Skip to main content
  • 607 Accesses

Abstract

The New Year’s Eve party is over and President Carlos Salinas de Gortari has gone to bed happy, knowing that towards the end of his presidency Mexico is now entering “the First World.” With the NAFTA entering into effect with the New Year, Mexico, Canada, and the United States of America would now establish a “free trade zone” under which goods and services would now move freely between those three countries. Not people, however, but that is a different story. Of course, that would also mean the full exposure of Mexican small-scale agricultural producers to unfair competition by the North American multinationals that were producing more cheaply and in larger quantities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These documents that are related to Mexico’s Guerra Sucia (some 80 million of them) were made available to the public in 2002, during the presidency of Vicente Fox, and were placed in the National Archive. Historian Jaime Pensado argues that those documents were declassified in an effort to uncover the PRI’s authoritarianism in those years (Pensado 2013, 11). His claim may have some substance, considering that access-restrictions were later imposed on the very same documents in 2015, under the Presidency of Enrique Peña Nieto, which marked the return of the PRI to power. It is believed that those restrictions were related to the case of the 43 desaparecidos of Ayotzinapa rural school.

  2. 2.

    Mestizaje: racial mixing between Indigenous Mexicans and Mexicans of Spanish origin.

  3. 3.

    PRI (officially founded in 1929): successor of Partido Revolucionario Mexicano (Mexican Revolutionary Party), which emerged after the end of the Mexican Revolution (1920) and had been governing the country since then and until 2000.

  4. 4.

    Electoral autocracies are societies in which a single party keeps ruling, even though elections (partly free/fair) may be regularly taking place.

  5. 5.

    As Pacheco-López (2005: 595) summarizes: “Since the mid-1980s, the propensity to import has exceeded the propensity to export, and this has worsened the growth rate consistent with balanced trade, which is a major explanation of the slowdown of Mexico’s growth that was promised by the Mexico’s political leaders at the time.”

  6. 6.

    Indigenous political bosses who used to control the state projects and used to have a monopoly on transport, markets, and access to credit.

  7. 7.

    The ejido is one of the principal forms of land ownership in Mexico. It is distinct from private property because it is the result of a government land grant (dotación) to groups that have applied for the land and it is managed collectively through an ejido commission, which defines the use of the ejido lands amongst the members of the ejido (Harvey 2005: 648).

  8. 8.

    Some theorists call the movement “neo-zapatistas,” viewing them as a continuation of the original Zapatistas (the supporters of Emiliano Zapata) of 1910–1919.

  9. 9.

    Interview of Fernando Yáñez Muñoz to La Jornada, as cited by Hernandez Millan (2007, 266; Petrich 2003).

  10. 10.

    For more information on this issue, see Kruijt (2016, 2017).

  11. 11.

    Other analysts (A. Cedillo 2010a, b) speak of foco Guerrillero, or foquismo, but Fernando Yáñez prefers to call it núcleo: “We formed a núcleo Guerrillero…I think Ché Guevara never used the word foco” (Petrich 2003, author’s translation from Spanish).

  12. 12.

    Indigenous Maya nations.

  13. 13.

    It should be noted here that the fate of most of the members of the NGEZ still remains unknown. While for some of them it is known that they were arrested at some point by the army or the police—even the date and place of detention is known in some cases—we still do not know what happened to them afterwards. Some surviving members of the FLN—including the brother of César Germán Yáñez Muñoz, Fernando—have established an organization that preserves the history of the FLN and investigates the fate of its missing members. They call it Casa de Todas y Todos.

  14. 14.

    This refers to the Isthmus of Tehuantepec, a region which comprises parts of the states of Oaxaca, Chiapas, Tabasco, and Veracruz, in which the distance between the Atlantic and the Pacific coast is only 215 kilometres.

  15. 15.

    The FLN, as well as the EZLN, never accepted the fact that the members of the NGEZ have passed away. They prefer to still consider them “desaparecidos.”

  16. 16.

    As Cedillo notes in her research, and I also observed during my fieldwork, there is a certain reluctance on the part of the FLN/EZLN members to accept the possibility of the death of their comrades. “Your thinking is right, they may be dead,” I was told by a Zapatista friend during my fieldwork, “But let’s call them ‘disappeared’, because if you call them ‘dead’, you are killing them already in your mind” (author’s fieldwork notes, Summer 2012). Subcomandante Marcos also follows this tendency: in a speech on 17 November 2006, he mentions the fallen heroes of EZLN, describing some of them—César Germán Yáñez Muñoz, for example—as desaparecidos. The day the EZLN still commemorates its fallen heroes is 14 February.

  17. 17.

    It was kind of a tradition for the FLN to adopt the pseudonyms of their fallen comrades, as a way of keeping their memory alive. Subcomandante Marcos himself, who entered the FLN as Zacarias , would later—allegedly—adopt the nom de guerre of a fallen comrade of his, Mario Marcos. The same is the case for the legendary Subcomandante Pedro, who adopted his own pseudonym in honour of César Germán Yáñez Muñoz (Compañero Pedro) (Sellschopp 2004, 92).

  18. 18.

    Mario and Ruth would rejoin later on.

  19. 19.

    The government sent in more than a thousand soldiers on 10 June 1976 and killed dozens of indigenous chol and tsotsil, threw two of them into the river from helicopters, raped women, imprisoned hundreds of others, and so on.

  20. 20.

    It is indicative that during my fieldwork in Chiapas (summer 2012), a new church was being constructed in one of the Zapatista caracoles.

  21. 21.

    The EZLN uses the same system of self-teaching in their autonomous education system. The students themselves become promotores (promoters of education) and leave for their villages in order to train the next students. In addition, similar to the—seemingly successful—strategy of the first recruitments, the graduates of the Zapatista Education acquire several skills (agro-ecology, shoemaking, medicine, communication, etc.), which become the knowledge that they transmit to their own communities.

  22. 22.

    There was a section called “Nuestros Heroes” (Our Heroes) in “Nepantla.” The FLN/EZLN still do not forget to honour their fallen comrades. In some of the Zapatista caracoles, one can still see photographs of them, while there is also a Zapatista song composed by EZLN members dedicated to them, which is called “Heroes y Martyres” (Heroes and Martyrs).

  23. 23.

    Because of the numerous such bugs in the area.

  24. 24.

    Author’s translation from Spanish. Author’s archive.

  25. 25.

    “The indigenous told us…that not even God goes there!…not even us the indigenous live there” would say later on Subcomandante Marcos (Le Bot and Marcos 1997).

  26. 26.

    The explanation I received during my fieldwork (summer, 2012) was that basketball pitches serve multiple purposes: community meetings, parades, celebrations, and of course for…the game itself!

  27. 27.

    While it seems that in the course of the struggle gender roles were re-interpreted and the emancipation of women was slowly being achieved, and even though this is an extremely interesting development, further exploration of this issue is however beyond the scope of this research. The reason is that the issue is so extended that it would require a whole new book to be written on it only.

  28. 28.

    Fernando Yañez says that there were 200–300 representatives of Zapatista communities. He also mentions that the whole process was filmed, but the videos are being kept outside Mexico (Interview with Petrich 2003). In an interview he conducted with the author of this book, he repeated that the whole process was filmed and that the FLN still has that video which confirms his words.

  29. 29.

    Interview of Fernando Yañez with Leonidas Oikonomakis, 13 January 2016.

  30. 30.

    The day Mexico was entering “the First World” with the NAFTA put into effect.

  31. 31.

    The initial plan according to Marcos was to march forward as far away as possible from the communities (…all the way to Mexico City if possible). The reason was twofold: (a) for the battles to take place away from the communities and (b) for the communities to prepare themselves for the resistance to the army attack that was expected to follow (Le Bot and Marcos 1997).

  32. 32.

    For a detailed analysis of the government proposals and the reasons why they were rejected, consult the relevant announcement by the CCRI (CCRI del E Z L N 1994b).

  33. 33.

    The aforementioned communique is the instrument that publically mentions autonomy for the first time in a written form. However, during the dialogues of the Cathedral, the word autonomy was mentioned by EZLN representatives as a demand in at least two press conferences that took place in February 1994 as well.

  34. 34.

    The reasons for calling it a “non plan” are analysed in the next chapter.

  35. 35.

    Larráinzar was the name of the landowner to whom the area used to belong.

  36. 36.

    “The discussion around this point generally hinged on what kind of definition of power would be used in such a statement, and the general feeling in the working groups was that the principle of ‘not struggling to take power’ implied the taking of State or institutional power, rather than a prohibition on the exercise of that power which lies in the people and society as a whole” (14 September 1997, CNI Assembly Second Day of the FZLN Congress).

Bibliography

  • Abraham (FLN). (1979, de Diciembre de). Leyes vs Trabajadores. Nepantla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bob, C. (2005). The Marketing of Rebellion: Insurgents, Media, and International Activism (Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonfil Batalla, G. (1996). Mexico Profundo: Reclaiming a Civilization. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brass, T. (2005). Neoliberalism and the Rise of (Peasant) Nations within the Nation: Chiapas in Comparative and Theoretical Perspective. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 32(3–4), 651–691.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Casa de Todas y Todos. (n.d.). Efemérides Octubre, ‘no Se Olvida’…. | LaCasa. http://casadetodasytodos.org/memoria/efemerides-octubre-2015-octubre-no-se-olvida/. Accessed 15 Jan 2016.

  • Castillo, R. A. H. (2006). The Indigenous Movement in Mexico Between Electoral Politics and Local Resistance. Latin American Perspectives, 33(2), 115–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CCRI del E Z L N. (1994a). Pliego de Demandas Del EZLN Presentado En Los Diálogos de La Catedral.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCRI del E Z L N. (1994b). Réplica a Las Propuestas Del Gobierno.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedillo, A. (2008). El Fuego y el Silencio. Historia de las Fuerzas de Liberacion Nacional Mexicanas (1969–1974). México: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedillo, A. (2010a). El suspiro del silencio. De la reconstrucción de las Fuerzas de Liberación Nacional a la fundación del Ejército Zapatista de Liberación Nacional (1974–1983). México: UNAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cedillo, A. C. (2010b). La Comunidad Armada Rebelde Y El EZLN de Marco Estrada. Pacarina Del Sur. Revista de Pensamiento Cr’tico Latinoamericano, 4. http://www.pacarinadelsur.com/home/senas-y-resenas/126-la-comunidad-armada-rebelde-y-el-ezln-de-marco-estrada

  • Cedillo, A. (2012). Armed Struggle without Revolution: The Organizing Process of the National Liberation Forces (FLN) and the Genesis of Neo-Zapatism (1969–1983). In A. Cedillo & F. H. Calderón (Eds.), Challenging Authoritarianism in Mexico: Revolutionary Struggles and the “Dirty War”, 1964–1982 (Paperback). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier, G. A., & Collier, J. F. (2005). The Zapatista Rebellion in the Context of Globalization. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 32(3–4), 450–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier, G. A., & Quaratiello, E. L. (2005). Basta!: Land and the Zapatista Rebellion in Chiapas (3rd ed.). Food First Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compañero Alfredo. (1976). Comunicado Confidencial a Todos Los Militantes de Las F.L.N.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compañero Pedro, FLN. (1969). Comunicado Confidencial a: Todos Los Miembros de Las Fuerzas de Liberacion Nacional Sobre La Militancia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compañero Pedro, FLN. (1970a). A Todos Los Militantes de Las Fuerzas de Liberacion Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compañero Pedro, FLN. (1970b). Comunicado Confidencial a: Todos Los Responsables de Cada Red Local.

    Google Scholar 

  • Compañero Pedro, FLN. (1971a). 6 Agosto 1971 (Faltan Paginas).

    Google Scholar 

  • Compañero Pedro, FLN. (1972). A Todos Los Militantes de Las Fuerzas de Liberacion Nacional.

    Google Scholar 

  • De León, A. G. (2005). From Revolution to Transition: The Chiapas Rebellion and the Path to Democracy in Mexico. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 32(3–4), 508–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dela Grange, B., & Rico, M. (1999, February). El Otro Subcomandante: Entrevista Con Salvador Morales Garibay. Letras Libres.

    Google Scholar 

  • El Proceso. (1995a, July 31). ‘Napoleón Glockner No Traicionó Ni Fue Ajusticiado Por Las FLN; Fue Asesinado Por La Policía’: Su Hijo Fritz. Proceso. http://www.proceso.com.mx/169731/napoleon-glockner-no-traiciono-ni-fue-ajusticiado-por-las-fln-fue-asesinado-por-la-policia-su-hijo-fritz

  • El Proceso. (1995b, August 13). Minerva Glockner, Testigo de Primera Linea. Proceso. http://www.proceso.com.mx/169868/minerva-glockner-testigo-de-primera-linea

  • EZLN. (1996). Fourth Declaration of Selva Lacandona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitting, E. (2006). Importing Corn, Exporting Labor: The Neoliberal Corn Regime, GMOs, and the Erosion of Mexican Biodiversity. Agriculture and Human Values, 23(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FLN. (1969). Comunicado a Todos Los Miembros de Las FLN: Sobre La Militancia.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLN. (1980b, March 15). Editorial. Nepantla, no.9, Año II.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLN. (1980d, March 15). Nuestra Historia. Nepantla, no 9, Año II.

    Google Scholar 

  • FLN. (2003). Statutes of the Forces of National Liberation. Pamphlet: Abraham Guillen Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerzas de Liberación Nacional. (1976). Comunicado Confidencial a Todos Los Militantes de Las F.L.N. Recuerdo de La Companera Aurora, Julieta Glockner Rossainz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuerzas de Liberación Nacional. (1977). Comunicado Confidencial a Todos Los Militantes de Las F.L.N.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson, C. (2013). The Provocative Cocktail. Intellectual Origins of the Zapatista Uprising. 1960–1994. New York: The City University of New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, N. (1998). The Chiapas Rebellion: The Struggle for Land and Democracy. Durham/London: Duke University Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, N. (2005). Who Needs Zapatismo? State Interventions and Local Responses in Marqués de Comillas, Chiapas. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 32(3–4), 629–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, N. (2015). Las Fuerzas de Liberación Nacional Y La Guerra Fria En Mexico (1969–1974). In FLN (Ed.), Las Fuerzas de Liberación Nacional Y La Guerra Fria En Mexico (1969–1974). Cuadernos de Trabajo. Dignificar La Historia I. Monterrery Nuevo León: Grupo Editorial de la Casa de Todas y Todos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, N. (2016). Practicing Autonomy: Zapatismo and Decolonial Liberation. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, 11(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17442222.2015.1094872.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henck, N. (2007). Subcommander Marcos: The Man and the Mask. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Henck, N. (2016). Insurgent Marcos: The Political-Philosophical Formation of the Zapatista Subcommander. History and Social Sciences. Raleigh: Editorial A Contracorriente.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriquez, E. (2009, November 17). EZLN, 26 anos de historia. Cuarto Poder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernandez Millan, A. (2007). Origines Y Antecedentes Del EZLN. Espacios Libres, 10(019), 264–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jung, C. (2003). The Politics of Indigenous Identity: Neoliberalism, Cultural Rights, and the Mexican Zapatistas. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 70(2), 433–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruijt, D. (2016). The Cuban Connection: The Departamnto América and the Latin American Revolutions. In A. M. Álvarez & E. R. Tristán (Eds.), Revolutionary Violence and the New Left : Transnational Perspectives. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruijt, D. (2017). Cuba and Revolutionary Latin America. Zed Books. http://www.press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/distributed/C/bo25073325.html

  • Le Bot, Y., & Marcos, S. (1997). El sueno Zapatista. San Cristóbal de Las Casas, Chiapas, Mexico: Ediciones Pirata.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, S. (1995). Interview with Marcos about Neoliberalism, the National State and Democracy – Autumn 1995 Brecha. http://www.struggle.ws/mexico/ezln/inter_marcos_aut95.html

  • Marcos, S. (1997). The Seven Loose Pieces of the Global Jigsaw Puzzle. Ya Basta!–Ten Years of the Zapatista Uprising.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, S. (2004). Our Word Is Our Weapon: Selected Writings (Juana Ponce De Leon, Ed.). Abridged. New York: Seven Stories Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcos, S. (2008). Audio Message by Subcommandante Insurgente Marcos. In S. Ramírez (Ed.), The Fire and the Word: A History of the Zapatista Movement. San Francisco: City Lights Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mario (FLN). (1980, March 15). Gonzalo. Nepantla.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, E., & Masferrer, E. (1979). La Poblacion Indigena de America en 1978. America Indigena, 39(2), 217–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, R. (1983a, May 28). Fugitive Puerto Rican Terrorist Arrested in Mexico. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden, R. (1983b, May 29). Extradition of Terrorist From Mexico to Be Sought. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muñoz Ramírez, G. (2008). The Fire and the Word. San Francisco: City Lights Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, J. C. (2001). Mayan Visions: The Quest for Autonomy in an Age of Globalization. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Connor, F. P., & Oikonomakis, L. (2015). Preconflict Mobilization Strategies and Urban-Rural Transition: The Cases of the PKK and the FLN/EZLN. Mobilization: An International Quarterly, 20(3), 379–399. https://doi.org/10.17813/1086-671X-20-3-379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomakis, L. (2012a, December 21). Zapatistas: To Be Heard We March in Silence. ROARMAG.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oikonomakis, L. (2012b, December 26). Chiapas Cries Out: The Sound of Zapatista Silence. ROARMAG. http://roarmag.org/2012/12/chiapas-zapatista-ezln-marcos-silence/

  • Pacheco-López, P. (2005). The Effect of Trade Liberalization on Exports, Imports, the Balance of Trade, and Growth: The Case of Mexico. Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 27(4), 595–619.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pensado, J. (2013). Rebel Mexico: Student Unrest and Authoritarian Political Culture During the Long Sixties. Stanford: Stanford University Press. http://www.amazon.com/Jaime-Pensado-Rebel-Mexico-Authoritarian/dp/B00SCUVCES.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Petrich, B. (2003). Habla Fernando Yañez. Rebeldia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (2002). The War Against Oblivion: The Zapatista Chronicles. Monroe: Common Courage Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, J. (2006). Zapatistas!: Making Another World Possible: Chronicles of Resistance, 2000–2006. New York: Nation Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinas de Gortari, C. (2002). México: The Policy and Politics of Modernization. Barcelona: Plaza & Janés.

    Google Scholar 

  • Salinas de Gortari, C. (2014). Habla Salinas de Gortari del asesinato de Colosio y el EZLN (VIDEO) – Diario CAMBIO. http://www.diariocambio.com.mx/2014/nacional/item/46224-habla-salinas-de-gortari-del-asesinato-de-colosio-y-el-ezln#ixzz2t255RtJl

  • Segretaria de Gobernacion. (1974). Captura de Las Fuerzas de Liberacion Nacional En Nepantla. Centro de Investigaciones Historicas de los Movimientos Armados, Mandeville Special Collections Library, University of California, San Diego. D.F.S.-14-II-74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sellschopp, A. A. (2004). Nudo de serpientes. Ediciones de El Animal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, M. (2000). The Origins of the Zapatista National Army (EZLN). Washington, DC: Committee of Indigenous Solidarity (CIS-DC).

    Google Scholar 

  • Speed, S., & Collier, J. F. (2000). Limiting Indigenous Autonomy in Chiapas, Mexico: The State Government’s Use of Human Rights. Human Rights Quarterly, 22(4), 877–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stahler-Sholk, R. (2007). Resisting Neoliberal Homogenization: The Zapatista Autonomy Movement. Latin American Perspectives, 34(2), 48–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trejo, G. (2012). Popular Movements in Autocracies: Religion, Repression, and Indigenous Collective Action in Mexico (Cambridge Studies in Comparative Politics). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varese, S. (1991). Think Locally, Act Globally. Report on the Americas, 25(3), 13–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vodovnik, Z. (Ed.). (2004). Ya Basta!: Ten Years of the Zapatista Uprising. In Ya Basta!: Ten Years of the Zapatista Uprising. AK Pr Distribution.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yashar, D. J. (2005). Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge (Cambridge Studies in Contentious Politics). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zugman, K. A. (2005). Zapatismo and Urban Political Practice. Latin American Perspectives, 32(4), 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Oikonomakis, L. (2019). The Zapatistas. In: Political Strategies and Social Movements in Latin America. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90203-6_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics