Skip to main content

Linking Business with Civil Society: The Bridging Role of CSR

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Civil Society: The Engine for Economic and Social Well-Being (GSMAC 2017)

Abstract

The role and the importance of business within our societies are topics of great interest for both academics and practitioners, but the current understanding of this topic is far from being clear or undisputable at the moment. The classic principle that businesses act legally and ethically is a real blessing for the society, denoting that businesses should not get involved in achieving major social or environmental objectives, is at present questionable. For years now, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become a key element in shaping the relation between businesses, public policy, and civil society. In this paper, we are presenting the results of a survey-based research conducted among 109 small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) located in the northwestern region of Romania. The paper addresses the role of CSR as a mediator between businesses and civil society and analyzes the attitude of SMEs’ managers toward CSR activities, as well as the role of businesses in communities and the relation between the intention to conduct CSR activities and their actual implementation. The results show a clear interest of SMEs in CSR and a strong link between the understandings that managers have regarding the role of businesses in society and their social responsibility actions. The most important factor explaining the level of involvement in social activities is related to the attitude of firms’ managers regarding what extent a company should set social welfare as a priority. The implications of these findings show that businesses are socially responsible and civically involved as long as their managers perceive CSR to be essential among for competing individual responsibilities, in other words, they manifest active citizenship (also) in the economic area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aguilera, R., Rupp, D., Williams, C., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 836–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat, F., & Samaratunge, R. (2009). Responsible entrepreneurship in developing countries: Understanding the realities and complexities. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(3), 437–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Azmat, F., & Zutshi, A. (2012). Perceptions of corporate social responsibility amongst immigrant entrepreneurs. Social Responsibility Journal, 8(1), 63–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badulescu, A., Badulescu, D., Saveanu, T., & Hatos, R. (2016). SMEs and social responsibility: Does firm age matter? Bucharest: STRATEGICA Conference “Opportunities & Risks in the Contemporary Business Environment”, Bucharest, October 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badulescu, D., & Petria, N. (2013). Social responsibility of Romanian companies: Contribution to a “Good Society” or expected business strategy? the annals of the university of oradea. Economic Sciences, XXII, 1, 590–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkemeyer, R. (2007). Legitimacy as a key driver and determinant of csr in developing countries, Amsterdam: Paper for the 2007 Marie curie summer school on earth system governance, 28 May–06 June 2007.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner, R. (2009). Organizational culture and leadership: Preconditions for the development of a sustainable corporation. Sustainable Development, 17, 102–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, U. (1997). Reinvention of politics: Rethinking modernity in the global social order. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cacioppe, R., Forster, N., & Fox, M. (2008). A survey of managers’ perceptions of corporate ethics and social responsibility and actions that may affect companies’ success. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(3), 681–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, A. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chahoud, T., Emmerling, J., Kolb, D., Kubina, I., Repinski, G., & Schlager, C. (2007). Corporate social and environmental responsibility in India—assessing the un global compact’s role. Bonn: German Development Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiu, S. C., & Sharfman, M. (2011). Legitimacy, visibility and the antecedentes of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management, 37(6), 1558–1585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciuperca, E. (2011). An explanatory model of corporate social responsibility implementation in Romania. In International conference on social science and humanity IPEDR, 5, pp. V2–11-15. Retrieved February 5, 2017, from http://www.ipedr.com/vol5/no2/4-H10068.pdf.

  • Dahlsrud, A. (2006). How corporate social responsibility is defined: An analysis of 37 definitions. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 18(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deakin, N., & Walsh, K. (1996). The enabling state: The role of markets and contracts. Public Administration, 74(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devinney, T. M. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? the good, bad and ugly of corporate social responsibility. Retrieved February 9, 2017, from https://aom.org/uploadedFiles/Publications/AMP/May09CorpSocialRespbyDevinney.pdf.

  • Du, S., Swaen, V., Lindgreen, A., & Sen, S. (2013). The roles of leadership styles in corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 114(1), 155–169.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2002). Communication from the Commission concerning Corporate Social Responsibility: A business contribution to Sustainable Development. Retrieved March 17, 2017, from http://ec.europa.eu/europeaid/sites/devco/files/communication-corporate-social-responsibility-sustainable-development-com2002347-20020702_en.pdf.

  • Commission, European. (2011). Towards a greater understanding of the changing role of business in society. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate-General for Research & Innovation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson-Graham, J., Cameron, J., & Healy, S. (2013). Take back the economy. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Groves, C., & La Rocca, M. (2011). An empirical study of leader ethical values, transformational and transactional leadership, and follower attitudes toward corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 103, 511–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hastings, G. (2016). CSR: The parable of the bad samaritan. Social Marketing Quarterly, 22(4), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524500416631942.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatos, A. (2003). Participarea comunitară în România. Acțiune colectivă urbană în postsocialism. Iași: Institutul European.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatos, A. (2009). Participarea comunitară în România urbană. Lideri, participanţi şi spectatori ai acţiunilor colective din vecinătăţile din blocurile construite înainte de 1990. Oradea: Editura Universităţii din Oradea.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatos, A., Hatos, R., Badulescu, A., & Badulescu, D. (2015). Are risk attitudes and individualism predictors of entrepreneurship in Romania? Amfiteatru Economic, 17(38), 148–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hemingway, C., & Maclagan, P. (2004). Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofman, P., Moon, J., & Wu, B. (2015). Corporate Social responsibility under authoritarian capitalism: Dynamics and prospects of state-led and society- driven CSR. Business & Society, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1177/0007650315623014.

  • Holford, J., and van der Veen, R. (2003). lifelong learning, governance and active citizenship in Europe. Retrieved April 4, 2017, from https://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/pdf/etgace_en.pdf.

  • Hunt, S., Kiecker, P., & Chonko, B. (1990). Social responsibility and personal success: A research note. Journal of the Academy of Marketing, 18(3), 239–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyner, B., & Payne, D. (2002). Evolution and implementation: A study of values, business ethics and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 41, 297–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolodinsky, R., Madden, T., Zisk, D., & Henkel, E. (2010). Attitudes about corporate social responsibility: Business student predictors. Journal of Business Ethics, 91(2), 167–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I. (2001). Consumers’perceptions of corporate social responsibilities: A cross-cultural comparison. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1), 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). “Implicit” and “Explicit” CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2008). corporate social responsibility, government, and civil society. In A. Crane et al. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 303–323). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moyeen, A., & West, B. (2014). Promoting CSR to foster sustainable development: Attitudes and perceptions of managers in a developing country. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration, 6(2), 97–115. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJBA-05-2013-0036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) 2016. What is corporate responsibility? Retrieved February 26, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/corporate/mne/corporateresponsibilityfrequentlyaskedquestions.htm.

  • Quazi, A., & O’Brien, D. (2000). An empirical test of a cross-national model of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 25(1), 33–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahim, M. (2013). Legal regulation of corporate social responsibility. Chapter 2. Corporate social responsibility, corporate governance and corporate regulation. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, R. B. (2007). Supercapitalism. The Transformation of Business, Democracy, and Everyday Life. NY: Knopf Doubleday Publishing Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandoval, M. (2015). From CSR to RSC: A Contribution to the Critique of the Political Economy of Corporate Social Responsibility. Review of Radical Political Economics, 47(4), 608–624. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613415574266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry, T. (2011). Exploring the role of business in society. IIMB Management Review, 23, 246–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhapakdi, A., Vitell, J., Rallapalli, K., & Kraft, L. (1996). The perceived role of ethics and social responsibility: A scale development. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(11), 1131–1140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ubius, U., & Alas, R. (2009). organizational culture types as predictors of corporate social responsibility. Engineering Economics, 61(1), 90–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldman, D., de Luque, M., Washburn, N., & House, R. (2006). Cultural and leadership predictors of corporate social responsibility values of top management: A GLOBE study of 15 countries. Journal of International Business Studies, 36, 823–837.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Welford, R., Chan, C., & Man, M. (2008). Priorities for corporate social responsibility: A survey of businesses and their stakeholders. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 15(1), 52–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., & Aguilera, R. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in comparative perspective. In A. Crane et al. (Eds.), Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 452–472). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel Bădulescu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Săveanu, T., Bădulescu, D., Filip, F. (2019). Linking Business with Civil Society: The Bridging Role of CSR. In: Văduva, S., Wilt, R., Fotea, I., Văduva, L. (eds) Civil Society: The Engine for Economic and Social Well-Being. GSMAC 2017. Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89872-8_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics