Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law ((GSCL,volume 28))

Abstract

Legal protections against discrimination began to emerge in the post-World War II era in Canada, with specific legislative enactments prohibiting exclusions based on race, sex, national or ethnic origin and religion in employment, housing and access to public services. More expansive and comprehensive statutory protections were introduced in the 1960s and 1970s in provinces and territories across Canada and at the federal level. Constitutional protections for equality and non-discrimination were entrenched in the 1980s and the Supreme Court of Canada has repeatedly affirmed a substantive approach to equality in its constitutional rulings. In addition, Canada has ratified numerous international human rights conventions. Thus, the most pressing challenge today is ensuring a broad and robust interpretation of these legal protections, and securing their effective enforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 379.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. BCGSEU, [1999] 3 SCR 3 at para 41 [BCGSEU].

  2. 2.

    Tarnopolsky (1982), Sheppard (2010), Dominique Clément & Canadian Human Rights Commission (2012).

  3. 3.

    Dominique Clément & Canadian Human Rights Commission (2012). For a full enumeration of current protections, see Appendix.

  4. 4.

    Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Part I of the Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11 [Canadian Charter]; Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143, 56 DLR (4th) 1; Law v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1999] 1 SCR 497, 170 DLR (4th) 1; R. v. Kapp, 2008 SCC 41, [2008] 2 SCR 483.

  5. 5.

    See below, section 1.4.

  6. 6.

    For a recent decision affirming the importance of deference by courts to specialized human rights tribunals, see Mouvement laïque québécois v. Saguenay (City), [2015] 2 SCR 3, paras 37–44.

  7. 7.

    Eliadis (2014), pp. 26, 153.

  8. 8.

    Eliadis (2014), pp. 75–78, 51–52.

  9. 9.

    Eliadis (2014), p. 91; British Columbia, BC Human Rights Tribunal, online: < www.bchrt.bc.ca/>. Recently, British Columbia has announced its intention to re-establish a human rights commission: see A Human Rights Commission for the 21st Century: British Columbians Talk about Human Rights, https://engage.gov.bc.ca/app/uploads/sites/213/2017/12/HRC-Final-Report-accessible-PDF.pdf

  10. 10.

    For a review, see Pinto (2013); see also Flaherty (2013), p. 169.

  11. 11.

    Flaherty (2013), p. 181.

  12. 12.

    Eliadis (2014), p. 100.

  13. 13.

    Canada, Canadian Human Rights Commission, online: <www.chrc-ccdp.gc.ca>.

  14. 14.

    Brunelle (2015), p. 11; Quebec (Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse) v. Communauté urbaine de Montréal, 2004 SCC 30, para 13, [2004] 1 SCR 789.

  15. 15.

    Human Rights Act, SNu 2003, c 12, s 21 [Nunavut Human Rights Act].

  16. 16.

    On indirect or adverse effect discrimination, see: Ont. Human Rights Comm. v. Simpsons-Sears, [1985] 2 SCR 536, at para 18; Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143, 56 DLR (4th) 1, 165; On systemic discrimination, see CN v. Canada (Canadian Human Rights Commission), [1987] 1 SCR 1114 at 1138 [CN]; See also Sheppard, Inclusive Equality, supra, note 2 at 19.

  17. 17.

    Employment Equity Act, SC 1995, c 44 [Employment Equity Act]; For an overview of the Federal Contractors Program, see, Canada, Employment and Social Development Canada, “Federal Contractors Program”, (7 May 2013), online: <www.labour.gc.ca/eng/standards_equity/eq/emp/fcp/index.shtml> [Canada, Federal Contractors Program].

  18. 18.

    See, e.g. Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms, CQLR c C-12, arts 86-92 [Quebec Charter]; An Act Respecting Equal Access to Employment in Public Bodies, CQLR c A-2.01; Pay Equity Act, CQLR c E-12.001 [Quebec Pay Equity Act]; Pay Equity Act, RSO 1990, c P.7 [Ontario Pay Equity Act]; Pay Equity Act, CCSM c P13; Pay Equity Act, SNB 2009, c P-5.05; Pay Equity Act, RSNS 1989, c 337; Pay Equity Act, RSPEI 1988, c P-2.

  19. 19.

    See Ontarians with Disabilities Act, SO 2001, c 32 [Ontarians with Disabilities Act]; Vulnerable Persons Living with a Mental Disability Act, CCSM c V90; An Act to Secure Handicapped Persons in the Exercise of Their Rights with a View to Achieving Social, School and Workplace Integration, CQLR c E-20.1. See also, Sexual Violence and Harassment Action Plan Act (Supporting Survivors and Challenging Sexual Violence and Harassment), S.O. 2016 C.2 and the very recent Anti-Racism Act, S.O. 2017 C.15. See also, An Act to prevent and fight sexual violence in higher education institutions, S.Q. 2017, chapter 32.

  20. 20.

    See, e.g. Agócs (2014).

  21. 21.

    Employment Equity Act, supra note 17; Canada, Federal Contractors Program, supra note 17. Note that in 2013, the Federal Contractors Program limit was raised from $200,000 in annual federal grants or contracts to $1 million.

  22. 22.

    Canada and Abella (1984), p. v. (The terminology used in the report for Indigenous people was “native people” and the term for racialized communities was “visible minorities.”) [Abella Report].

  23. 23.

    Ibid at 9.

  24. 24.

    Ibid at 7 (She noted that the term affirmative action was often associated with quotas and its use might prompt “intellectual resistance and confusion”).

  25. 25.

    Employment Equity Act, supra note 17, s 5.

  26. 26.

    Ibid, Part II. (Monetary penalties for non-compliance are also included in the Act, see Part III.).

  27. 27.

    Coverage extends to about 13–14% of the Canadian workforce. See Evaluation Directorate Strategic Policy and Research Branch Human Resources and Skills Development Canada, Strategic Evaluation of the Employment Equity Programs, (Ottawa: HRSDC, November 2012) at 2–3; Population of the Federal Public Service data: https://www.canada.ca/en/treasury-board-secretariat/services/innovation/human-resources-statistics/population-federal-public-service.html.

  28. 28.

    See, e.g. in Quebec, An Act Respecting Equal Access to Employment in Public Bodies, supra note 18. See also, Bakan and Kobayashi (2000).

  29. 29.

    See Ontario Pay Equity Act, supra note 18 (first enacted in 1987); Quebec Pay Equity Act, supra note 18 (introduced in 1996). Of note is the absence of proactive pay equity legislation at the federal level: see Andrée Côté & Julie Lassonde, “Status report on pay equity in Canada” (2007) National Association of Women and the Law, Final Report of the Workshop on Pay Equity (Ottawa); House of Commons, Special Committee on Pay Equity, It’s Time to Act (June 2016) (Chair: Anita Vandenbeld).

  30. 30.

    Equal Pay Coalition, “Other Provinces”, online: <www.equalpaycoalition.org/history/other-provinces/>.

  31. 31.

    Mary Cornish and Jan Borowy, “Brief to the Parliamentary Special Committee on Pay Equity”, Ontario Equal Pay Coalition (May 2016) (noting some narrowing of the pay gap); Singh and Peng (2010), p. 570; Armstrong (2007), p. 11; England and Gad (2002), p. 281; See also, Fudge (2007), p. 235.

  32. 32.

    See United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Concluding Observations of the Sixth Periodic Report of Canada” (2015), at 2: online: http://tbinternet.ohchr.org/_layouts/treatybodyexternal/Download.aspx?symbolno=CCPR%2FC%2FCAN%2FCO%2F6&Lang=en.

  33. 33.

    Ontarians with Disabilities Act, supra note 19; Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, SO 2005, c 11; For an overview of the Ontario disability rights protections, see Mayo Moran, Legislative Review of Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act, 2014, online : <www.ontario.ca/document/legislative-review-accessibility-ontarians-disabilities-act>.

  34. 34.

    Supra, note 19. For an overview of the legislation, see online: https://www.labour.gov.on.ca/english/hs/pubs/wpvh/index.php.

  35. 35.

    See Bill 114, Anti-Racism Act, 2017 Explanatory Note: http://ontla.on.ca/web/bills/bills_detail.do?locale=en&Intranet=&BillID=4694.

  36. 36.

    Private Member’s Motion M-103, Federal House of Commons, Canada, 23 March 2017: http://www.ourcommons.ca/Parliamentarians/en/members/Iqra-Khalid(88849)/Motions?documentId=8661986%2520&sessionId=152.

  37. 37.

    Canadian Charter, supra note 4.

  38. 38.

    Canadian Bill of Rights, SC 1960, c 44.

  39. 39.

    Reference re Secession of Quebec, [1998] 2 SCR 217, 161 DLR (4th) 385 [Secession Reference]; Other constitutional protections extend rights to groups and communities, such as minority language groups (see Canadian Charter, §§ 16–23) and Aboriginal peoples (Constitution Act, 1982, being Schedule B to the Canada Act 1982 (UK), 1982, c 11, s 35 [Constitution Act 1982]); See Sheppard (2006a), p. 463.

  40. 40.

    See Canadian Charter, §§ 2(a), 15, 16–23, 27, 28; Constitution Act 1982, ibid, s 35.

  41. 41.

    Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143, 56 DLR (4th) 1; Law v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1999] 1 SCR 497, 170 DLR (4th) 1; R. v. Kapp, 2008 SCC 41, [2008] 2 SCR 483.

  42. 42.

    See Canadian Charter, s 15(2); R. v. Kapp, 2008 SCC 41, [2008] 2 SCR 483.

  43. 43.

    See Sharpe and Roach (2017), ch. 2. See also, R. v. Conway, 2010 SCC 22 at paras 20–22, [2010] 1 SCR 765 (“…the principles governing remedial jurisdiction under the Charter apply to both courts and administrative tribunals”.).

  44. 44.

    Administrative tribunals form an integral part of Canada’s dispute resolution system. These tribunals are less formal and do not form part of the court system, however their decisions may be reviewed in court. Administrative tribunals that address discrimination cases include human rights tribunals and labour arbitration boards. See Government of Canada, Department of Justice, “Courts and other Bodies under Federal Jurisdiction”, online: <www.canada.justice.gc.ca/eng/csj-sjc/ccs-ajc>.

  45. 45.

    Court Challenges Program, “About CCP”, online: <www.ccppcj.ca/en/about.php>.

  46. 46.

    Court Challenges Program, “Reinstatement News”, online: <www.ccppcj.ca/en/news/php>; To access the full report, see, House of Commons, Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights, Access to Justice Part 1: Court Challenges Program: Report of the Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights (September 2016) (Chair: Anthony Housefather).

  47. 47.

    See, e.g. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, 19 December 1966, 999 UNTS 171, s 26 (entered into force 23 March 1976, accession by Canada 19 May 1976); Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women, 18 December 1979, 1249 UNTS 13, Can TS 1982 No 31, 19 ILM 33 (entered into force 3 September 1981, ratification by Canada 10 December 1981); International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination, 7 March 1966, 660 UNTS 212 (entered into force 4 January 1969, ratified by Canada 13 November 1970); Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, 30 March 2007, 2515 UNTS 3 (entered into force 3 May 2008, accession by Canada 11 March 2010).

  48. 48.

    See Catherine Morris, Implementation of human rights treaties in Canada, Briefing Note, 1 March 2014, Lawyers’ Rights Watch Canada: online: <www.lrwc.org/implementation-of-human-rights-treaties-in-canada-briefing-note/>.

  49. 49.

    For an overview of the individual complaints mechanisms pursuant to international treaties, see UN, Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, “Human Rights Bodies - Complaint Procedures”, online: <www.ohchr.org/EN/HRBodies/TBPetitions/Pages/HRTBPetitions.aspx#individualcomm>; See also Canada (2002).

  50. 50.

    Sandra Lovelace v. Canada, Communication No. R.6/24, U.N. Doc. Supp. No. 40 (A/36/40) at 166 (1981).

  51. 51.

    Canada, Parliament of Canada, Genetic Discrimination and Canadian Law, by Julian Walker, (September 2014) online: <www.parl.gc.ca/Content/LOP/ResearchPublications/2014-90-e.html> [Walker].

  52. 52.

    Ibid, at 6.

  53. 53.

    See, e.g., XY v. Ministry of Government and Consumer Services [2012] HRTO 726 (CanLII); M.L. et Commission des droits de la personne (1998) CanLII 28 (QC TDP).

  54. 54.

    See, for e.g., Canadian Coalition for Genetic Fairness, online: <ccgf-cceg.ca/en/home/>. See, for e.g., An Act to amend the Canadian Human Rights Act and the Criminal Code, S.C., c. 13, (Royal assent, 19 June 2017), adding gender identity and gender expression as prohibited grounds of discrimination under the Canadian Human Rights Act.

  55. 55.

    See Iyer (1993), p. 179; Sheppard (2001a), p. 893; Réaume (2002), p. 113.

  56. 56.

    For a concise overview of Charter equality and antidiscrimination cases, see Mary C. Hurley, Charter Equality Rights: Interpretation of Section 15 in Supreme Court of Canada Decisions (2007), online: <www.parl.gc.ca/content/lop/researchpublications/bp402-e.htm>.

  57. 57.

    See Andrews, supra note 4.

  58. 58.

    Egan v. Canada, [1995] 2 SCR 513.

  59. 59.

    Miron v. Trudel, [1995] 2 SCR 418. Other analogous grounds that have been recognized include: “off reserve Aboriginality residence (Corbiere v. Canada (Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs), [1999] 2 SCR 203).

  60. 60.

    See Gosselin v. Québec (Attorney General), 2002 SCC 84, [2002] 4 SCR 429 [Gosselin]—but in Falkiner v. Ontario (Minister of Community and Social Services), 59 OR (3d) 481 the Court of Appeal of Ontario ruled that “receipt of social assistance” was an analogous ground.

  61. 61.

    See Kapp, supra note 4; Lovelace v. Ontario, 2000 SCC 37, [2000] 1 SCR 950; See Sheppard (1993) [Sheppard, Equity and Equality].

  62. 62.

    See Janzen v. Platy Enterprises Ltd., [1989] 1 SCR 1252 [Janzen].

  63. 63.

    See Quebec Charter, supra note 18. See also, Saskatchewan Human Rights Code, SS 1979, c S-24.1, §§ 4–8 [Saskatchewan Human Rights Code].

  64. 64.

    See Quebec Charter, supra note 18 which provides in art 18.2: “No one may dismiss, refuse to hire or otherwise penalize a person in his employment owing to the mere fact that he was convicted of a penal or criminal offence, if the offence was in no way connected with the employment or if the person has obtained a pardon for the offence.”

  65. 65.

    Human Rights Code, RSO 1990, c H.19, s 2 [Ontario Human Rights Code].

  66. 66.

    Quebec Charter, supra note 18, art 20.1 para 1.

  67. 67.

    Ibid, art 20.1 para 2.

  68. 68.

    Human Rights Code, RSBC 1996, c 210, ss 11, 13–14 [BC Human Rights Code].

  69. 69.

    See BCGSEU, supra note 1.

  70. 70.

