Skip to main content

Approaching Secondary School Geometry Through the Logic of Inquiry Within Technological Environments

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1316 Accesses

Part of the book series: Mathematics Education in the Digital Era ((MEDE,volume 12))

Abstract

The chapter illustrates a pedagogically innovative way of using mobile technology to support the transition from an empirical to a more theoretical and logical approach to geometry . We propose an approach that shows the possibility of discovering geometric theorem statements and appreciating their universal truth using a suitable pedagogical design that draws on the work of the Finnish logician J. Hintikka as well as on Dick and Zbiek’s notions of pedagogical, mathematical and cognitive fidelities. We implement it through game-based activities , namely group activities in which, first, students play a game in a dynamic geometry environment (DGE) and then, guided by the questions contained in a worksheet task, investigate the geometric property on which the game is designed. In the worksheet task, students are asked to act as detectives using the game to investigate, formulate and check conjectures. In order to analyse the students’ productions we use a cognitive model elaborated from Saada-Robert’s psychological model, which properly describes the cognitive modalities and the empirical versus theoretical and logical approaches to geometry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By invariant, we do not mean a property preserved by dragging , but a property repeated each time a player reaches the goal.

References

  • Artigue, M., & Perrin-Glorian, M. J. (1991). Didactic engineering, research and development tool: some theoretical problems linked to this duality. For the Learning of Mathematics, 11(1), 13–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Andriano, V., Olivero, F., & Robutti, O. (1998). In: L. Magnani, N. J. Nersessian, & P. Thagard (Eds.), Abduction and Scientific Discovery, Special Issue of Philosophica, 61(1), 77–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Olivero, F., Paola, D., & Robutti, O. (2002). A cognitive analysis of dragging practises in Cabri environments. ZDM: ZentralblattfürDitaktikderMathematik, 34(3), 6–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arzarello, F., Bussi, M. G. B., Leung, A. Y. L., Mariotti, M. A., & Stevenson, I. (2012). Experimental approaches to theoretical thinking: artefacts and proofs. In Proof and proving in mathematics education (pp. 97–143). The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boero, P., Garuti, R., Lemut, E., & Mariotti, M. A. (1996). Challenging the traditional school approach to theorems: A hypothesis about the cognitive unity of theorems. In L. Puig, & A. Gutierrez (Eds.), Proceedings of 20th PME Conference (Vol. 2, pp. 113–120). Valencia, Spain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, T. P. (2008). Fidelity in technological tools for mathematics education. In G. Blume & M. Reid (Eds.), Research on technology and the teaching and learning of mathematics: Cases and perspectives (Vol. 2, pp. 333–339). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duval, R. (1991). Structure du raisonnementdéductif et apprentissage de la démonstration. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(3), 233–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dvora, T. (2012). Unjustified assumptions in geometry made by high school students in Israel. Ph.D. dissertation, Tel Aviv University—The Jaime and Joan Constantiner School of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Freitas, A. A., & de Freitas, M. M. (2013). Classroom Live: A software-assisted gamification tool. Computer Science Education, 23(2), 186–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischbein, E. (1982). Intuition and proof. For the Learning of Mathematics, 3(2), 8–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (2000). A study of proof conceptions in algebra. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(4), 396–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1998). The principles of mathematics revisited. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hintikka, J. (1999). Inquiry as inquiry: A logic of scientific discovery. Dordrecht: Springer Science + Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laborde, C. (2001). Integration of technology in the design of geometry tasks with cabri-geometry. International Journal of Computers for Mathematical Learning, 6(3), 283–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin, K. (2015). The search for fidelity in geometry apps: An exercise in futility. In M. Marshman, V. Geiger, & A. Bennison (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia. Mathematics Education in the Margins (pp. 133–140). Sunshine Coast: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontjev, A. N. (1976/1964). Problemi dello sviluppo psichico. In Riuniti & Mir (Eds.), Problems of psychic development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peirce, C. S. (1960). Collected papers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants Part 1. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, K., Klieme, E., & Heinze, A. (2001). Prerequisites for the understanding of proofs in the geometry classroom. In M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen (Ed.), Proceedings of the 25th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (Vol. 4, pp. 97–104). Utrecht: PME.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saada-Robert, M. (1989). La microgénèse de la rapresentation d’un problème. Psychologie Française, 34, 2–3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, N., & Yurita, V. (2008). To be or to become: How dynamic geometry changes discourse. Research in Mathematics Education, 10(2), 135–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sfard, A., & Linchevski, L. (1994). The gains and the pitfalls of reification: The case of algebra. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 26(2/3), 191–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soldano, C., & Arzarello, F. (2016). Learning with touchscreen devices: Game strategies to improve geometric thinking. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 28(1), 9–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swan, C. (2012, May–June). Gamification: A new way to shape behavior. Communication World, 29, 13–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarski, A. (1933). “The concept of truth in the languages of the deductive sciences” (Polish), PraceTowarzystwaNaukowegoWarszawskiego, Wydzial III NaukMatematyczno-Fizycznych 34, Warsaw; expanded in English Translation in Tarski 1983. In J. Corcoran (Ed.), Logic, semantics, metamathematics, papers from 1923 to 1938 (pp. 152–278) Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, D. R., Senk, S. L., & Johnson, G. J. (2012). Opportunities to learn reasoning and proof in high school mathematics textbooks. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 43(3), 253–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S. E. (2003). The uses of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zbiek, R. M., Heid, M. K., Blume, G. W., & Dick, T. P. (2007). Research on technology in mathematics education: A perspective of constructs. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 1169–1207). Charlotte, NC: Information Age.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlotta Soldano .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Soldano, C., Arzarello, F. (2018). Approaching Secondary School Geometry Through the Logic of Inquiry Within Technological Environments. In: Calder, N., Larkin, K., Sinclair, N. (eds) Using Mobile Technologies in the Teaching and Learning of Mathematics. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 12. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90179-4_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90179-4_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90178-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90179-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics