18F-FDG PET/CT in Infected Vascular Grafts

  • Ashik AmlaniEmail author
  • Thomas WagnerEmail author
Part of the Clinicians’ Guides to Radionuclide Hybrid Imaging book series (CGRHI)


Vascular graft insertion to treat aortic or peripheral aneurysm and lower limb occlusive disease is now commonplace [1]. A variety of synthetic materials, autologous veins, or a combination of the two can be used as the graft material depending on the anatomical location and clinical circumstance [2]. Although graft-related complications are uncommon, one of the most feared is graft infection and this remains a major surgical challenge [3]. This chapter will discuss the use of FDG PET/CT in the diagnosis of vascular graft infection.


  1. 1.
    Swain TW, Calligaro KD, Dougherty MD. Management of infected aortic prosthetic grafts. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2004;38(1):75–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Twine CP, McLain AD. Graft type for femoro-popliteal bypass surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(5):CD001487.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harris JP. Complications of vascular surgery: infected vascular grafts, aortoenteric fistula, and pseudoaneurysms. General surgery. Springer; 2009. p. 1895–902.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leroy O, Meybeck A, Sarraz-Bournet B, d’Elia P, Legout L. Vascular graft infections. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2012;25(2):154–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Perera GB, Fujitani RM, Kubaska SM. Aortic graft infection: update on management and treatment options. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006;40(1):1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Spacek M, Belohlavek O, Votrubova J, Sebesta P, Stadler P. Diagnostics of “non-acute” vascular prosthesis infection using 18F-FDG PET/CT: our experience with 96 prostheses. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(5):850–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Legout L, Sarraz-Bournet B, D’Elia PV, Devos P, Pasquet A, Caillaux M, et al. Characteristics and prognosis in patients with prosthetic vascular graft infection: a prospective observational cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(4):352–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    FitzGerald SF, Kelly C, Humphreys H. Diagnosis and treatment of prosthetic aortic graft infections: confusion and inconsistency in the absence of evidence or consensus. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005;56(6):996–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Orton DF, LeVeen RF, Saigh JA, Culp WC, Fidler JL, Lynch TJ, et al. Aortic prosthetic graft infections: radiologic manifestations and implications for management. Radiographics. 2000;20(4):977–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Low RN, Wall SD, Jeffrey RB, Sollitto RA, Reilly LM, Tierney LM. Aortoenteric fistula and perigraft infection: evaluation with CT. Radiology. 1990;175(1):157–62.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Jamar F, Buscombe J, Chiti A, Christian PE, Delbeke D, Donohoe KJ, et al. EANM/SNMMI guideline for 18F-FDG use in inflammation and infection. J Nucl Med. 2013;54(4):647–58.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fukuchi K, Ishida Y, Higashi M, Tsunekawa T, Ogino H, Minatoya K, et al. Detection of aortic graft infection by fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography: comparison with computed tomographic findings. J Vasc Surg. 2005;42(5):919–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Keidar Z, Engel A, Hoffman A, Israel O, Nitecki S. Prosthetic vascular graft infection: the role of 18F-FDG PET/CT. J Nucl Med. 2007;48(8):1230–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Chung CJ, Wilson AA, Melton JW, Hartley WS, Allen DM. Uptake of In-111 labeled leukocytes by lymphocele. A cause of false-positive vascular graft infection. Clin Nucl Med. 1992;17(5):368–70.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samuel A, Paganelli G, Chiesa R, Sudati F, Calvitto M, Melissano G, et al. Detection of prosthetic vascular graft infection using avidin/indium-111-biotin scintigraphy. J Nucl Med. 1996;37(1):55–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sah BR, Husmann L, Mayer D, Scherrer A, Rancic Z, Puippe G, et al. Diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG-PET/CT in vascular graft infections. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;49(4):455–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Krupnick AS, Lombardi JV, Engels FH, Kreisel D, Zhuang H, Alavi A, et al. 18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a novel imaging tool for the diagnosis of aortoenteric fistula and aortic graft infection—a case report. Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2003;37(5):363–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shim H, Sung K, Kim WS, Lee YT, Park PW, Jeong DS. Diagnosis of graft infection using FDG PET-CT. Korean J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;45(3):189–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dutasta F, Richaud C, Michon A, Ragone E, Podglajen I, Mainardi JL. Use of 18F-FDG PET/CT for diagnosis of vascular graft infection with spread to sternum caused by Coxiella burnetii. Infect Dis (Lond). 2016;48(10):769–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lauwers P, Van den Broeck S, Carp L, Hendriks J, Van Schil P, Blockx P. The use of positron emission tomography with (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose for the diagnosis of vascular graft infection. Angiology. 2007;58(6):717–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tokuda Y, Oshima H, Araki Y, Narita Y, Mutsuga M, Kato K, et al. Detection of thoracic aortic prosthetic graft infection with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013;43(6):1183–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cook GJR, Fogelman I, Maisey MN. Normal physiological and benign pathological variants of 18-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scanning: potential for error in interpretation. Semin Nucl Med. 1996;26(4):308–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Keidar Z, Pirmisashvili N, Leiderman M, Nitecki S, Israel O. 18F-FDG uptake in noninfected prosthetic vascular grafts: incidence, patterns, and changes over time. J Nucl Med. 2014;55(3):392–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bruggink JL, Glaudemans AW, Saleem BR, Meerwaldt R, Alkefaji H, Prins TR, et al. Accuracy of FDG-PET-CT in the diagnostic work-up of vascular prosthetic graft infection. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2010;40(3):348–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of RadiologyGuy’s and St. Thomas’ NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Nuclear MedicineRoyal Free London NHS Foundation TrustLondonUK

Personalised recommendations