Advertisement

5 A Political Economic Analysis of Transparency in a Digital World

  • Christine BeneschEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 38)

Abstract

In 2013, the Swiss free newspaper “20 Minuten” launched a series of articles, starting with the headline “These are the 20 most honest members of parliament”. On the newspaper’s online platform, readers could also have a look at “the most dishonest members of the National Council” and even browse through a list of all members of parliament (MPs) ranked according to the extent to which they kept their campaign promises. The ranking was possible due to the availability of two online information platforms. The first one, “Smartvote”, is an online voting advice application where candidates for parliamentary elections answer a set of policy questions, and voters can answer the same set of questions to evaluate which candidates best match their preferences. The second information platform is accessible via the website of the Swiss national parliament and offers access to all votes in the National Council (the upper house), including the individual voting behavior of all MPs. The combination of these two information tools allowed the newspaper to compare the MPs’ stated opinions before the elections (i.e. their pre-election promises) with their actual votes on similar policy issues after the elections.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Acquisti A, Taylor C, Wagman L (2016) The economics of privacy. J Econ Lit. 54(2):442–492Google Scholar
  2. Benesch C, Schelker M, Schmid L (2015) Online information and voting: the effects of Smartvote on election outcomes. Working Paper, University of St. Gallen and University of FribourgGoogle Scholar
  3. Benesch C, Bütler M, Hofer KE (2018) Transparency in parliamentary voting. J Public Econ. 163:60–76Google Scholar
  4. Besley T (2006) Principled agents? The political economy of good government. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  5. Carey JM (2008) Legislative voting and accountablity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Garzia D, Marschall S (2012) Voting advice applications under review: the state of research. Int J Electron Gov 5(3):203–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Garzia D, Trechsel AH, Vassil K, Dinas E (2014) Indirect campaigning: past, present and future of voting advice applications. In: Grofman B, Trechsel AH, Franklin M (eds) The internet and democracy in global perspective, vol 31. Springer, pp 25–41Google Scholar
  8. Gersbach H, Liessem V (2008) Incentive contracts and elections for politicians with multi-task problems. J Econ Behav Organ 68(2):401–411CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Holmström B (1979) Moral Hazard and observability. Bell J Econ 10(1):74–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ladner A, Fivaz J (2012) Voting advice applications. In: Kersting N (ed) Electronic democracy. Barbara Budrich Publisher, Leverkusen, Germany, pp 177–198Google Scholar
  11. Pianzola J, Trechsel AH, Schwerdt G, Vassil K, Alvarez MR (2012) The effect of voting advice applications (VAAs) on political preferences - evidence from a randomized field experiment. Paper prepared for 2012 Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, August 30-September 2, 2012Google Scholar
  12. Prat A (2005) The wrong kind of transparency. Am Econ Rev 95(3):862–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Prat A (2006) The more closely we are watched, the better we behave? In: Hood C, Heald D (eds) Transparency: the key to better governance? Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 91–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Prat A, Strömberg D (2013) The political economy of mass media. In: Acemoglu D, Arellano M, Dekel E (eds) Advances in economics and econometrics. Tenth World Congress, vol 2. Applied economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 135–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Schwarz D, Schädel L, Ladner A (2010) Pre-election positions and voting behaviour in parliament: consistency among Swiss MPs. Swiss Polit Sci Rev 16(3):533–564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Snyder JM, Ting MM (2005) Why roll calls? A model of position-taking in legislative voting and elections. J Law Econ Organ 21(1):153–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Yu R (2014) Booming market for data-driven journalism. USA Today, 17 March 2014Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St. Gallen, Swiss Institute for International Economics and Applied Economic ResearchSt.GallenSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations