Advertisement

What, if anything, can be done about Benefit Sanctions?

  • Michael Adler
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies book series (PSLS)

Abstract

This chapter reviews three recent reports on benefit sanctions, by the House of Commons Work and Pensions Select Committee in 2015, by the National Audit Office in 2016, and by the House of Commons Public Accounts Select Committee in 2017, and outlines ten proposals for addressing the injustice associated with them and ameliorating the hardship they cause. It also considers the possibility of incorporating the European Social Charter, in much the same way that the European Convention on Human Rights has been incorporated in the Human Rights Act 1998. In the event that none of these measures are taken up, the chapter concludes by briefly considering an alternative to a social security system based on conditionality, namely a basic income scheme.

Keywords

Select Committees National Audit Office Proposals for reform European Social Charter Incorporation Basic income 

References

  1. Barnard C. (2008). The ‘Opt-Out’ for the UK and Poland from the Charter of Fundamental Rights: Triumph of Rhetoric over Reality? In S. Griller & J. Ziller (Eds.), The Lisbon Treaty. Schriftenreihe der Österreichischen Gesellschaft für Europaforschung. European Community Studies Association of Austria Publication Series (Vol. 11). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Bartley, J. (2017, 2 June). The Greens Endorse a Universal Basic Income. Others Need to Follow. The Guardian.Google Scholar
  3. Chakrabortty, A. (2017, October 31). A Basic Income for Everyone: Yes, Finland Shows It Really Can Work. The Guardian. Available at https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/31/finland-universal-basic-income.
  4. Comptroller and Auditor General. (2016). Benefit Sanctions, HC 628, Session 2016–17. London: National Audit Office. Available at https://www.nao.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Benefit-sanctions.pdf.
  5. Cowburn, A. (2017, February 5). Labour has Set Up a ‘Working Group’ to Investigate the Radical Idea of a Basic Income and will Report Back on its Conclusions before the next General Election, John McDonnell has said. The Independent.Google Scholar
  6. Hodge, M. (2016). Called to Account. London: Abacus.Google Scholar
  7. House of Commons Public Accounts Committee. (2017, February 21). Benefit Sanctions, HC 775, 42nd Report of Session 2016–2017. Available at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201617/cmselect/cmpubacc/775/775.pdf.
  8. House of Commons Work and Pensions Committee. (2015, March 24). Benefit Sanctions Policy Beyond the Oakley Review, HC 214, 5th Report of Session 2014–2015. Available at https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201415/cmselect/cmworpen/814/814.pdf.
  9. Labour Party. (2017). Election Manifesto: Social Security. Available at https://labour.org.uk/manifesto/social-security/.
  10. Molander, A. (2016). Discretion in the Welfare State. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  11. Molander, A., & Torsvik, G. (2015). Getting People into Work: What, (if Anything) Can Justify Mandatory Activation of Welfare Recipients? Journal of Applied Philosophy, 32(4), 373–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Piachaud, D. (2016, November). Citizen’s Income: Rights and Wrongs (CASE/200). Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics.Google Scholar
  13. Warren, N. (2006). The Adjudication Gap: A Discussion Document. Journal of Social Security Law, 13(2), 110–118.Google Scholar
  14. White, S. (2017). Should a Minimum Income Be Unconditional? In S. C. Matteucci & S. Halliday (Eds.), Social Rights in Europe in an Age of Austerity (pp. 181–196). London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Social and Political ScienceUniversity of EdinburghEdinburghUK

Personalised recommendations