Abstract
This chapter sets out the theoretical framework for the study of the prime minister’s political leadership in European monetary policy. Firstly, different approaches to the study of political leadership are introduced. Moreover, concepts of the British political system are identified. They include the classical Westminster approach and Patrick Dunleavy’s and Roderick Rhodes’ core executive concept. Additionally, concepts to assess the prime minister’s political leadership in government decision-making are considered. These include Martin J. Smith’s model of prime ministerial power and Richard Heffernan’s thesis of prime ministerial predominance. On the basis of these, a modified model of prime ministerial power is developed. It is used to identify whether the four prime minister’s leadership analysed in this study was predominant or collective in European monetary policy.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
According to Helms (2000: 416) the de facto direct elections of the head of state and a monocratic structure of the executive grant the president larger room for manoeuvre than heads of government/state in other political systems.
- 2.
According to this approach institutions are not only formal constitutional rules but also social norms, which are accepted by actors in a political system (Scharpf 2000: 77).
- 3.
Despite changes to its political system in the past years, Lijphart (2012: 20) argues that the UK can still be seen as a very fitting example of a majoritarian democratic system.
- 4.
The concept is contested, e.g. Heffernan (2005b) compares the offices of UK prime minister and US president and concludes that the latter has to govern with more institutional constraints than the former.
- 5.
- 6.
This analysis will focus on the parliamentary party in the House of Commons. The House of Lords is part of the legislative process, but its powers are limited. It can delay a bill’s passage for a year. Yet with few exceptions, the Commons can then reintroduce and pass it in the next session without the Lords’ consent (Kelly and Maer 2016).
References
Bennister, M. (2007). Tony Blair and John Howard: Comparative predominance and ‘institution stretch’ in the UK and Australia. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 9(3), 327–345.
Bennister, M. (2008). Blair and Howard: Predominant prime ministers compared. Parliamentary Affairs, 61(2), 334–355.
Burch, M. (1995). Prime minister and Whitehall. In D. Shell & R. Hodder-Williams (Eds.), Churchill to Major: The British prime ministership since 1945 (pp. 104–136). Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.
Crossmann, R. H. S. (1963). Introduction. In W. Bagehot (Ed.), The English constitution (2nd ed., pp. 1–57). London: Collins/Fontana Library.
Dunleavy, P., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1990). Core executive studies in Britain. Public Administration, 68(1), 3–28.
Elgie, R. (1995). Political leadership in liberal democracies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Fliegauf, M. T., Kießling, A., & Novy, L. (2008). Leader und Follower – Grundzüge eines inter-personalen Ansatzes zur Analyse politischer Führungsleistung. Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 18(4), 399–421.
Foley, M. (1993). The rise of the British presidency. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Foley, M. (2000). The British presidency: Tony Blair and the politics of public leadership. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Gamble, A. (1990). Theories of British politics. Political Studies, 38(3), 404–420.
Hay, C. (1995). Structure and agency. In D. Marsh & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 189–206). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Heffernan, R. (2003). Prime ministerial predominance? Core executive politics in the UK. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 5(3), 347–372.
Heffernan, R. (2005a). Exploring (and explaining) the British prime minister. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 7(4), 605–620.
Heffernan, R. (2005b). Why the prime minister cannot be a president: Comparing institutional imperatives in Britain and America. Parliamentary Affairs, 58(1), 53–70.
Heffernan, R. (2006). The prime minister and the news media: Political communication as a leadership resource. Parliamentary Affairs, 59(4), 582–598.
Helms, L. (2000). “Politische Führung” als politikwissenschaftliches Problem. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 41(3), 411–434.
Helms, L. (2005a). Politische Führung. In D. Nohlen & R.-O. Schultze (Eds.), Lexikon der Politikwissenschaft, Part 2 (3rd ed., pp. 737–738). Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.
Helms, L. (2005b). Presidents, prime ministers and chancellors: Executive leadership in western democracies. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Helms, L. (2005c). Regierungsorganisation und politische Führung in Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Hennessy, P. (2001). The prime minister: The office and its holders since 1945 (2nd ed.). London: Penguin.
Hübner, E., & Münch, U. (1999). Das Politische System Großbritanniens: Eine Einführung (2nd ed.). Munich: Verlag C.H. Beck.
Kaiser, A. (2001). Die politische Theorie des Neo-Institutionalismus: James March und Johan Olsen. In A. Brodocz & G. S. Schaal (Eds.), Politische Theorien der Gegenwart II: Eine Einführung (pp. 253–282). Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Kavanagh, D., & Seldon, A. (2000). The powers behind the prime minister: The hidden influence of Number Ten (2nd ed.). London: HarperCollins.
Kelly, R., & Maer, L. (2016, February 25). The Parliament Acts, House of Commons Library Briefing Paper No. 00675.
Lijphart, A. (2012). Patterns of democracy: Government forms and performance in thirty-six countries (2nd ed.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Marsh, D., Richards, D., & Smith, M. J. (2003). Unequal plurality: Towards an asymmetric model of British politics. Government and Opposition, 38(3), 306–332.
Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Der Ansatz des akteurszentrierten Institutionalismus. In R. Mayntz & F. W. Scharpf (Eds.), Gesellschaftliche Selbstregulierung und politische Steuerung. Campus: Frankfurt.
Mughan, A. (2000). Media and the presidentialization of parliamentary elections. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Norton, P. (2003). National parliaments and the European Union. Managerial Law, 45(5/6), 5–25.
Poguntke, T., & Webb, P. (Eds.). (2005). The presidentialization of politics: A comparative study of modern democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Putnam, R. D. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two-level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1995). From prime ministerial power to core executive. In R. A. W. Rhodes & P. Dunleavy (Eds.), Prime minister, cabinet and core executive (pp. 11–37). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Riddell, P. (2004). Prime ministers and parliament. Parliamentary Affairs, 57(4), 814–829.
Scharpf, F. W. (2000). Interaktionsformen: Akteurszentrierter Institutionalismus in der Politikforschung. Opladen: Leske + Budrich.
Seldon, A. (1994). Policy making and cabinet. In D. Kavanagh & A. Seldon (Eds.), The Major effect (pp. 154–166). London: Macmillan.
Seymour-Ure, C. (2003). Prime ministers and the media: Issues of power and control. Oxford: Blackwell.
Smith, M. J. (1994). The core executive and the resignation of Mrs Thatcher. Public Administration, 72(3), 341–363.
Smith, M. J. (1995). Interpreting the rise and fall of Margaret Thatcher: Power dependence and the core executive. In R. A. W. Rhodes & P. Dunleavy (Eds.), Prime minister, cabinet and core executive (pp. 108–124). Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Smith, M. J. (1998). Reconceptualizing the British state: Theoretical and empirical challenges to central government. Public Administration, 76(1), 45–72.
Smith, M. J. (1999). The core executive in Britain. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bujard, B. (2019). Theoretical Framework: Prime Ministerial Political Leadership in the British Political System. In: The British Prime Minister in the Core Executive. Contributions to Political Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89953-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89953-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89952-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89953-4
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)