-0297-z
  21. Hack JT (1973a) Drainage adjustments in the Appalachians. In: Marisawa M (ed) Fluvial geomorphology. State University of New York, Binghamton, NY, pp 51–69Google Scholar
  22. Hack JT (1973b) Stream profile analysis and stream-gradient index. J Res US Geol Sur 1(4):421–429Google Scholar
  23. Islam A, Guchhait SK (2017) Analysing the influence of Farakka Barrage Project on channel dynamics and meander geometry of Bhagirathi river of West Bengal, India. Arab J Geosci 10(11)Google Scholar
  24. Kober F, Zeilinger G, Ivy-Ochs S, Dolati A, Smit J, Kubik PW (2013) Climatic and tectonic control on fluvial and alluvial fan sequence formation in the Central Makran Range, SE-Iran. Global Planet Change 111:133–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lahiri S (1996) Channel pattern as signature of neotectonic movements—A Case study from Brahmaputra Valley in Assam. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 24(4):265–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Latrubesse EM, Franzinelli E (2002) The Holocene alluvial plain of the middle Amazon River, Brazil. Geomorphology 44(3–4):241–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Leopold LB, Langbein WB (1966) River meanders. Sci Am 214(6):60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leopold LB, Wolman MG (1957) River channel patterns-braided, meandering and straight. U.S. Geological Survey, Prof. Paper 282B. In: Morisawa M (1968) Streams: their dynamics and morphology. McGraw Hill, New York, p 138Google Scholar
  29. Leopold LB, Wolman MG (1960) River meanders. Bull Geol Soc Am 71:774. In: Julien PY (1985) Planform geometry of meandering alluivial channels. Civil Engineering Department, Engineering Research Center, Colorado State University, p 6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP (1964) Fluvial processes in geomorphology. W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco and London, p 281Google Scholar
  31. Leopold LB, Wolman MG, Miller JP (1992) Fluvial processes in geomorphology. Dover Publications Inc., New York, p 281Google Scholar
  32. Mats VD, Khlystov OM, Batist MD, Ceramicola S, Lomonosova TK, Klimansky A (2000) Evolution of the academician ridge accommodation zone in the central part of the baikal rift, from high-resolution reflection seismic profiling and geological field investigations. Int J Earth Sci 89(2):229–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Miall AD (1985) Architectural element analysis: a new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits. Earth Sci Rev 22:261–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Perucca LP et al (2013). Morphotectonic and neotectonic control on river pattern in the Sierra de la Cantera piedmont, central Precordillera, province of San Juan, Argentina. Geomorphology.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.09.014
  35. Radoane M et al (2003) Geomorphological evolution of longitudinal river profiles in the Carpathians. Geomorphology 50:293–306CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosenau MR (2014) Tectonics of the Southern Andean intra-arc zone (38°–42°S). An unpublished PhD dissertation. Free University of Berlin, Department of Geosciences, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  37. Rosgen DL (1994) A classification of natural rivers. Catena 22(3):169–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Roy S, Sahu AS (2015) Quaternary tectonic control on channel morphology over sedimentary low land: a case study in the Ajay-Damodar interfluve of Eastern India 6(6):927–946Google Scholar
  39. Sarkar S, Banerjee S, Chakraborty S (1995) Synsedimentary seismic signature in Mesoproterozoic Koldaha Shale, Kheinjua formation, central India. Indian J Earth Sci 22:158–164Google Scholar
  40. Sarkar S, Chakraborty S, Banerjee S, Bose PK (2002) Facies sequence and cryptic imprint of sag tectonics in late Proterozoic Sirbu Shale, central India. In: Altermann W, Corcoran P (eds) Precambrian sedimentary environments: a modern approach to ancient depositional systems. Special publication of the International Association of Sedimentologists, No. 33. Blackwell Science, pp 369–382Google Scholar
  41. Sarkar A, Sengupta S, McArthur JM, Ravenscroft P, Bera MK, Bhusan R et al (2009) Evolution of Ganges-Brahmaputra western Delta plain: clues from sedimentology. Quatern Sci Rev 28:2564–2581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schumm SA (1963) Sinuosity of alluvial rivers of the great plains. Geol Soc Ma Bull 74:1089–1100. In: Morisawa M (1968) Streams: their dynamics and morphology. McGraw Hill Book Co., p 138Google Scholar
  43. Schumm SA (2005) River variability and complexity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 65Google Scholar
  44. Seeber L, Gornitz V (1983) River profiles along the Himalayan arc as indicators of active tectonics. Tectonophysics 92:335–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sen PK (1976) A study of the hydrological characteristics of the Banka Basin. Indian J Power Valley Develop, pp 353–358 (November, Calcutta)Google Scholar
  46. Sen PK (1978) Evaluation of the hydrogeomorphological analysis of the Bhagirathi-Hooghly and Damadar interfluve: UGC research project. Department of Geography, The University of BurdwanGoogle Scholar
  47. Seth A, Sarkar S, Bose PK (1990) Synsedimentary seismic activity in an immature passive margin basin, lower member of Katrol Formation, Upper Jurassic, Kutch, India. Sed Geol 68:279–291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Shahjahan M (1970) Factors controlling the geometry of fluvial meanders. Int Assoc Sci Hydrol B 15(3):13–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shukla UK, Bora DS, Singh CK (2009) Geomorphic positioning and depositional dynamics of river systems in lower Siwalik Basin, Kumaun Himalaya. J Geol Soc India 73:335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Silver CRP, Murphy MA, Taylor MH, Gosse J, Baltz T (2015) Neotectonics of the western Nepal fault system: implications for Himalayan strain partitioning. Tectonics 34(12):2494–2513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sinha-Roy S (2001) Neotectonically controlled catchment capture: an example from the Banas and Chambal drainage basins, Rajasthan. Curr Sci 80(2):25Google Scholar
  52. Sougnez N, Vanacker V (2011) The topographic signature of quaternary tectonic uplift in the Ardennes Massif (Western Europe). Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 15:1095–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Štěpančíková P et al (2008) Neotectonic development of drainage networks in the East Sudeten Mountains and monitoring of recent fault displacements (Czech Republic). Geomorphology 102:68–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stolum HH (2013) In: Richeson D (ed) The geometry of meandering rivers. Internet: www.divisbyzero.com-1490x718
  55. Timar G (2003) Controls on channel sinuosity changes: a case study of the Tisza River, the Great Hungarian Plain. Quatern Sci Rev 22:2199–2207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Zámolyi et al (2010) Neotectonic control on river sinuosity at the western margin of the Little Hungarian Plain. Geomorphology 122:231–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Suman Deb Barman
    • 1
  • Aznarul Islam
    • 2
    Email author
  • Balai Chandra Das
    • 3
  • Sunipa Mandal
    • 4
  • Subodh Chandra Pal
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeographyThe University of BurdwanBardhamanIndia
  2. 2.Department of GeographyAliah UniversityKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Department of GeographyKrishnagar Government CollegeNadiaIndia
  4. 4.Department of Geological SciencesJadavpur UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations