Skip to main content

An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-criteria Approach for Evaluation of Energy Resources: A Case Study of Turkey

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Role of Exergy in Energy and the Environment

Part of the book series: Green Energy and Technology ((GREEN))

  • 1006 Accesses

Abstract

The energy consumption of the world has been increasing in a consistent trend. This increment is faster than overall energy supply. The construction of additional power plants is essential to keep up with meeting the growing total energy demand. However, the effects of these power plants on social life and local economy should be considered during the planning stage. In this chapter, a Delphi method integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making methodology is proposed to evaluate and to compare power plant alternatives. This approach is based on the fuzzy logarithmic least squares method and performs good solutions under implicit information conditions. The methodology is tested in a case study to find the optimal plant type for Turkey. The numerical results together with conducted sensitivity analysis provide insights on the strength and feasibility of the proposed method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. International Energy Agency, Key world energy statistics (2007) website http://892www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2007/key_stats_2007.pdf, (2008)

  2. Kahraman C, Kaya I (2010) A fuzzy multi criteria methodology for selection among energy alternatives. Expert Syst Appl 37(9):6270–6281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beccali M, Cellura M, Mistretta M (2003) Decision making in energy planning: application of the ELECTRE method at regional level for the diffusion of renewable energy technology. Renew Energy 28:2063–2087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Burton J, Hubacek K (2007) Is small beautiful? A multicriteria assessment of small-scale energy technology applications in local governments. Energy Policy 35(12):6402–6412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Stagl S (2006) Multicriteria evaluation and public participation: the case of UK energy policy. Land Use Policy 23(1):53–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Diakoulaki D, Georgiou P, Tourkolias C, Georgopoulou E, Lalas D, Mirasgedis S, Sarafidis Y (2007) A multicriteria approach to identify investment opportunities for the exploitation of the clean development mechanism. Energy Policy 35(2):1088–1099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kowalski K, Stagl S, Madlener R, Omann I (2009) Sustainable energy futures: methodological challenges in combining scenarios and participatory multi-criteria analysis. Eur J Oper Res 197(3):1063–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Begic F, Afgan NH (2007) Sustainability assessment tool for the decision making in selection of energy system – Bosnian case. Energy 32:1979–1985

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Aragones BP, Chaparro GF, Pastor FJP, Rodriguez PF (2010) An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects. Renew Sust Energy Rev 14(1):249–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. San CJR (2011) Multi-criteria decision-making in the selection of a renewable energy project in Spain: the Vikor method. Renew Energy 36(2):498–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cavallaro F, Ciraolo L (2005) A multicriteria approach to evaluate wind energy plants on an Italian Island. Energy Policy 33:235–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Haralambopoulos DA, Polatidis H (2003) Renewable energy projects: structuring a multicriteria group decision-making framework. Renew Energy 28(6):961–973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6577–6585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010) Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR & AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35(6):2517–2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kahraman C, Kaya ˙I, Cebi S (2009) A comparative analysis for multiattribute selection among renewable energy alternatives using fuzzy axiomatic design and fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Energy 34(10):1603–1616

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kwiesielewicz M (1996) The logarithmic least squares and the generalized pseudoinverse in estimating ratios. Eur J Oper Res 93(3):611–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Wang YM, Elhag TMS, Hua Z (2006) A modified fuzzy logarithmic least squares method for fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Fuzzy Sets Syst 157(23):3055–3071

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Sung WC (2001) Application of Delphi method, a qualitative and quantitative analysis, to the health care management. J Healthc Manag 2(2):11–19

    Google Scholar 

  20. Changa CW, Wub CR, Linc HL (2009) Applying fuzzy hierarchy multiple attributes to construct an expert decision making process. Expert Syst Appl 36(4):7363–7368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Abbasbandy S, Asady B (2006) Ranking of fuzzy numbers by sign distance. Inf Sci 176(16):2405–2416

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Atilgan B, Azapagic A (2016) Renewable electricity in Turkey: life cycle environmental impacts. Renew Energy 89:649–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Turan HH, Erbiyik H, Unver U (2017) Utilisation of fuzzy multicriteria method for selection of energy alternatives for Turkey, The 9th international exergy, energy and environment symposium (IEEES-9), pp 407–414

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This article is the extended version of the earlier work of Turan et al. published in the 9th International Exergy, Energy and Environment Symposium (IEEES-9) Proceedings book with title the Utilisation of Fuzzy Multicriteria Method for Selection of Energy Alternatives for Turkey [23].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hasan Hüseyin Turan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Turan, H.H., Unver, U., Erbıyık, H. (2018). An Integrated Fuzzy Multi-criteria Approach for Evaluation of Energy Resources: A Case Study of Turkey. In: Nižetić, S., Papadopoulos, A. (eds) The Role of Exergy in Energy and the Environment. Green Energy and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89845-2_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89845-2_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89844-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89845-2

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics