Advertisement

3 On the Interplay Between Forgetting and Remembering

  • Nikos Askitas
Chapter
Part of the Law, Governance and Technology Series book series (LGTS, volume 38)

Abstract

When mentioned together, remembering and forgetting are usually regarded as opposites: we remember what we do not forget, and we forget what we do not remember. They are also commonly perceived in conjunction with time: we may or may not remember a past event and usually the probability to forget a fact increases with the amount of time passed since we last recalled it. However, it is less the amount of time that is significant here, but more the notion that with the amount of time passed, the forgotten item is displaced by other pieces of information whose number increases with time. In such cases, we forget in the sense that we purge information to accommodate new incoming data. Nonetheless, I will later discuss remembering and forgetting not in time-related cases but rather in terms of informational resolution. In this sense, a picture with high pixel density is a higher resolution image (remembering), while a low pixel density image is one of lower resolution (forgetting). It is important to note here that whatever the case, even the smoothest higher resolution image can be put together by means of a sufficiently high yet finite number of simply specified pixels. In other words, we can forget a high amount of information without affecting the quality of what our eyes perceive.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Einstein A (1905) Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Ann Phys 322(8):549–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Halley JM, Stergiou KI (2005) The implecations of increasing variablity of fish landings. Fish Fish 6(3):266–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Kleinberg J, Ludwig J, Mullainathan S, Obermeyer Z (2015) Prediction policy problems. Am Econ Rev Pap Proc 105(5):491–495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Krause A, Rinne U, Zimmermann K (2012) Anonymous job applications of fresh Ph.D. economists. Econ Lett 117:441–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Mandelbrot B (1967) The variation of some other speculative prices. J Bus 40(4):393–413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Mantegna R, Stanley H (1999) Introduction to econophysics: correlations and complexity in finance. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Press WH, Dyson FJ (2012) Iterated Prisoner’s dilemma contains strategies that dominate any evolutionary opponent. PNAS 109(26):10409–10413CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Sweeney L (2000) Simple demographics often identify people uniquely. Carnegie Mellon University, Data Privacy Working Paper 3Google Scholar
  9. Tufte E (2009) The visual display of quantitative information, 2nd edn. Graphics Press LLC, CheshireGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for the Study of LaborBonnGermany

Personalised recommendations