Numerical and Experimental Development of Gradient Potential Measurement for Corrosion Detection in Reinforced Concrete

  • S. GarciaEmail author
  • F. Deby
Conference paper
Part of the RILEM Bookseries book series (RILEM, volume 17)


Half-cell potential mapping is commonly used to detect corrosion risks in Civil Engineering structures. This method uses a reference electrode positioned on the surface of concrete for measuring potential difference by using a voltmeter connected to the reinforcement bar. However, there are two major drawbacks in the implementation of this method: the electrical connection to the reinforcement and its electrical continuity. In order to overcome these disadvantages, a new method is proposed. Instead of using electrical connection to rebar, a second reference electrode is used, also positioned on the surface. These two electrodes configuration result in electrical potential gradient on the concrete surface. By performing both experimental work and numerical modelling, this configuration is tested. For experimental work, two reinforced concrete slabs (3 × 3 × 0.15 m) were casted to be close to actual structural conditions. Then corroded areas with controlled sizes are created through a specific device allowing chloride migration. The thickness of the concrete cover has an influence on the measures, which is why the first slab includes rebar where the cover is fixed, while it is variable in the second slab. For modelling, a parametric study using a finite element model is performed. This model allows the study of the influence of several parameters such as resistivity, corroded area size, concrete cover, and also the measurement process. It is the analysis of the corrosion current, as well as potential mapping that allows the correlation between the experimental and modelling results. Discussion of both results concludes feasibility of this method and confirms its benefits compared to usual half-cell potential mapping.


Reinforced concrete Corrosion Modelling Potential Non-destructive testing method 



The authors want to acknowledge the French Public Bank for Investment (BPI) for the funding of ATALANTE project and the Company ETANDEX.


  1. 1.
    Leibbrandt A, Caprari G (2012) Climbing robot for corrosion monitoring of reinforced concrete structure. In: International conference on applied robotics for the power industry 2012, ETH Zurich, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Reichling K, Raupach M (2014) Method to determine electrochemical potential gradients without reinforcement connection in concrete structures. Cement Concr Compos 47:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Raupach M, Reichling K, Wiggenhauser H, Stoppel M, Dobmann G, Kurz J (2009) BETOSCAN—an instrumented mobile robot system for the diagnosis of reinforced concrete floors. In: Proceedings ICCRRR 2008, Kapstadt, South Africa, pp. 24–26Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stratfull RF (1959) Progress report on inhibiting the corrosion of steel in a reinforced concrete bridge. Corrosion 15(6):65–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Guliker J (1997) Development of a galvanic monitoring probe to improve service life prediction of reinforced concrete structures with respect to reinforcement corrosion. Constr Build Mater 11(3):143–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    François R, Arliguie G, Bardy D (1994) Electrode potential measurements of concrete reinforcement for corrosion evaluation. Cem Concr Res 24(3):401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Sohail MG, Laurens S, Deby F, Balayssac JP (2013) Significance of macrocell corrosion of reinforcing steel in partially carbonated concrete: numerical and experimental investigation. Mater Struct 48:217–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elsener B, Andrade C, Gulikers J, Polder R, Raupach M (2003) Half-cell potential measurements—potential mapping on reinforced concrete structures. Mater Struct 36:461–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ait Mokhtar A, Belarbi R, Benboudjema F, Burlion N, Capra B, Carcassès M, Colliat JB, Cussigh F, Deby F, Jacquemot F, Larrard T, Lataste JF, Le Bescop P, Pierre M, Poyet S, Rougeau P, Rougelot T, Sellier A, Séménadisse J, Torrenti JM, Trabelsi A, Turcry P, Godoy HY (2013) Experimental investigation of the variability of concrete durability properties. Cem Concr Res 45:21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gao XX, Deby F, Arliguie G, Lang A, Gourbeyre Y (2014) Création de défauts artificiels sur des âmes en tôles d’éléments en béton, DiagnoBéton 2014. Annales du bâtiment et des travaux publics, Toulouse, France 66(2014):144–148Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    ASTM C 876-91 (1991) Standard test method for half-cell potentials of reinforcing steel in concrete. Annu Book ASTM Stand 4:2Google Scholar

Copyright information

© RILEM 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LMDC, Université de Toulouse, INSA, UPSToulouseFrance

Personalised recommendations