Advertisement

Machine Translation Between Turkic Languages

  • A. Cüneyd TantuğEmail author
  • Eşref Adalı
Chapter
Part of the Theory and Applications of Natural Language Processing book series (NLP)

Abstract

Turkish belongs to the Turkic family of languages and these languages exhibit tremendous similarity when it comes to morphological and grammatical structure but have somewhat different lexicons owing to various historical, geographical, and cultural interactions with neighboring languages. In this chapter we briefly cover the similarities and differences of these languages and introduce a machine translation methodology that exploits the similarities among these languages. This methodology relies on rule-based and statistical components and can be applicable for not only Turkic languages but also any other cognate language pairs.

Keywords

Machine Translation Evaluation Multi-word Expressions (MWEs) Root Word Wordforms Direct Translation System 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Altıntaş K (2000) Turkish to Crimean-Tatar machine translation system. Master’s thesis, Bilkent University, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
  2. Altıntaş K, Güvenir HA (2003) Learning translation templates for closely related languages. In: Proceedings of knowledge-based intelligent information and engineering systems, Oxford, pp 756–762Google Scholar
  3. Bouamor H, Alshikhabobakr H, Mohit B, Oflazer K (2014) A human judgement corpus and a metric for Arabic MT evaluation. In: Proceedings of EMNLP, Doha, pp 207–213Google Scholar
  4. Corbi-Bellot AM, Forcada ML, Ortíz-Rojas S, Pérez-Ortiz JA, Ramírez-Sánchez G, Sánchez-Martínez F, Alegria I, Mayor A, Sarasola K (2005) An open-source shallow-transfer machine translation engine for the romance languages of Spain. In: Proceedings of EAMT, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  5. Dvořák B, Homola P, Kuboň V (2006) Exploiting similarity in the MT into a minority language. In: Proceedings of the workshop on minority languages: “strategies for developing machine translation for minority languages”, Genoa, pp 59–64Google Scholar
  6. El Kholy A, Habash N (2011) Automatic error analysis for morphologically rich languages. In: Proceedings of the MT summit, Xiamen, pp 225–232Google Scholar
  7. Fatullayev A, Shagavatov S (2008) Turkish-Azerbaijani translation module of Dilmanc MT system. In: Proceedings of the second international conference on problems of cybernetics and informatics, Baku, Azerbaijan, pp 150–153Google Scholar
  8. Garrido-Alenda A, Gilabert-Zarco P, Pérez-Ortiz JA, Pertusa-Ibáñez A, Ramírez-Sánchez G, Sánchez-Martínez F, Scalco MA, Forcada ML (2003) Shallow parsing for Portuguese-Spanish machine translation. In: Proceedings of the workshop on tagging and shallow processing of Portuguese, Lisbon, pp 135–144Google Scholar
  9. Hajič J (1987) RUSLAN - an MT system between closely related languages. In: Proceedings of EACL, Copenhagen, pp 113–117Google Scholar
  10. Hajič J, Hric J, Kuboň V (2000) Machine translation of very close languages. In: Proceedings of NAACL-ANLP, Seattle, WA, pp 7–12Google Scholar
  11. Hajič J, Homola P, Kuboň V (2003) A simple multilingual machine translation system. In: Proceedings of the MT summit, New Orleans, LAGoogle Scholar
  12. Hamzaoğlu İ (1993) Machine translation from Turkish to other Turkic languages and an implementation for the Azeri language. Master’s thesis, Boğaziçi University, IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  13. Homola P, Kuboň V (2008) Improving machine translation between closely related romance languages. In: Proceedings of EAMT, Hamburg, pp 72–77Google Scholar
  14. Karttunen L, Gaal T, Kempe A (1997) Xerox finite-state tool. Technical report, Xerox Research Centre Europe, MeylanGoogle Scholar
  15. Kos K, Bojar O (2009) Evaluation of machine translation metrics for Czech as the target language. Prague Bull Math Ling 92:135–148Google Scholar
  16. Nakov P, Tiedemann J (2012) Combining word-level and character-level models for machine translation between closely-related languages. In: Proceedings of ACL, Jeju, pp 301–305Google Scholar
  17. Oflazer K (1994) Two-level description of Turkish morphology. Lit Ling Comput 9(2):137–148Google Scholar
  18. Oflazer K, Çetinoğlu Ö, Say B (2004) Integrating morphology with multi-word expression processing in Turkish. In: Proceedings of the ACL workshop on multiword expressions: integrating processing, Barcelona, pp 64–71Google Scholar
  19. Oller CA, Forcada ML (2006) Open-source machine translation between small languages: Catalan and Aranese Occitan. In: Proceedings of the workshop on minority languages: “strategies for developing machine translation for minority languages”, Genoa, pp 51–54Google Scholar
  20. Salimzyanov I, Washington JN, Tyers FM (2013) A free/open-source Kazakh-Tatar machine translation system. In: Proceedings of the MT summit, Nice, pp 174–182Google Scholar
  21. Scannell KP (2006) Machine translation for closely related language pairs. In: Proceedings of the workshop on minority languages: “strategies for developing machine translation for minority languages”, Genoa, pp 103–109Google Scholar
  22. Tantuğ AC, Adalı E, Oflazer K (2007) A MT system from Turkmen to Turkish employing finite state and statistical methods. In: Proceedings of the MT summit, Copenhagen, pp 459–465Google Scholar
  23. Tantuğ AC, Oflazer K, Durgar-El Kahlout İ (2008) BLEU+: a tool for fine-grained BLEU computation. In: Proceedings of LREC, Marrakesh, pp 1493–1499Google Scholar
  24. Tiedemann J (2009) Character-based PSMT for closely related languages. In: Proceedings of EAMT, Barcelona, pp 12–19Google Scholar
  25. Tyers FM, Washington JN, Salimzyanov I, Batalov R (2012) A prototype machine translation system for Tatar and Bashkir based on free/open-source components. In: Proceedings of the workshop on language resources and technologies for Turkic languages, Istanbul, pp 11–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Istanbul Technical UniversityIstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations