Abstract
Many researchers propose that the Anthropocene represents a new division of geological time, positing that our activity by our use of fossil fuels has warmed the planet, raised sea levels, eroded the ozone layer and acidified the oceans. We contend the Anthropocene can only be understood in an interdisciplinary way, integrating ideas from the natural and social sciences with philosophy. That is, by means of STEAM.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
When we mention ‘Man’ in this chapter, we mean, as Aristotle said, ‘the animal who has language’, which is the human capacity to make history, and this is, undoubtedly, a natural datum which distinguishes our species from the others; of course, we don’t refer to ‘Man’ as a male species but to Homo sapiens, to human life generally, both female and male.
- 2.
According to Heidegger, death is only a simple refection of authentic dying.
- 3.
We can also use the following synonyms, the endless and the invariant, using Chomsky’s terms, the eternal, in Augustine’s terms, and the language faculty, in Saussurian jargon.
References
AGeI (2017) Programme and abstracts 32nd Italian geographic congress: “the contribution of geography among revolutions and reforms”. Association of Italian Geographers (AGeI), Bologna. ISBN: 978-88-942641-0-4
Arendt A (1958, 1998) The human condition. 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Augustine of Hippo, Confessiones (it. transl. 2006 with Latin text Le Confessioni, Rizzoli, Milano, 29th edn). Book 11
Baranzoni S, Lucci A, Vignola P (2016) L’Antropocene. Fine, medium o sintomo dell’uomo? Lo Sguardo, Rivista di Filosofia 22(3):5–9
Bobrowsky P, Cronin VS, Di Capua G, Kieffer SW, Peppoloni S (2017) The emerging field of geoethics. In: Gundersen LC (ed) Scientific integrity and ethics with applications to the geosciences, Special Publication American Geophysical Union, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Bohle M (2015) Geoethics: from “blind spot” to common good. In: International Association for Promoting Geoethics blog. iapgeoethicsblogspotit. Available online June 13, 2015
Bohle M (2016) Handling of human-geosphere intersections. Geosciences 6(3):1–11
Bonneuil C, Fressoz J (2013) L’événement anthropocène. La Terre, l’histoire et nous. Éditions du Seuil, Paris
Bonneuil C, Fressoz J (2016) The shock of the Anthropocene: the earth, history and us. Verso, London
Carrington D (2016) The Anthropocene epoch: scientists declare dawn of human-influenced age. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/29/declare-anthropocene-epoch-experts-urge-geological-congress-human-impact-earth. [29 August 2016]
Castree N (2014a) The Anthropocene and geography I: the back story. Geograph Compass 8(7):436–449
Castree N (2014b) The Anthropocene and geography II: current contributions. Geograph Compass 8(7):450–463
Castree N (2014c) The Anthropocene and geography III: future directions. Geograph Compass 8(7):464–476
Chakrabarty D (2012) Postcolonial studies and the challenge of climate change. New Lit Hist 43(1):1–18
Cimatti F (2013) Filosofia dell’animalità. Laterza, Roma-Bari
Cook BR, Richards LA, Rutherfurd I (2015) Geographies of the Anthropocene. Geogr Res 53(3):231–243
Crutzen PJ (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature 415:23
Crutzen PJ (2005) Welcome to the anthropocene! Andrea Parlangeli Ed, Milano
Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The Anthropocene. IGBP Newsl 41:17–18
De Pascale F, Bernardo M, Muto F, D’Amico S, Zumbo R, Galea P, Agius M (2015) Neogeography and seismic risk perception. A comparison between two case-studies: Calabria (southern Italy), Malta. Eur J Geogr 6(1):64–83
De Pascale F, Bernardo M, Muto F, Ruffolo A, Dattilo V (2016) Geoethics, neogeography and risk perception: myth, natural and human factors in archaic and postmodern society. In: D’Amico S (ed) Earthquakes and their impact on society. Springer Natural Hazards, International Publishing, Cham, pp 665–692
De Pascale F, Bernardo M, Muto F, Di Matteo D, Dattilo V (2017) Resilience and seismic risk perception at school: a geoethical experiment in Aiello Calabro, southern Italy. Nat Hazards J Int Soc Prev Mitigation Nat Hazards 86(Suppl. 2):569–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2696-z
Ellis E (2011) Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Phil Trans R Soc A 369:1010–1035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0331
Ellis E (2016) Evolving toward a better Anthropocene. Future Earth Blog. Research for Global Sustainability. Available from: http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2016-mar-29/evolving-toward-better-anthropocene. [16 March 2016]
Giorda C (2016) Lo studio dell’Antropocene: una svolta anche per la geografia? Ambiente Società Territorio Geografia nelle scuole 61(3):3–8
Hamilton C (2010) Requiem for a species: why we resist the truth about climate change. Earthscan, London
Hamilton C (2016) Define the anthropocene in terms of the whole Earth. Nature 536:251. Available from: http://www.nature.com/news/define-the-anthropocene-in-terms-of-the-whole-earth-1.20427. [17 August 2016]. https://doi.org/10.1038/536251a
Hamilton C, Grinevald J (2015) Was the Anthropocene anticipated? The Anthropocene Review, pp 1–14
Haraway DJ (2016) Staying with the trouble: anthropocene, capitalocene, chthulucene. In: Moore JW (ed) Anthropocene or capitalocene? nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press, Oakland
Heidegger M (1927) Sein und Zeit, Halle-Saale (it. transl. 1976, Essere e tempo, Longanesi, Milano)
Hyppolite J et al (1980) In: Salvadori R (ed) Interpretazioni hegeliane. La Nuova Italia, Firenze
International Association for Promoting Geoethics (IAPG) (2015) International association for promoting geoethics. Available from: http://www.geoethics.org
Kojève A (1947) Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Gallimard, Paris (it. transl. 1996, Introduzione alla lettura di Hegel, Lezioni sulla fenomenologia dello spirito, Adelphi, Milano)
Latour B (2012) Enquêtes sur les modes d’existence: une anthropologie des modernes. La Découverte, Paris
Latour B (2013) Facing Gaia. Six lectures on the political theology of nature. Gifford Lectures, Edinburgh
Latour B (2015) Face à Gaïa. Huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique, Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond. La Découverte, Paris
Limaye SD (2015) A geoethical approach to industrial development of georesources and groundwater use: the Indian experience. In: Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (eds) Geoethics: the role and responsibility of geoscientists. Geological Society, London, Lyell Collection (Special Publications), vol 419, pp 13–18
Lorimer J (2012) Multinatural geographies of the Antropocene. Prog Hum Geogr 36(5):593–612
Matteucci R, Gosso G, Peppoloni S, Piacente S, Wasowski J (2012) A Hippocratic Oath for geologists? Ann Geophys 55(3):365–369
Monastersky R (2015a) First atomic blast proposed as start of Anthropocene. Nature. Available from: http://www.nature.com/news/first-atomic-blast-proposed-as-start-of-anthropocene-1.16739. [16 January 2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.16739
Monastersky R (2015b) Anthropocene: the human age. Nature 519(7542):144–147
Moore JW (2016) Introduction. Anthropocene or capitalocene? nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. In: Moore JV (ed) Anthropocene or cpitalocene? nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press, Oakland, pp 1–11
Nietzsche F (1883–85) Also sprach Zarathustra Ein Buch für Alle und Keinen (it. transl. 1965, Così parlò Zarathustra, Mursia, Milano, XIV ed.)
Oppermann S, Iovino S (2017) The environmental humanities and the challenges of the anthropocene. In: Oppermann S, Iovino S (eds) Environmental humanities: voices from the anthropocene. Rowman & Littlefield International – Intersections, London/New York
Paál G (2015) Geoethics, the Anthropocene and the pope. In: International association for promoting geoethics blog. Available from: iapgeoethics.blogspot.it. [11 July 2015]
Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2012) Geoethics and geological culture: awareness, responsibility and challenges. Ann Geophys 55:3. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6099
Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2015a) Introduction. In: Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (eds) Geoethics: the role and responsibility of geoscientists. Geological Society, London, Lyell Collection (Special Publications), 419, pp 1–4
Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2015b) The meaning of geoethics. In: Wyss M, Peppoloni S (eds) Geoethics: ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799935-7.000
Peppoloni, S, Bobrowsky, P, & Di Capua, G 2015, ‘Geoethics: a challenge for research integrity in geosciences’, in N Steneck, M Anderson, S Kleinert & T. Mayer (eds), Integrity in the global research arena, World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore, pp. 287–294
Pievani T (2009) The world after Charles R. Darwin: continuity, Unity in diversity, contingency. Rend Fis Acc Lincei, Springer 20:355–361
Pievani T (2012) Geoethics and philosophy of earth sciences: the role of geophysical factors in human evolution. In: Peppoloni S, Di Caupua G (eds) Geoethics and geological culture. Reflections from the Geoitalia conference 2011, annals of geophysics (special issue), 55, 3, pp 349–353
Rilke RM (1923) Duineser Elegien, Insel Verlag, Frankfurt (it. transl. 1978, Elegie Duinesi, Giulio Einaudi Editore, Torino)
Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc A 369(1938):842–867
Trachtenberg Z (2016) Bringing conversation to the Anthropocene. FutureEarth blog, Research for global sustainability. Available from: http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2016-aug-24/bringing-conversation-anthropocene. [24 August 2016]
Travis C, Holm P (2017) Lessons for the Anthropocene from the recent past: tobacco use, HIV/AIDS, and social transformation. Global and Planetary Change. Available online 20 April 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.04.006
Vernadsky WI (1924) La Géochimie. Librairie Félix Alcan, Paris
Whitehead M (2014) Environmental transformations. A geography of the anthropocene. Routledge, London/New York
Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Smith A, Barry TL, Bown PR, Rawson P, Brenchley P, Cantrill D, Coe AE, Gale A, Gibbard PL, Gregory FJ, Hounslow M, Kerr A, Pearson P, Knox R, Powell P, Waters C, Marshall J, Oates M, Rawson P, Stone P (2008) Are we now living in the Anthropocene. GSA Today 18(2):4–8
Zalasiewicz J et al (2014) When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal. Quaternary Int. Available online 12 January 2015
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dattilo, V., De Pascale, F. (2019). Geomorphology and Philosophy: A STEAM Survey of the Anthropocene. In: de la Garza, A., Travis, C. (eds) The STEAM Revolution . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89818-6_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89818-6_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89817-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89818-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)