Setting the Theoretical Scene

  • Jude Howell
  • Xiaoyuan Shang
  • Karen R. Fisher
Chapter

Abstract

Chapter two sets out the theoretical and conceptual framework that informs the research and analysis of accountability and participation in child welfare organisations in China. It begins by providing a review of relevant literature on accountability and legitimacy, noting the predominance of research related to democratic states and to government—citizen relations. It then explores the existing literature, albeit limited, on accountability and legitimacy in authoritarian states. The chapter highlights and combines theories that address the multidimensional nature of accountability, theories that link accountability with participation, and theories that throw light on systemic biases against the marginalised, vulnerable and poor in accountability. The chapter locates the discussion of accountability within a broader theoretical framework around processes of institutional change in authoritarian contexts, notably China.

Keywords

Accountability Participation Legitimacy Authoritarianism Institutional change Theories 

References

  1. Ackerman, J. (2004). Co-governance for accountability: Beyond “exit” and “voice”. World Development, 32(3), 447–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, K. (2009). What NGO accountability means and does not mean. The American Journal of International Law, 103(1), 170–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ashforth, B. E., & Gibbs, B. W. (1990). The double-edge of organisational legitimation. Organisation Science, 1(2), 177–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atack, I. (1999). Four criteria of development NGO legitimacy. World Development, 27(5), 855–864.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bendell, J., & Cox, P. (2006). The donor accountability agenda. In L. Jordan & P. V. Tuijl (Eds.), NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  6. Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brett, E. A. (1993). Voluntary agencies as development organisations: Theorising the problem of efficiency and accountability. Development and Change, 24(2), 269–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brett, E. A. (2003). Participation and accountability in development management. The Journal of Development Studies, 40(2), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brooker, P. (2000). Non-democratic regimes: Theory, government and politics. New York: St. Martin’s PressGoogle Scholar
  10. Burns, J., & Wang, X. (2010). Civil service reform in China: Impacts on civil servants’ behaviour. The China Quarterly, 201, 58–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cai, Y. (2004). Managed participation in China. Political Science Quarterly, 119(3), 425–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cassani, A., (2017). Social services to claim legitimacy: Comparing autocracies’ performance. Journal of contemporary Politics, 23(3), 348–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campbell, J. L. (2004). Institutional Change and Globalisation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Chan, C. K. (2012). Community-based organisations for migrant workers’ rights: The emergence of labour NGOs in China. Journal of Community Development, 48(1), 6–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charnovitz, S. (2007). Accountability of non-governmental organisations in global governance. In L. Jordan & P. Van Tuijl (Eds.), NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations (pp. 21–42). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  16. Chen, Feng. (2003, April). Industrial restructuring and workers’ resistance in China. Modern China, 29(2), 237–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen, F. (2004). Legal mobilization by trade unions: The case of Shanghai. The China Journal, 52, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen, Feng., & Mengxiao, Tang. (2013, April/June). Labour conflicts in China. Typologies and their Implications, Asian Survey, 53,(3), 589–583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cheng, J., Ngok, K. L., & Zhuang, Y. (2010). The survival and development space for China’s labour NGOs: Informal politics and its uncertainty. Asian Survey, 50(6), 1082–1106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dauce, F. (2014). The government and human rights groups in Russia: Civilised oppression? Journal of Civil Society, 10(3), 239–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Diamond, L. (2002). Elections without democracy:Thinking about hybrid regimes. Journal of Democracy,13 (2), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dogra, N. (2012). Representations of Global Poverty: Aid Development and International NGOs. New York: I.B. Tauris.Google Scholar
  23. Dowling, J., & Pfeffer, J. (1975). Organisational legitimacy: Social values and organisational behaviour. The Pacific Sociological Review, 18(1), 122–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Duckett, J., & Wang, H. (2013). Extending political participation in China: New opportunities for citizens in the policy process. Journal of Asian Public Policy, 6(3), 263–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Dukalskis, A., & Gerschewski, J. (2017). What autocracies say (and what citizens hear): Proposing four mechanisms of autocratic legitimation. Contemporary Politics, 23(3), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ebrahim, A. (2003). Accountability in practice: Mechanisms for NGOs. World Development, 31(5), 813–829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Edin, M. (2003a). Remaking the communist party-state: The cadre responsibility system at the local level in China. China: An International Journal, 1(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  28. Edin, M. (2003b). State capacity and local agent control in China. China Quarterly, 173(March), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Edwards, M., & Hulme, D. (Eds.). (1995). Non-governmental Organisations—Performance and Accountability: Beyond the Magic Bullet. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  30. Fehrenbach, E., & Rodogno, D. (2016). ‘A horrific photo of a drowned Syrian child’: Humanitarian photography and NGO media strategies in historical perspective. International Review of the Red Cross, 1, 1–35.Google Scholar
  31. Fishkin, J. S., He, B., Luskin, R. C., & Siu, A. (2010). Deliberative democracy in an unlikely place: Deliberative polling in China. British Journal of Political Science, 40(2), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, J. A., & Brown, L. D. (Eds.). (1998). The Struggle for Accountability: The World Bank, NGOs and Grassroots Movements. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  33. Froissart, Chloe. (2011). NGOs' defending workers’ rights: Semi-union organisations contribute to the regime’s dynamic stability. China Perspectives, 2, 18–25.Google Scholar
  34. Geall, S. (2012, May 13). The Yangtze’s latest dam construction shows the hollowness of China’s ‘breakthrough’ FoI legislation. Guardian Comment Network. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/may/13/china-freedom-of-information-yangtze-dams.
  35. Gleiss, M. S. (2014). How Chinese labour NGOs legitimate their identity and voice. China Information, 28(3), 362–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Goetz, A., & Jenkins, R. (2005). Reinventing Accountability: Making Democracy Work for Human Development. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hacker, J. S. (2010). Policy drift: The hidden politics of US welfare state retrenchment. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond Continuity: Institutional Change in Advanced Political Economies (pp. 40–82). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Hasmath, R., & Hsu, J. (2008). NGOs in China and issues of accountability. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 30(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. He, B. (2011). Civil engagement through participatory budgeting in China: Three different logics at work. Public Administration and Development, 31(2), 122–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. He, B., & Thogersen, S. (2010). Giving the people a voice? Experiments with consultative authoritarian institutions in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 19(66), 675–692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. He, B., & Warren, M. E. (2011). Authoritarian deliberation: The deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on Politics, 9(2), 269–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Heilmann, S. (2009). From local experiments in national policy: The origins of China’s distinctive policy process. In A. Kipnis, L. Tomba, & U. Jonathan (Eds.), Contemporary Chinese Society and Politics (pp. 183–211). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. Heilmann, S., & Perry, E. J. (2011). Mao’s Invisible Hand: The Political Foundations of Adaptive Governance in China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Heimer, M. (2006). The cadre responsibility system and the changing needs of the party. In K. E. Brodsgaard & Y. Zheng (Eds.), The Chinese Communist Party in Reform (pp. 122–138). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Hilhorst, D. (2003). The Real World of NGOs. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  46. Howell, J. (2007). Village elections in China: Recent prospects, new challenges. Etudes Rurales, 179(January–June), 213–234.Google Scholar
  47. Howell, J., & Pearce, J. (2001). Civil Society and Development: A Critical Exploration. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
  48. Hulme, D., & Edwards, M. (Eds.). (1997). NGOs, States and Donors: Too Close for Comfort? New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  49. Jacka, T., & Wu, C. R. (2015). Village self-government and representation in southwest China. Journal of Contemporary China, 46(1), 1–24.Google Scholar
  50. Kilby, P. (2006). Accountability for empowerment: Dilemmas facing non-governmental organizations. World Development, 34(6), 951–963.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Kovach, Hetty. (2007). Addressing accountability at the global level: The challenges facing international NGOs. In L. Jordan & P. Van Tuijl (Eds.), NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations (pp. 195–210). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  52. Landry, P. F., Davis, D., & Wang, S. (2010). Elections in rural China: Competition without parties. Comparative Political Studies, 43(6), 763–790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lee, C. K., & Shen, Y. (2011). The anti-solidarity machine? Labor nongovernmental organizations in China. In S. Kuruvilla, C. K. Lee, & M. E. Gallagher (Eds.), From Iron Rice Bowl to Informalization: Markets, Workers, and the State in a Changing China (pp. 173–187). Ithaca and London: ILR Press and Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. LeRoux, K. (2009). Paternalistic or participatory governance? Examining opportunities for client participation in nonprofit social service organizations. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 504–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Leung, T. T. F. (2008). Accountability to welfare service users: Challenges and responses of service providers. British Journal of Social Work, 38(3), 531–545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Linz, J. (1970). An authoritarian regime: Spain. In E. Allardt & S. Rokkan, (Eds.), Mass politics: Studies in political sociology. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  57. Looney, K. E. (2015). China’s campaign to build a new socialist countryside: Village modernisation, peasant councils and the Ganzhou model of rural development. The China Quarterly, 224, 909–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Luo, R., Zhang, L., Huang, J., & Rozelle, S. (2010). Village elections, public goods investments and pork barrel politics, Chinese-style. Journal of Development Studies, 46(4), 662–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ma, J. (2009). The dilemma of developing financial accountability without elections. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ma, J. (2012). The rise of social accountability in China. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mahoney, J., & Thelen, K. (Eds.). (2010). Explaining Institutional Change: Ambiguity, Agency and Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Martin, G. P. (2011). The third sector, user involvement and public service reform: A case study in the co-governance of health service provision. Public Administration, 89(3), 909–932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Mattei, Paola. (2007). Managerial and political accountability: The widening gap in the organisaiton of welfare. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 365–387.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Minzner, C. F. (2006). Xinfang: An alternative to formal Chinese legal institutions. Stanford Journal of International Law, 42, 103–179.Google Scholar
  65. Najam, A. (1996). NGO accountability: A conceptual framework. Development Policy Review, 14(4), 339–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nathan, A. J. (2003). Authoritarian resilience. Journal of Democracy, 14(1), 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Nathan, A. J. (2009). Authoritarian impermanence. Journal of Democracy, 20(3), 37–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Norris, J. (2014). Rethinking accountability in new governance. The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(3), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (1999). Selective policy implementation in rural China. Comparative Politics, 31(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. O’Brien, K. J., & Li, L. (2004). Suing the local state: Administrative litigation in rural China. The China Journal, 51, 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. O’Brien, K. J., & Han, R. (2009). Path to democracy? Assessing village elections in China. Journal of Contemporary China, 18(60), 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Peruzzotti, E. (2007). Civil society, representation and accountability: Restating current debates on the representativeness and accountability of civic associations. In L. Jordan & P. Van Tuijl (Eds.), NGO Accountability: Politics, Principles and Innovations (pp. 43–60). London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  73. Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. (1978). The External Control of Organisations: A Resource Dependence Perspective. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
  74. Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 13(4), 475–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Pollitt, C., & Hupe, P. (2011). Talking about government: The role of magic concepts. Public Management Review, 13(5), 641–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Putnam, R. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalisation. A Critical Introduction (2nd ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  78. Scholte, J. A. (2011). Building Global Democracy? Civil Society and Accountable Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Shambaugh, D. (2008). China’s Communist Party: Atrophy and Adaptation. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Centre Press.Google Scholar
  80. Smulovitz, C., & Peruzzotti, E. (2000). Societal accountability in Latin America. Journal of Democracy, 11(4), 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Speer, J. (2012). Participatory governance reform: A good strategy for increasing government responsiveness and improving public services? World Development, 40(12), 2379–2398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. The Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Tan, X. (2014). Constructing a performance-based accountability system for the Chinese government. Journal of Public Affairs, 14(2), 154–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Thireau, I., & Hua, L. (2003). The moral universe of aggrieved Chinese workers: Workers’ appeals to arbitration committees and letters and visits offices. The China Journal, 50, 83–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tsai, L. (2007). Accountability Without Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Van Rooy, A. (Ed.). (1998). Civil Society and the Aid Industry. London: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  87. Weber, M. (1964). The Theory of Social and Economic Organisation. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  88. Whiting, S. (2004). The cadre evaluation system at the grassroots: The paradox of party rule. In B. Naughton & D. Yang (Eds.), Holding China Together. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  89. Willems, T., & Van Dooren, W. (2007). Coming to terms with accountability: Combining multiple forums and functions. Public Management Review, 14(7), 1011–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Wintrobe, R. (1998). The Political Economy of Dictatorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. World Bank. (2005). Societal Accountability in the Public Sector. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  92. Wu, Y., & Wang, W. (2012). Does participatory budgeting improve the legitimacy of the local government? A comparative case study of two cities in China. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 71(2), 122–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Xu, X. (2012). On the new model of public participation models in the micro-blog era: Take Guo Meimei as an example. Lanzhou Academic Journal, 2(1), 66–71.Google Scholar
  94. Yan, X., & Ge, X. (2016). Participatory policy-making under authoritarianism: The pathways of local budgetary reform in the P.R. of China. Policy and Politics, 44(2), 215–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yao, Y. (2009). Village elections and redistribution of political power and collective property. The China Quarterly, 197, 126–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Yu, X. D. (2010). Citizen participation and its impacts on people’s wellbeing. Zhejiang Social Science, 1, 34–51.Google Scholar
  97. Zhong, L. J., & Mol, A. P. J. (2008). Participatory environmental governance in China: Public hearings on urban water tariff setting. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 899–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jude Howell
    • 1
  • Xiaoyuan Shang
    • 2
  • Karen R. Fisher
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of International DevelopmentLondon School of Economics and Political ScienceLondonUK
  2. 2.Social Policy Research CentreUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  3. 3.Social Policy Research CentreUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations