Advertisement

Massively Multi-user Online Social Virtual Reality Systems: Ethical Issues and Risks for Long-Term Use

  • Jolanda TrompEmail author
  • Chung Le
  • Bao Le
  • Dac-Nhuong Le
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter covers the convergence of Social Media Networks and Virtual Reality Systems, labeled as Social Virtual Reality. It reviews the evolution of the World Wide Web from a single user, static experience into the futuristic 3D multi user interactive experience. This is followed by a review of bulk data collection in Virtual Reality, and the ethical risks and threats to privacy that this could create for Social Virtual Reality users. The chapter ends with recommendations to mitigate the ethical risks and threats to privacy for adult VR users, parents of VR users, psychologists, VR software and hardware manufacturers, governments and other regulatory institutions and VR researchers.

Keywords

Social VR Web VR MMOGs Metaverse Web 5.0 

References

  1. 1.
    Ahn, S. J., Bailenson, J., & Park, D. (2014). Short- and long-term effects of embodied experiences in immersive virtual environments on environmental locus of control and behavior. Computers in Human Behavior, 39, 235–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2014.07.025.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blascovich, J., & Bailenson, J. (2011). Infinite reality, the hidden blueprint of our virtual lives. USA: HarperCollins.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Choudhury, N. (2014). World wide web and its journey from web 1.0 to. web 4.0. International Journal of Computer Science and Information Technologies (IJCSIT), 5(6), 8096–8100.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Madary, M., & Metzinger, T. K. (2016). Real virtuality: A code of ethical conduct recommendations for good scientific practice and the consumers of VR-technology. Journal Frontiers in Robotics and AI, 3, 00.  https://doi.org/10.3389/frobt.2016.00003. ISSN 2296-9144.
  5. 5.
    O’Brolchain, F., Jacquemard, T., Monaghan, D., et al. (2016). The convergence of virtual reality and social networks: Threats to privacy and autonomy. Science and Engineering Ethics, 22(1), 00.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9621-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sago, & Brad, (2015). A comparison of user perceptions and frequency of use of social media to use of social media. International Journal of Management and Marketing Research, 8(1), 15–29. SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2655859.
  7. 7.
    Scoble, R., & Israel, S. (2017). The fourth transformation: How augmented reality and artificial intelligence change everything. USA: Patrick Brewster Press.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Smart, J.M., Cascio, J., & Paffendorf, J. (2007). Metaverse Roadmap Overview, 2007. Accelerated Studies Foundation. http://metaverseroadmap.org/resources.html#inputs
  9. 9.
    Spagnolli, A., Conti, M., Guerra, G., Freeman, J., Kirsh, D., & van Wynsberghe, A. (2017). Adapting the system to users based on implicit data: Ethical risks and possible solutions. In L. Gamberini, A. Spagnolli, G. Jacucci, B. Blankertz, & J. Freeman (Eds.), Symbiotic Interaction. Symbiotic 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science (vol. 9961). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Steinicke, F. (2016). Being really virtual : Immersive natives and the future of virtual reality. Switzerland: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Stephenson, N. (1992). Snowcrash. Bantam Books.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thaler, R., & Sunstein, (2009). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. USA: Penguin Group.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tromp, J. G. (1995). Presence, telepresence and immersion: The cognitive factors of embodiment and interaction in virtual environments. Proceedings of FIVE’95 Conference, Frameworks for Immersive Virtual Environments (pp. 18–19). UK.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tromp, J. G. (2001). Systematic usability design for collaborative virtual environments, Ph.D. thesis, University of, UK: Nottingham.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tromp, J. G., Steed, A., & Wilson, J. (2003). Systematic usability evaluation and design issues for collaborative virtual environments. Presence Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 12(3), 241–267.  https://doi.org/10.1162/105474603765879512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yee, N., & Bailenson, J. (2007). The proteus effect: the effect of transformed self-representation on behavior. Human Communication Research, 33, 271–290.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00299.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jolanda Tromp
    • 1
    Email author
  • Chung Le
    • 1
  • Bao Le
    • 1
  • Dac-Nhuong Le
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Visualization and SimulationDuy Tan UniversityDa NangVietnam
  2. 2.Faculty of Information TechnologyHaiphong UniversityHaiphongVietnam

Personalised recommendations