• Jürgen H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik
  • Uwe Warner
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Population Studies book series (BRIEFSPOPULAT)


This chapter outlines the tasks of the respondents. Particular attention must be paid to ensuring that the survey questions can be understood by the respondents. It must also be ensured that the response categories of the sociodemographic questions are derived from the respondents’ cultural context.


Interview interaction Answering survey questions 


  1. Baddeley, A. (2003). Working memory and language: An overview. Journal of Communication Disorders, 36, 189–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Casimir, G. J., & Tobi, H. (2011). Defining and using the concept of household: A systematic review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 35, 498–506.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Gerber, E. R., de la Puente, M., & Levin, M. J. (1998). Race, identity, and new question options: Final report of cognitive research on race and ethnicity. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  4. Gerber, E. R., Wellens, T. R., & Keeley, C. (1996). “Who lives here?” The use of vignettes in household roster research. In Proceedings of the Section on Survey Research Methods (pp. 962–967). Alexandria, VA: American Statistical Association. Retrieved on January 26, 2018.
  5. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. H. P., & Warner, U. (2009). Private household concepts and their operationalisation in cross-national social surveys. Metodološki zvezki, 6(1), 1–26.Google Scholar
  6. Martin, E. (2006). Survey questionnaire construction. Research Report Series. Survey Methodology #2006–13. Washington, DC: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  7. Martin, E. A., & Gerber, E. R. (2005). Results of recent methodological research on the Hispanic origin and race questions. Research Report Series (Survey Methodology #2005–04). Washington D.C.: U.S. Bureau of the Census.Google Scholar
  8. Schaeffer, N. C., & Presser, S. (2003). The science of asking questions. Annual Revue of Sociology, 29, 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Schwarz, N. (2007). Cognitive aspects of survey methodology. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 277–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Walton, L., Stange, M., Powell, R. J., & Belli, R. F. (2012). Exploring interviewer and respondent interactions: An innovative behavior coding approach. Paper Presented at the 2012 Midwest Association of Public Opinion Research (MAPOR).Google Scholar
  11. Warner, U., & Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik, J. H. P. (2005). Measuring income in comparative social survey research. In J. H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik & J. A. Harkness (Eds.), Methodological aspects in cross-national research (pp. 203–221). ZUMA-Nachrichten Spezial 11.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Political ScienceJustus Liebig University GiessenGiessenGermany
  2. 2.Methodenzentrum SozialwissenschaftenGeorg-August-Universität GöttingenGöttingenGermany

Personalised recommendations