A Learning Performance Perspective on Representational Competence in Elementary Science Education

  • Laura ZangoriEmail author
Part of the Models and Modeling in Science Education book series (MMSE, volume 11)


To begin to align curriculum and instruction with children’s cognitive abilities, the field requires a theoretical lens to examine how students engage in scientific reasoning for knowledge-building. This chapter employs a learning performance (LP) perspective as a lens to examine what it means for early learners to develop representational competence over a single “big science idea” within a single grade band in the elementary classroom. This lens includes: (a) identifying the knowledge elementary students bring with them into the lesson and the ways in which they build upon this knowledge through the practices of modeling, and (b) how elementary students scientifically reason about phenomena when engaging with the practice of modeling. The chapter will first describe the characteristics and design of learning performances, and the ways that this perspective is useful for describing development of both conceptual understanding and sophisticated reasoning about scientific phenomena. Next, it will examine how elementary students progress through a learning performance and how their progressions anchor learning progressions to productively inform instruction and assessment.



This paper is based on the author’s doctoral dissertation. This research was supported in part by the Paul and Edith Babson Fellowship and the Warren and Edith Day Doctoral Dissertation Travel Award, University of Nebraska-Lincoln. I appreciate the interest and participation of the students and teachers who made this work possible. I also thank Patricia Friedrichsen for insightful comments on an earlier draft of the manuscript.


  1. Alonzo, A. C., & Steedle, J. T. (2009). Developing and assessing a force and motion learning progression. Science Education, 93(3), 389–421. Scholar
  2. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. American Association for the Advancement of Science. (2007). Atlas for scientific literacy. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  4. Clement, J. (2000). Model based learning as a key research area for science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(9), 1041–1053. Scholar
  5. Duncan, R. G., Rogat, A. D., & Yarden, A. (2009). A learning progression for deepening students understandings of modern genetics across the 5th-10th grades. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 655–674. Scholar
  6. Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Schouse, A. W. (2007). Taking science to school: Learning and teaching science in grades K-8. Washington, D.C: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  7. Forbes, C. T., Zangori, L., & Schwarz, C. V. (2015). Empirical validation of integrated learning performances for hydrologic phenomena: 3rd-grade students’ model-driven explanation-construction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52(7), 895–921. Scholar
  8. Full Option Science Systems. (2009). Teacher guide: Structures of life. Berkeley: Delta Education.Google Scholar
  9. Gilbert, J. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130. Scholar
  10. Gilbert, J., Boulter, C., & Rutherford, M. (2000). Explanations with models in science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 193–208). Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gunckel, K. L., Covitt, B. A., Salinas, I., & Anderson, C. W. (2012). A learning progression for water in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(9), 843–868. Scholar
  12. Halloun, I. A. (2007). Mediated modeling in science education. Science and Education, 16(7–8), 653–697. Scholar
  13. Justi, R. S., & Gilbert, J. K. (2002). Modelling, teachers’ views on the nature of modelling, and implications for the education of modellers. International Journal of Science Education, 24(4), 369–387. Scholar
  14. Krajcik, J., McNeill, K. L., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Learning-goals-driven design model: Developing curriculum materials that align with national standards and incorporate project-based pedagogy. Science Education, 92(1), 1–32. Scholar
  15. Lead States, N. G. S. S. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by States. Washington, DC: Electronic Book, National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  16. Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2010). What kind of explanation is a model? In M. K. Stein & L. Kucan (Eds.), Instructional explanations in the disciplines (pp. 9–22). Boston: Springer US.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Louca, L. T., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2012). Modeling-based learning in science education: Cognitive, metacognitive, social, material and epistemological contributions. Educational Review, 64(4), 471–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Manz, E. (2012). Understanding the codevelopment of modeling practice and ecological knowledge. Science Education, 96(6), 1071–1105. Scholar
  19. Metz, K. E. (2006). The knowledge building enterprises in science and elementary school science classrooms. In L. B. Flick & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Scientific inquiry and nature of science (pp. 105–130). Netherlands: Springer.Google Scholar
  20. Metz, K. E. (2008). Narrowing the gulf between the practices of science and the elementary school science classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 109(2), 138–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mohan, L., Chen, J., & Anderson, C. W. (2009). Developing a multi-year learning progression for carbon cycling in socio-ecological systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 675–698. Scholar
  22. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices; cross-cutting concepts; and core ideas. Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  23. Nersessian, N. J. (2002). The cognitive basis of model-based reasoning in science. In P. Carruthers, S. Stich, & M. Siegal (Eds.), The cognitive basis of science (pp. 133–153). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oh, P. S., & Oh, S. J. (2011). What teachers of science need to know about models: An overview. International Journal of Science Education, 33(8), 1109–1130. Scholar
  25. Ryu, S., & Sandoval, W. A. (2012). Improvements to elementary children’s epistemic understanding from sustained argumentation. Science Education, 96(3), 488–526. Scholar
  26. Schwarz, C. V., Reiser, B. J., Davis, E. A., Kenyon, L., Acher, A., Fortus, D., & Krajcik, J. (2009). Developing a learning progression for scientific modeling: Making scientific modeling accessible and meaningful for learners. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 46(6), 632–654. Scholar
  27. Shin, N., Stevens, S. Y., & Krajcik, J. (2010). Tracking student learning over time using construct-centered design. In S. Rodrigues (Ed.), Using analytical frameworks for classroom research. Collecting data analysing narrative (pp. 38–58). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Stevens, S. Y., Delgado, C., & Krajcik, J. S. (2010). Developing a hypothetical multi-dimensional learning progression for the nature of matter. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 687–715. Scholar
  29. Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. T. (2014). Scientific practices in elementary classrooms: Third-grade students’ scientific explanations for seed structure and function. Science Education, 98(4), 614–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Zangori, L., & Forbes, C. T. (2016). Development of an empirically based learning performances framework for 3rd-grade students’ model-based explanations about plant processes. Science Education, 100(6), 961–982. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of MissouriColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations