Advertisement

Ecosystem Services from Tonle Sap Flood Pulse: Spatial and Economic Analysis in Aek Phnom and Sangkae Districts of Battambang Province, Cambodia

  • Kimchhin SokEmail author
  • Philippe Méral
  • Didier Pillot
  • Stéphanie Defossez
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 64)

Abstract

Livelihoods of people in the Tonle Sap Lake (TSL) area of Cambodia are complex combinations of rice-based cropping, fishery systems, mixed cash crops/home gardens, natural pond culture/aquaculture, cattle and livestock, collection of flooded forest products, and nonfarm and off-farm activities. The productivity of these activities is intimately linked to a number of ecosystem services and natural resources derived from the TSL. However, in recent decades the fish stock and the flooded forest have been degraded. This situation is made even worse as the TSL faces dramatic hydrological changes in the flood pulse regime and water levels. These changes have seriously impacted local livelihoods. In this situation, the environment becomes a significant source of vulnerability. This chapter provides an overview of this situation through economic and mapping analysis of two districts of Battambang Province. The implementation uses agrarian system diagnosis based on geographic information system mapping and qualitative interviews with informants during 2 years with low and normal flood pulses to identify types of household activities and their economic performance, changes in farming systems, agro-ecological zones, levels of poverty and resilience, and the country’s related gain and loss in gross domestic production. We discuss the usefulness of such analyses in the field of ecosystem services mapping, which may contribute solutions to the Royal Government of Cambodia and to development partners to recognise this impact of climate and flood changes on rice production, natural resources, household livelihoods, and the country’s economy as a whole.

Keywords

Livelihoods Agrarian system analysis GIS mapping Household strategy Resilience 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are very much indebted to the villagers and relevant sectoral department governors/authorities for their warm hospitality and great cooperation during the field research. Intellectual and institutional support is acknowledged from the Ecosystem Service and Land Use Research Center of the Royal University of Agriculture in Phnom Penh, Cambodia, and the MOISA laboratory of École Doctorale Économie et Gestion in Montpellier, France. Data collection, analysis, and writing were funded by the UMR-GRED research unit of the French Research Institute for Sustainable Development (IRD)-2015 and Institut Agronomique, Vétérinaire et Forestier de France—Agreenium-2016, respectively.

References

  1. Ahmed, et al. (1998). Socio-economic assessment of freshwater capture fisheries of Cambodia; report on a household survey, 1998. Phnom Penh: Mekong River Commission.Google Scholar
  2. Barral, S., Touzard, I., Ferraton, N., Rasse-Mercat, E., & Pillot, D. (2012). ‘Assessing smallholder farming. Diagnostic analysis of family-based agricultural systems in a small region’, Illustrated with the Case Study of the Giham Pioneer Front, Sumatra, Indonesia. Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture, Philippines.Google Scholar
  3. Bonheur, et al. (2002). Natural resources management for human security in Cambodia’s Tonle Sap biosphere reserve. Environmental Science and Policy, 5(1), 33–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cochet, H. (2012). The systeme agraire concept in francophone peasant studies. Geoforum, 43(1), 128–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cochet, H. (2015). Comparative agriculture. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gibson, E., Fedorenko, E., & Rohde, D. (2006). The nature of working memory capacity in sentence comprehension: Evidence against domain-specific working memory resources. Journal of Memory and Language, 54(4), 541–553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Glenn, D. I. (2009, November). Determining sample size 1. Fact sheet (pp 1–5).Google Scholar
  8. Hap et al. (2016). A review of socioeconomic studies in the fisheries sector in Cambodia (p 14).Google Scholar
  9. Keskinen, M. (2006). The Lake with Floating Villages: A socio-economic analysis of the villages around the Tonle Sap Lake. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22(3), 463–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Keskinen, M., & Varis, O. (2012). Institutional cooperation at a basin level: For what, by whom? Lessons learned from Cambodia’s Tonle Sap Lake. Natural Resources Forum, 36(1), 50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Keskinen, M. et al. (2011, December). Exploring Tonle Sap Futures study: Baseline results from hydrological and livelihood analyses.Google Scholar
  12. Kimsun, T., & Bopharath, S. (2011). Poverty and environment links: The case of rural Cambodia. CDRI Pub.Google Scholar
  13. Kummu, M., et al. (2008). Sediment: curse or blessing for Tonle Sap Lake? Ambio, 37(3), 158–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lamberts, D. (2006). The Tonle Sap Lake as a productive ecosystem. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22(3), 481–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MAFF. (2014). Annual report of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries 2013–2014 and Direction 2014–2015. Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fishery, Phnom Penh.Google Scholar
  16. MAFF. (2016). Annual report of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries 2015–2016 and Direction 2016–2017. Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fishery, Phnom Penh.Google Scholar
  17. Marschke, M., & Berkes, F. (2011). Exploring strategies that build livelihood resiliance: A case from Cambodia. Addiction.Google Scholar
  18. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Available at: http://www.who.int/entity/globalchange/ecosystems/ecosys.pdf, http://www.loc.gov/catdir/toc/ecip0512/2005013229.html
  19. MOEF. (2016). Cambodia macroeconomic monitor mid-year assessment 2016. Ministry of Economy and Finance, Phnom Penh.Google Scholar
  20. MOP. (2013). Poverty in Cambodia – Redefining the poverty line (pp. 1–12).Google Scholar
  21. MOP. (2014). Poverty alleviation – An approach to an action plan.Google Scholar
  22. Neang, M. (2015). Maintaining ecosystem services provided by rice production systems in Cambodia: Identifying costs for farmers and consumers’ preferences. Clermont-Ferrand: University of Auvergne.Google Scholar
  23. NIS. (2008). General population census of Cambodia 2008 (pp. 1–37). Ministry of Planning.Google Scholar
  24. Nuorteva, P., Keskinen, M., & Varis, O. (2010). Water, livelihoods and climate change adaptation in the tonle sap lake area, Cambodia: Learning from the past to understand the future. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Pillot, D. (2008). Jardins et rizières du Cambodge: les enjeux du développement agricole (Gardens and Rice lands of the Cambodia – The agricultural development issues). Paris: GRET Association Ed. Karthala.Google Scholar
  26. RGC. (2001). Royal degree on the establishment and management of the Tonle Sap biosphere reserve. Available at: http://www.tsbred.org/docs/lawandregulation/RoyalDecreeoncreationandmanagemetoftsbrEng.Pdf
  27. Rigg, J. (2006). Land, farming, livelihoods, and poverty: Rethinking the links in the Rural South. World Development, 34(1), 180–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Serrat, O., Gallego-Lizon, T., & Moffatt, D. (2005). The Tonle Sap basin strategy. Asian Development Bank. Available at: http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/institutional-document/33050/files/tonle-sap-basin-strategy.pdf
  29. Sithirith, M. (2011). Political geographies of the Tonle Sap: Power, space and resources political geographies of the Tonle Sap: Power, space and resources.Google Scholar
  30. Sithirith, M. (2015). The governance of wetlands in the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia. Journal of Environmental Science and Engineering, 4(B), 331–346.Google Scholar
  31. Sothorn, K. et al. (2011). Policy coherence in agricultural and rural development: Cambodia (55).Google Scholar
  32. Tallis, H., & Polasky, S. (2009). Mapping and valuing ecosystem services as an approach for conservation and natural-resource management. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1162, 265–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Van Zalinge et al. (2000). Where there is water, there is fish? Cambodian fisheries issues in a Mekong River Basin perspective.Google Scholar
  34. Varis, O., & Keskinen, M. (2006). Policy analysis for the Tonle Sap Lake, Cambodia: A Bayesian network model approach. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 22(3), 417–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Västilä, K., et al. (2010). Modelling climate change impacts on the flood pulse in the lower mekong floodplains. Journal of Water and Climate Change, 1(1), 67–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. WCS. (2010). Conservation of threatened grassland biodiversity in the Tonle Sap basin, Cambodia. Briefing document, April 2011. Phnom Penh.Google Scholar
  37. World Bank. (2006). Cambodia, halving poverty by 2015? Poverty Assessment 2006 4(35213), 1–250.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kimchhin Sok
    • 1
    Email author
  • Philippe Méral
    • 2
  • Didier Pillot
    • 3
  • Stéphanie Defossez
    • 2
  1. 1.Ecosystem Services and Land Use Research CentreRoyal University of AgriculturePhnom PenhCambodia
  2. 2.French Research Institute for Sustainable Development, UMR GREDMontpellierFrance
  3. 3.SupAgroMontpellierFrance

Personalised recommendations