Advertisement

Postsocialism and the Afterlives of Revolution: Impossible Spaces of Dissent

  • Neda AtanasoskiEmail author
  • Erin McElroy
Chapter

Abstract

McElroy and Atanasoski address postsocialism as an emerging theoretical concept that allows for a novel perspective on the contestations of liberalism and fascism. Focusing on the politics of protest and public space in Romania and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, they assess how and why the Cold War is being newly interpellated in the contemporary moment. Romania’s “Light Revolution” and Macedonia’s “Colorful Revolution” protests provide apt case studies for how postsocialist liberalism takes shape against the backdrop of Cold War 2.0, in which socialism and fascism are conflated as illiberal aberrations to be overcome. Rather than fall into stereotypical invocations of Eastern Europe as a space from which to theorize totalitarianism, Atanasoski and McElroy ask what Eastern European postsocialist politics can teach us about the perils of liberalism. They conclude that the reorganization of public space undergirds the conditions of forgetting that enable postsocialist disaster capitalism to flourish, which, as they contend, speaks not just about Eastern European specificity, but more broadly about the contradictions of Euro-American liberalism made apparent in its recent crises (from Brexit to the election of Donald Trump).

Keywords

Postsocialism Eastern Europe Totalitarianism Liberalism Nostalgia Capitalism Fascism Public space Romania Macedonia Light revolution Colorful revolution 

Works Cited

  1. Anonymous. “The ‘Light Revolution’ in Romania: When Toppling the Government Isn’t Enough.” CrimethInk, March 9, 2017. https://crimethinc.com/2017/03/09/the-light-revolution-in-romania-when-toppling-the-government-isnt-enough.
  2. Atanasoski, Neda, and Kalindi Vora. “Postsocialist Politics and the Ends of Revolution.” Social Identities, 2017, pp. 1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504630.2017.1321712.
  3. Chari, Sharad, and Verdery, Katherine. “Thinking Between the Posts: Postcolonialism, Postsocialism, and Ethnography After the Cold War.” Comparative Studies in Society and History, vol. 51, no. 1, 2009, pp. 6–34.Google Scholar
  4. Chelcea, Liviu. “The ‘Housing Question’ and the State‐Socialist Answer: City, Class and State Remaking in 1950s Bucharest.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, vol. 36, no. 2, 2012, pp. 281–296.Google Scholar
  5. Chelcea, Liviu, and Oana Druţǎ. “Zombie Socialism and the Rise of Neoliberalism in Post-Socialist Central and Eastern Europe.” Eurasian Geography and Economics, vol. 57, no. 4–5, 2016, pp. 521–544.Google Scholar
  6. Clapp, Alexander. “Romania Redivivus.” New Left Review, 2017. https://newleftreview.org/II/108/alexander-clapp-romania-redivivus.
  7. Crevar, Alex. “Beyond Kitsch in Skopje.” New York Times, October 5, 2016.Google Scholar
  8. Cucu, Sorin. Paper Presented at ASA/P Meeting, March 2017.Google Scholar
  9. Dunn, Elizabeth. “Anthropology Matters: Engaging with the Work of Katherine Verdery.” American Anthropological Association Conference, Washington, DC, December 2, 2017.Google Scholar
  10. Dzenovska, Dace, and Larisa Kurtovic. “The Future of Postsocialist Critique.” Presented at Soyuz Conference, Indiana University Bloomington, March 2017.Google Scholar
  11. Eurostat. “Material and Social Deprivation,” 2017. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/-/DDN-20171212-1.
  12. Florea, Ioana. “The Ups and Downs of a Symbolic City: The Architectural Heritage Protection Movement in Bucharest.” Urban Grassroots Movements in Central and Eastern Europe, edited by Kerstin Jacobsson, pp. 55–78. London: Routledge, 2015.Google Scholar
  13. Fukuyama, Francis. The End of History and the Last Man. New York: Simon and Schuster, 2006.Google Scholar
  14. Ghodsee, Kristen. Red Hangover: Legacies of Twentieth-Century Communism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2016.Google Scholar
  15. Gillet, Kit. “How Skopje Became Europe’s New Capital of Kitsch.” Guardian, April 11, 2015.Google Scholar
  16. Godzich, Wlad. “Sekend-Hend Europe.” Boundary 2, vol. 41, no. 1, 2014, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
  17. Graan, Andrew. “Counterfeiting the Nation: Skopje 2014 and the Politics of Nation Branding in Macedonia.” Cultural Anthropology, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 161–179.Google Scholar
  18. Jordanovska, Meri. “True Cost of Skopje 2014 Revealed.” Balkan Insight, July 27, 2015.Google Scholar
  19. Kelley, Robin D. G. “Trump Says Go Back, We Say Fight Back.” Boston Review, November 15, 2016. http://bostonreview.net/forum/after-trump/robin-d-g-kelley-trump-says-go-back-we-say-fight-back.
  20. Lancione, Michele. “Revitalising the Uncanny: Challenging Inertia in the Struggle Against Forced Evictions.” Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, vol. 35, no. 6, 2017, pp. 1012–1032.Google Scholar
  21. Lazarus, Neil. “Spectres Haunting: Postcommunism and Postcolonialism.” Journal of Postcolonial Writing, vol. 48, no. 2, pp. 117–129.Google Scholar
  22. Lowe, Lisa. The Intimacies of Four Continents. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2015.Google Scholar
  23. Lozanovska, Mirjana. “Kenzo Tange’s Forgotten Master Plan for the Reconstruction of Skopje.” The Journal for the Society of Architectural Historians, Australia and New Zealand, vol. 22, no. 2, 2012, pp. 140–163.Google Scholar
  24. Mattioli, Fabio. “Conflicting Conviviality: Ethnic Forms of Resistance to Border-Making at the Bottom of the US Embassy of Skopje, Macedonia.” Journal of Borderlands Studies, vol. 27, no. 2, 2012, pp. 185–198.Google Scholar
  25. Mattioli, Fabio. “Unchanging Boundaries: The Reconstruction of Skopje and the Politics of Heritage.” International Journal of Heritage Studies, vol. 20, no. 6, 2014, pp. 599–615.Google Scholar
  26. Moore, Phil. “Macedonia’s Colorful Revolution.” PRI, August 1, 2016. https://www.pri.org/stories/2016-08-01/macedonias-colorful-revolution.
  27. Petrovszky, Konrad, and Ovidiu Țichindeleanu, Romanian Revolution Televised: Contributions to the Cultural History of Media. Idea Design and Print, 2011.Google Scholar
  28. Poenaru, Florin. “What Is at Stake in the Romanian Protests?” LeftEast, February 7, 2017. http://www.criticatac.ro/lefteast/romanian-protests/.
  29. Pusca, Anca. Post-Communist Aesthetics: Revolutions, Capitalism, Violence. London: Routledge, 2016.Google Scholar
  30. Scott, David. Omens of Adversity: Tragedy, Time, Memory, Justice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
  31. Singh, Nikhil Pal. “Cold War.” Social Text, vol. 27, no. 3, 2009, pp. 67–70.Google Scholar
  32. Țichindeleanu, Ovidiu. 2017. “Romania’s Protests: From Social Justice to Class Politics.” CriticAtac, February 27, 2017. http://www.criticatac.ro/romanias-protests-from-social-justice-to-class-politics/.
  33. Verdery, Katherine. The Vanishing Hectare: Property and Value in Postsocialist Transylvania. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
  34. Verdery, Katherine. The Political Lives of Dead Bodies: Reburial and Postsocialist Change. New York: Columbia University Press, 2005.Google Scholar
  35. Vincze, Eniko. “Urban Landfill, Economic Restructuring and Environmental Racism.” Philobiblon, vol. 18, no. 2, 2013, pp. 389–405.Google Scholar
  36. Wark, McKenzie. Virtual Geography: Living with Global Media Events. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994.Google Scholar
  37. Williams, Randall. The Divided World: Human Rights and Its Violence. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.Google Scholar
  38. Yurchak, Alexei. “Trump, Monstration and the Limits of Liberalism.” Paper Presented at the American Ethnological Society Annual Meeting, Stanford University, March 2017.Google Scholar
  39. Zhang, Xudong. Postsocialism and Cultural Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of CaliforniaSanta CruzUSA

Personalised recommendations