    Ibid; see also Sheppard (2001b), p. 533; Lepofsky (1993), p. 1. For an explanation of “undue hardship”, see, Council of Canadians with Disabilities v. VIA Rail Canada Inc., 2007 SCC 15 at paras 122–123, [2007] 1 SCR 650. The principle of “undue hardship” imposes a duty to accommodate until the burden to accommodate becomes unreasonable.

  71. 71.

    See Canadian Charter, s 32; RWDSU v. Dolphin Delivery Ltd., [1986] 2 SCR 573 at paras 34, 39. The Canadian Charter does not apply to interactions between individuals.

  72. 72.

    See, e.g., Law v. Canada (Minister of Employment and Immigration), [1999] 1 SCR 497, 170 DLR (4th) 1; Gosselin, supra note 61; Eldridge v. British Columbia (Attorney General), [1997] 3 SCR 624 [Eldridge].

  73. 73.

    See, e.g. Vriend v. Alberta, [1998] 1 SCR 493 [Vriend]; Re Blainey and Ontario Hockey Association, 54 OR (2d) 513 [Blainey].

  74. 74.

    See Canadian Human Rights Act, RSC 1985, c H-6, s 53 [Canadian Human Rights Act]; Alberta Human Rights Act, RSA 2000, c A-25.5, s 32; BC Human Rights Code, supra note 67, s 37; Human Rights Code, CCSM c H175, s 43 [Manitoba Human Rights Code]; Human Rights Act, RSNB 2011, c 171, s 23(7) [NB Human Rights Act]; Human Rights Act, Human Rights Act, 2010, SNL 2010, c H-13.1, s 39 [NL Human Rights Act]; Human Rights Act, SNWT 2002, c 18, s 62 [NWT Human Rights Act]; Human Rights Act, RSNS 1989, c 214, s 34(8) [NS Human Rights Act]; Ontario Human Rights Code, supra note 63, §§ 45.2 and 45.3; Quebec Charter, supra note 18, art 49; Human Rights Act, RSY 2002, c 116, s 24 [Yukon Human Rights Act].

  75. 75.

    See, e.g. First Nations Child and Family Caring Society of Canada et al. v. Attorney General of Canada (for the Minister of Indian and Northern Affairs Canada), 2016 CHRT 2 at paras 474–484 [First Nations Caring Society].

  76. 76.

    See, e.g., Denise Seeley c La compagnie des chemins de fer nationaux du Canada, 2010 TCDP 23 [Seeley]; Whyte v. Canadian National Railway, 2010 CHRT 22 [Whyte].

  77. 77.

    Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse c Bathium Canada inc., 2015 QCTDP 13 [Bathium]; Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse c 9209-9829 Québec inc., 2015 QCTDP 1 [9209-9829 Québec inc].

  78. 78.

    Ibid.

  79. 79.

    Seeley, supra note 77; Whyte, supra note 77.

  80. 80.

    See, e.g. Pinto, supra note 10 at 71.

  81. 81.

    See, e.g. Canadian Human Rights Act, supra note 74, s 53(3) ($20,000).

  82. 82.

    See, e.g., “restore the Complainant’s pension benefits to the position they were in at the time of her layoff” (Grant v. Manitoba Telecom Services Inc., 2012 CHRT 20); “Ms. Nicolosi is to be placed at the top of the VGHC waiting list and offered the next two-bedroom unit that becomes available. The Board will consider Ms. Nicolosi’s application on the basis that the Membership Committee has recommended her and that all references have been successfully checked” (Nicolosi v. Victoria Gardens Housing Co-operative and another (No. 2), 2013 BCHRT 1).

  83. 83.

    Robichaud v. Canada (Treasury Board), [1987] 2 SCR 84 at para 15.

  84. 84.

    See CN, supra note 16 at 1142.

  85. 85.

    Commission des droits de la personne et des droits de la jeunesse c Gaz métropolitain inc., 2008 QCTDP 24 (confirmed by the QCCA) [Gaz métropolitain]; National Capital Alliance on Race Relations v. Canada (Department of Health & Welfare), 1997 CanLII 1433 (CHRT) [NCARR]; Action Travail des Femmes v. Canadian National Railway, 1984 CanLII 9 (CHRT) (confirmed by [1987] 1 SCR 1114).

  86. 86.

    Gaz métropolitain, Ibid; NCARR, ibid.

  87. 87.

    See CN, supra note 16; Gaz métropolitain, supra note 86; NCARR, supra note 86.

  88. 88.

    Newfoundland and N.A.P.E., Re, 2004 SCR 3; Public Service Alliance of Canada v. Canada (Treasury Board), 1991 CanLII 387 (CHRT).

  89. 89.

    Commission des droits de la personne du Québec c Commission scolaire régionale Chauveau, 1993 CanLII 7 (QCTDP); Gaz métropolitain, supra note 86.

  90. 90.

    CN, supra note 16 at 1145.

  91. 91.

    See Moore v. British Columbia (Education), [2012] 3 SCR 360 [Moore]. While the Supreme Court of Canada noted at para 55 that the remedial order of an administrative tribunal should only be overturned if “patently unreasonable,” it found at para 57 that the systemic remedies were not warranted. See also, Vizkelety (2015), p. 43. See also, Brodsky et al. (2017), p. 1.

  92. 92.

    See Canadian Charter, s. 24(1); See Nelles v. Ontario, [1989] 2 SCR 170; Little Sisters Book and Art Emporium v. Canada (Minister of Justice), [2000] 2 SCR 1120; For an overview of Charter remedies, see Roach (2013), p. 473.

  93. 93.

    See Constitution Act 1982, s. 52(1).

  94. 94.

    See Secession Reference, supra note 40 at para 80; See generally, paras 79–82.

  95. 95.

    See, e.g., Centre de Recherche-Action sur les Relations Raciales, online: <www.crarr.org>; Canadian Civil Liberties Association, online: <https://ccla.org/>; Egale Canada Human Rights Trust, online: <http://egale.ca/>.

  96. 96.

    See Sheppard, Inclusive Equality, supra note 2.

  97. 97.

    Canadian Charter, s. 15(2); Quebec Charter, supra note 18, arts 86–92; An Act Respecting Equal Access to Employment in Public Bodies, supra note 18; Employment Equity Act, supra note 17; Canadian Human Rights Act, supra note 75, §§ 16–17; See Sheppard, Equity and Equality, supra note 62.

  98. 98.

    See, e.g., Women’s Legal Education and Action Fund, online: <http://www.leaf.ca/>; Canadian Doctors for Refugee Care, online: <www.doctorsforrefugeecare.ca>; Action travail des femmes, online: <www.atfquebec.ca>.

  99. 99.

    See, for e.g., same sex marriage opponents such as Real Women of Canada, online: <www.realwomenofcanada.ca>.

  100. 100.

    See Bilge and Roy (2010), p. 1.

  101. 101.

    Ibid; See also, Iyer (1993), p. 179; Ontario, Ontario Human Rights Commission, “An Intersectional Approach to Discrimination: Addressing Multiple Grounds in Human Rights Claims”, Policy and Education Branch (Toronto: Ontario Human Rights Commission, 9 October 2001).

  102. 102.

    Canada, Canadian Human Rights Commission, 2014 Annual Report, (Minister of Public Works and Government Services, 2015); Ontario, Social Justice Tribunals Ontario, 2013–2014 Annual Report; Quebec, Tribunal des droits de la personne, Bilan d’activités 2013–2014, (Mars 2015); British Columbia, BC Human Rights Tribunal, Annual Report 2014–2015, (June 2015); Alberta, Alberta Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 2013–2014; Manitoba, Manitoba Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 2013; New Brunswick, New Brunswick Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 2013–2014, (September 2014); Newfoundland and Labrador, Newfoundland Labrador Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 2014–2015; Prince Edward Island, Prince Edward Island Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 2013–2014; Saskatchewan, Saskatchewan Human Rights Commission, Annual Report 2013/2014.

  103. 103.

    Halpern v. Canada (AG), 65 OR (3d) 161; Vriend, supra note 74.

  104. 104.

    See Eldridge, supra note 73; Eaton v. Brant County Board of Education, [1997] 1 SCR 241; Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite-Bourgeoys, [2006] 1 SCR 256.

  105. 105.

    See, e.g., Rodgers et al. (2006), Faraday et al. (2006), Tanovich (2008), p. 655.

  106. 106.

    See, e.g., Canada, Canadian Human Rights Commission (2014).

  107. 107.

    See, e.g., Peel Law Association v. Pieters, 2013 ONCA 396 (Can LII), 116 OR (3d) 81; Shaw v. Phipps, 2012 ONCA 155 (Can LII); Radek v. Henderson Development (Canada) Ltd, 2005 BCHRT 302.

  108. 108.

    See, e.g. Eldridge, supra note 73; Moore, supra note 92.

  109. 109.

    Abella Report, supra note 23.

  110. 110.

    See, e.g. First Nations Caring Society, supra note 76.

  111. 111.

    Andrews v. Law Society of British Columbia, [1989] 1 SCR 143, 56 DLR (4th) 1 (importance of discrimination in section 15).

  112. 112.

    Sheppard (2012), pp. 1–2.

  113. 113.

    See, e.g., Ontario Human Rights Code, supra note 65, s 14(1); Quebec Charter, supra note 18, art 86.

  114. 114.

    See R. v. Kapp, 2008 SCC 41, [2008] 2 SCR 483.

  115. 115.

    Ibid. at para 40 (emphasis added).

  116. 116.

    See, e.g., Quebec Charter, supra note 18; Ontario Human Rights Code, supra note 66; See Appendix.

  117. 117.

    See Sheppard (2015), p. 225, online: <opo.iisj.net/index.php/osls/article/view/439/561>.

  118. 118.

    B v. Ontario (Human Rights Commission), [2002] 3 SCR 403 at para 44.

  119. 119.

    See Eliadis (2014).

  120. 120.

    See Agócs, supra, note 21.

  121. 121.

    Canada, Employment and Social Development Canada (2014).

  122. 122.

    Ibid. at 97.

  123. 123.

    Quebec, Quebec Human Rights and Youth Rights Commission, L’accès à l’égalité en emploi: rapport sectoriel sur les effectifs policiers de la Sûreté du Québec: Loi sur l’accès à l’égalité en emploi dans des organismes publics (2015).

  124. 124.

    See supra, s. 1.2.2.

  125. 125.

    See Sheppard (2006b), p. 251.

  126. 126.

    See, e.g. Mathieu Bock-Côté, “Abolir la Commission des droits”, Le Journal de Montréal, (1 August 2015), online : <www.journaldemontreal.com/2015/08/01/abolir-la-commission-des-droits>; Patrick Lagacé, “Jérémy Gabriel c. Mike Ward”, La Presse, (26 September 2015), online : <www.lapresse.ca/debats/chroniques/patrick-lagace/201509/23/01-4903096-jeremy-gabriel-c-mike-ward.php>; Chris Doucette, “White worker says Canada Revenue Agency discriminated against him”, Toronto Sun, (28 October 2015), online: <www.torontosun.com/2015/10/28/white-worker-sues-canadarevenue-agency-for-discrimination> (A white man took his unsuccessful human rights complaint to federal court claiming that the employment equity laws were subjecting him to discrimination); Catherine Girouard, “Cachez cette grossesse que je ne saurais voir…”, Journal Métro, (29 November 2015), online: <journalmetro.com/plus/carrieres/882353/cachez-cette-grossesse-que-je-ne-sauraisvoir/>.

  127. 127.

    See, e.g. Oreopoulos and Dechief (2011).

  128. 128.

    See Otobe (2011).

  129. 129.

    Sheppard (2013), pp. 107–110.

References

  • Agócs C (ed) (2014) Employment equity in Canada: the legacy of the Abella Report. University of Toronto Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong P (2007) Back to basics: seeking pay equity for women in Canada. Labour Ind 18(2):11 (A journal of the social and economic relations of work)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bakan A, Kobayashi A (2000) Employment equity policy in Canada: an interprovincial comparison/Politique d’équité en matière d’emploi au Canada: une comparaison interprovinciale. Status of Women Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Bilge S, Roy O (2010) La discrimination intersectionnelle: la naissance et le développement d’un concept et les paradoxes de sa mise en application en droit antidiscriminatoire. Can J Law Soc 25:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brodsky G, Day S, Kelly F (2017) The authority of human rights tribunals to grant systemic remedies. Can J Human Rights 6(1):1

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunelle C (2015) Chapitre VI - La mise en œuvre des droits et libertés en vertu de la Charte québécoise. In: Collection de droit 2015–2016. Y. Blais, Cowansville, p 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Abella RS (1984) Report of the commission on equality in employment. Minister of Supply and Services Canada, Ottawa, p v

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada (2002) Canada and the optional protocol to the convention to the convention on the elimination of all forms of discrimination against women: an overview. Status of Women, Canada. http://publications.gc.ca/collections/Collection/SW21-92-1-2002E.pdf

  • Canada, Canadian Human Rights Commission (2014) Special Report to Parliament on the Impact of Bill C-21. Minister of Public Works and Government Services, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Canada, Employment and Social Development Canada (2014) Employment equity act Annual Report 2014. Employment and Social Development Canada, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Clément D, Canadian Human Rights Commission (2012) The evolution of human rights in Canada. Canadian Human Rights Commission, Ottawa

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliadis P (2014) Speaking out on human rights: debating Canada’s human rights system. McGill-Queens University Press, Montreal, pp 26, 153

    Google Scholar 

  • England K, Gad G (2002) Social policy at work? Equality and equity in women’s paid employment in Canada. GeoJournal 56(4):281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faraday F, Denike M, Kate Stephenson M (eds) (2006) Making equality rights real: securing substantive equality under the charter. Irwin Law, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Flaherty M (2013) Ontario and the direct access model to human rights. In: Day S, Lamarche L, Norman K (eds) Arguments for human rights institutions in Canada, vol 22. Irwin Law, Toronto, p 169

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudge J (2007) Substantive equality, the Supreme Court of Canada, and the limits to redistribution. S Afr J Human Rights 23:235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iyer N (1993) Categorical denials: equality rights and the shaping of social identity. Queen’s Law J 19:179

    Google Scholar 

  • Lepofsky D (1993) The duty to accommodate: a purposive approach. Can Lab Law J 1:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreopoulos P, Dechief D (2011) Why do some employers prefer to interview Matthew, but not Samir? New evidence from Toronto, Montreal, and Vancouver. Metropolis British Columbia

    Google Scholar 

  • Otobe N (2011) International Labour Office & Employment Sector, Global economic crisis, gender and employment: the impact and policy response. ILO, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinto A (2013) Ontario & Ministry of the Attorney General, Report of the Ontario Human Rights Review 2012. Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Réaume DG (2002) Of pigeonholes and principles: a reconsideration of discrimination law. Osgoode Hall Law J 40:113

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach K (2013) Enforcement of the charter: subsections 24(1) and 52(1). SCLR (2d) 62:473

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodgers S, McIntyre S, Eberts M (eds) (2006) Strategizing systemic inequality claims: equality rights and the charter. LexisNexis, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe RJ, Roach K (2017) The Canadian charter of rights and freedoms, 6th edn. Irwin Law, Toronto, ch. 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (1993) Study paper on litigating the relationship between equity and equality. Ontario Law Reform Commission, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (2001a) Grounds of discrimination: towards an inclusive and contextual approach. Can Bar Rev 80:893

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (2001b) Of forest fires and systemic discrimination: a review of British Columbia (Public Service Employee Relations Commission) v. B.C.G.S.E.U. RD McGill 46:533

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (2006a) Constitutional recognition of diversity. Vermont Law Rev 30:463

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (2006b) Constitutional equality and shifting conceptions of the role of the state: obstacles and possibilities. In: Rodgers S, McIntyre S, Eberts M (eds) Strategizing systemic inequality claims: equality rights and the charter. LexisNexis, Toronto, p 251

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (2010) Inclusive equality – the relational dimensions of systemic discrimination in Canada. McGill-Queen’s University Press, Montreal

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (2012) Mapping antidiscrimination onto inequality at work: expanding the meaning of equality in international labour law. Int Labour Rev 151:1–2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (2013) Institutional inequality and the dynamics of courage. Windsor YB Access Just 31:107–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard C (2015) “Bread and Roses”: economic justice and constitutional rights. Onati Socio-Legal Ser 5(1):225

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh P, Peng P (2010) Canada’s bold experiment with pay equity. Gender Manage Int J 25(7):570

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanovich D (2008) The charter of whiteness: twenty-five years of maintaining racial injustice in the Canadian criminal justice system. SCLR (2d) 40:655

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarnopolsky WS (1982) Discrimination and the law in Canada. R. De Boo, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Vizkelety B (2015) Les développements jurisprudentiels relatifs à l’ “égalité réelle” en emploi: maintenant aux employeurs d’agir. In Barreau du Québec, Le tribunal des droits de la personne: 25 ans d’expérience en matière d’égalité. Éditions Yvon Blais, Montréal, p 43

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

I wish to thank Vanessa Clermont-Isabelle, Shereen Aly and Rebecca Jones for their excellent research assistance. I also wish to acknowledge support from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, through its funding of my research project on systemic discrimination.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Colleen Sheppard .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix

Appendix

Federal—Canadian Human Rights Act, RSC 1985, c H-6

Protected grounds

Race—National or ethnic origin—Colour—Religion—Age—Sex—Sexual orientation—Marital status—Family status—Disability—Conviction for an offence for which a pardon has been granted or in respect of which a record suspension has been ordered—Gender identity or expression

Protected areas

Denial of good, service, facility or accommodation (s.5)—Denial of commercial premises or residential accommodation (s.6)—Employment (s.7, 8, 9, 10)—Equal wages (s. 11)—Publication of discriminatory notices, etc. (s.12)—Harassment (s.14)

OntarioHuman Rights Code, RSO 1990, c H.19

Protected grounds

Age—Ancestry, colour, race—Citizenship—Ethnic origin—Place of origin—Creed—Disability—Family status—Marital status (including single status)—Gender identity, gender expression—Receipt of public assistance (in housing only)—Record of offences (in employment only)—Sex (including pregnancy and breastfeeding)—Sexual orientation

Protected areas

Services (s.1)—Accommodation (s.2)—Contracts (s.3)—Employment (s.5)—Vocational association (s.6)—Sexual harassment (s.7)

QuebecCharter of human rights and freedoms, CQLR c C-12

Protected grounds

Race—Colour—Sex—Pregnancy—Sexual orientation—Civil status—Age except as provided by law—Religion—Political convictions—Language—Ethnic or national origin—Social condition—A handicap or the use of any means to palliate a handicap

Protected areas

Harassment (s. 10.1)—Notice, symbol or sign (s. 11)—Juridical act (s.12, s.13)—Access to public space (s.15)—Employment (s.16, 18, 18.1, 18.2—criminal offence)—Discriminatory association (s.17)

British ColumbiaHuman Rights Code, RSBC 1996, c 210

Protected grounds

Race—Colour—Ancestry—Place of origin—Religion—Marital status—Family status (except in purchase of property)—Physical or mental disability—Sex—Sexual orientation—Age—Criminal conviction (only in employment and membership in a union or occupational association)—Political belief (only in employment, employment advertisements, and membership in a union or occupational association)—Source of income (only in tenancy)

Protected areas

Publication (s.7)—Accommodation, service and facility (s.8)—Purchase of property (s.9)—Tenancy premises (s.10)—Employment advertisements (s.11)—Wages (s.12)—Employment (s.13)—/unions and associations (s.14)

AlbertaAlberta Human Rights Act, RSA 2000, c A-25.5

Protected grounds

Race—Religious beliefs—Colour—Gender—Physical disability—Mental disability—Ancestry—Age (except in tenancy and goods, services, accommodation)—Place of origin—Place of birth—Marital status—Source of income—Family status—Sexual orientation

Protected areas

Publications, notices (s.3)—Goods, services, accommodation, facilities (s.4)—Tenancy (s.5)—Employment practices (s.7)—Applications and advertisements re employment (s.8)—Membership in trade union, etc. (s.9)

ManitobaThe Human Rights Code, CCSM c H175

Protected grounds

Ancestry, including colour and perceived race—Nationality or national origin—Ethnic background or origin—Religion or creed, or religious belief, religious association or religious activity—Age

Sex—Gender identity—Sexual orientation—Marital or family status—Source of income—Political belief, political association or political activity—Physical or mental disability—Social disadvantage

Protected areas

Service, accommodation, etc. (s.13)—Employment (s.14)—Contracts (s.15)—Rental of premises (s.16)—Purchase of real property (s.17)—Signs and statements (s.18)—Discriminatory Harassment (s.19)—Discriminatory reprisals (s.20)

SaskatchewanThe Saskatchewan Human Rights Code, SS 1979, c S-24.1

Protected grounds

Sexual orientation—Ancestry—Colour—Race—Nationality—Place of origin—Receipt of public assistance—Disability—Age—Religion—Family status—Marital status—Sex—Gender identity

Protected areas

Occupation (s.9)—Purchase of property (s.10)—Occupancy of commercial unit or housing accommodation (s.11)—Places to which public admitted (s.12)—Education (s.13)—Publications (s.14)—Contracts (s.15)—Employment (s.16–19)

New BrunswickHuman Rights Act, RSNB 2011, c 171

Protected grounds

Race—Colour—National origin—Place of origin—Ancestry—Religion—Age—Marital status

Sex—Sexual orientation—Physical or mental disability—Social condition—Political belief or activity

Protected areas

Employment (s.4)—Housing and sale of property (s.5)—Accommodation and services (s.6)—Notices or signs (s.7)—Professional, business or trade association (s.8)—Sexual harassment (s.10)

Nova ScotiaHuman Rights Act, RSNS 1989, c 214

Protected grounds

Age—Race—Colour—Religion—Creed—Ethnic, national or aboriginal origin—Sex—Sexual orientation—Disability—Family status—Marital status—Source of income—Irrational fear of contracting an illness or disease—Association with protected groups or individuals—Political belief, affiliation or activity—Gender Identity/Gender Expression

Protected areas

(s.5(1)) Provision of or access to services or facilities—Accommodation—Purchase or sale of property—Employment—Volunteer public service—Publication, broadcast or advertisement—Membership in a professional association or organization—Harassment (s.5(2) and (3))—Publication (s.7)—Employment (s.8)

Prince Edward IslandHuman Rights Act, RSPEI 1988, c H-12

Protected grounds

Age—Colour, Race, Ethnic or National Origin—Criminal Conviction—Family or Marital Status—Gender Identity—Political Belief—Sexual Orientation—Association (with an individual or group of individuals who is protected under the Act)—Creed or Religion—Disability—Gender Expression—Sex or Gender—Source of Income

Protected areas

Accommodation (s.2)—Occupancy rights (s.3)—Property sales (s.4)—Employment (s.6, 7)—Association (s.8, 9)—Public functions and organizations (s.10)—Advertising (s.12)

NewfoundlandHuman Rights Act, 2010, SNL 2010, c H-13.1

Protected grounds

Race—Colour—Nationality—Ethnic origin—Social origin—Religious creed—Religion—Age—Disability—Disfigurement—Sex—Sexual orientation—Marital status—Family status—Source of income—Political opinion

Protected areas

Goods, services, accommodation, and facilities (s.11)—Right to occupy commercial and dwelling units (s.12)—Harassment of occupant prohibited (s.13)—Employment (s.14, 15)—Harassment (s.17,18)—Publications (s. 19)—Contracts (s.21)

Northwest TerritoriesHuman Rights Act, SNWT 2002, c 18

Protected grounds

Race, Colour, Ancestry, Place of Origin, Ethnic Origin, Nationality—Religion or Creed—Age –Disability—Sex—Sexual orientation—Gender identity—Marital Status—Family Status—Family affiliation—Political belief, political association—Social condition—Pardoned criminal conviction or record suspension

Protected areas

Employment (s.7, 9)—Organizations (s.10)—Goods, services, accommodation and facilities (s.11)—Tenancy (s.12)—Publications (s.13)—Harassment (s.14)

YukonHuman Rights Act, RSY 2002, c 116

Protected grounds

Ancestry, including colour and race—National origin—Ethnic or linguistic background/origin—Religion or creed—Age—Sex—Sexual orientation—Disability—Criminal charges or criminal record

Political belief, association, or activity—Marital or family status—Source of income—Actual or presumed association with any of the grounds listed above

Protected areas

Goods and services (s.9a)—Employment, and any aspect of employment (s.9b,c)—Housing, leasing or renting (s. 9d)—Public Contracts (s.9e)—Harassment (s.14)

NunavutHuman Rights Act, Snu 2003, c 12

Protected grounds

Race—Colour—Ancestry—Ethnic origin—Citizenship—Place of origin—Religion—Creed—Age—Disability—Sex—Sexual orientation—Marital and family status—Pregnancy—Lawful source of income—A conviction for which a pardon has been granted

Protected areas

Harassment (s.7(6))—Employment (s.9)—Organizations and associations (s.11)—Goods, services, facilities, contracts (s.12)—Tenancy (s.13)—Publications (s.14)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sheppard, C. (2018). Canada. In: Mercat-Bruns, M., Oppenheimer, D., Sartorius, C. (eds) Comparative Perspectives on the Enforcement and Effectiveness of Antidiscrimination Law. Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, vol 28. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90068-1_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90068-1_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-90067-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-90068-1

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics