Skip to main content

Geomorphology and Philosophy: A STEAM Survey of the Anthropocene

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The STEAM Revolution

Abstract

Many researchers propose that the Anthropocene represents a new division of geological time, positing that our activity by our use of fossil fuels has warmed the planet, raised sea levels, eroded the ozone layer and acidified the oceans. We contend the Anthropocene can only be understood in an interdisciplinary way, integrating ideas from the natural and social sciences with philosophy. That is, by means of STEAM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When we mention ‘Man’ in this chapter, we mean, as Aristotle said, ‘the animal who has language’, which is the human capacity to make history, and this is, undoubtedly, a natural datum which distinguishes our species from the others; of course, we don’t refer to ‘Man’ as a male species but to Homo sapiens, to human life generally, both female and male.

  2. 2.

    According to Heidegger, death is only a simple refection of authentic dying.

  3. 3.

    We can also use the following synonyms, the endless and the invariant, using Chomsky’s terms, the eternal, in Augustine’s terms, and the language faculty, in Saussurian jargon.

References

  • AGeI (2017) Programme and abstracts 32nd Italian geographic congress: “the contribution of geography among revolutions and reforms”. Association of Italian Geographers (AGeI), Bologna. ISBN: 978-88-942641-0-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Arendt A (1958, 1998) The human condition. 2nd edn. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustine of Hippo, Confessiones (it. transl. 2006 with Latin text Le Confessioni, Rizzoli, Milano, 29th edn). Book 11

    Google Scholar 

  • Baranzoni S, Lucci A, Vignola P (2016) L’Antropocene. Fine, medium o sintomo dell’uomo? Lo Sguardo, Rivista di Filosofia 22(3):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Bobrowsky P, Cronin VS, Di Capua G, Kieffer SW, Peppoloni S (2017) The emerging field of geoethics. In: Gundersen LC (ed) Scientific integrity and ethics with applications to the geosciences, Special Publication American Geophysical Union, John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bohle M (2015) Geoethics: from “blind spot” to common good. In: International Association for Promoting Geoethics blog. iapgeoethicsblogspotit. Available online June 13, 2015

  • Bohle M (2016) Handling of human-geosphere intersections. Geosciences 6(3):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil C, Fressoz J (2013) L’événement anthropocène. La Terre, l’histoire et nous. Éditions du Seuil, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonneuil C, Fressoz J (2016) The shock of the Anthropocene: the earth, history and us. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrington D (2016) The Anthropocene epoch: scientists declare dawn of human-influenced age. The Guardian. Available from: https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/aug/29/declare-anthropocene-epoch-experts-urge-geological-congress-human-impact-earth. [29 August 2016]

  • Castree N (2014a) The Anthropocene and geography I: the back story. Geograph Compass 8(7):436–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree N (2014b) The Anthropocene and geography II: current contributions. Geograph Compass 8(7):450–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castree N (2014c) The Anthropocene and geography III: future directions. Geograph Compass 8(7):464–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakrabarty D (2012) Postcolonial studies and the challenge of climate change. New Lit Hist 43(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cimatti F (2013) Filosofia dell’animalità. Laterza, Roma-Bari

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook BR, Richards LA, Rutherfurd I (2015) Geographies of the Anthropocene. Geogr Res 53(3):231–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ (2002) Geology of mankind. Nature 415:23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ (2005) Welcome to the anthropocene! Andrea Parlangeli Ed, Milano

    Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ, Stoermer EF (2000) The Anthropocene. IGBP Newsl 41:17–18

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pascale F, Bernardo M, Muto F, D’Amico S, Zumbo R, Galea P, Agius M (2015) Neogeography and seismic risk perception. A comparison between two case-studies: Calabria (southern Italy), Malta. Eur J Geogr 6(1):64–83

    Google Scholar 

  • De Pascale F, Bernardo M, Muto F, Ruffolo A, Dattilo V (2016) Geoethics, neogeography and risk perception: myth, natural and human factors in archaic and postmodern society. In: D’Amico S (ed) Earthquakes and their impact on society. Springer Natural Hazards, International Publishing, Cham, pp 665–692

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • De Pascale F, Bernardo M, Muto F, Di Matteo D, Dattilo V (2017) Resilience and seismic risk perception at school: a geoethical experiment in Aiello Calabro, southern Italy. Nat Hazards J Int Soc Prev Mitigation Nat Hazards 86(Suppl. 2):569–586. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2696-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis E (2011) Anthropogenic transformation of the terrestrial biosphere. Phil Trans R Soc A 369:1010–1035. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2010.0331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis E (2016) Evolving toward a better Anthropocene. Future Earth Blog. Research for Global Sustainability. Available from: http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2016-mar-29/evolving-toward-better-anthropocene. [16 March 2016]

  • Giorda C (2016) Lo studio dell’Antropocene: una svolta anche per la geografia? Ambiente Società Territorio Geografia nelle scuole 61(3):3–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton C (2010) Requiem for a species: why we resist the truth about climate change. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton C (2016) Define the anthropocene in terms of the whole Earth. Nature 536:251. Available from: http://www.nature.com/news/define-the-anthropocene-in-terms-of-the-whole-earth-1.20427. [17 August 2016]. https://doi.org/10.1038/536251a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton C, Grinevald J (2015) Was the Anthropocene anticipated? The Anthropocene Review, pp 1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haraway DJ (2016) Staying with the trouble: anthropocene, capitalocene, chthulucene. In: Moore JW (ed) Anthropocene or capitalocene? nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger M (1927) Sein und Zeit, Halle-Saale (it. transl. 1976, Essere e tempo, Longanesi, Milano)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyppolite J et al (1980) In: Salvadori R (ed) Interpretazioni hegeliane. La Nuova Italia, Firenze

    Google Scholar 

  • International Association for Promoting Geoethics (IAPG) (2015) International association for promoting geoethics. Available from: http://www.geoethics.org

  • Kojève A (1947) Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Gallimard, Paris (it. transl. 1996, Introduzione alla lettura di Hegel, Lezioni sulla fenomenologia dello spirito, Adelphi, Milano)

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2012) Enquêtes sur les modes d’existence: une anthropologie des modernes. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2013) Facing Gaia. Six lectures on the political theology of nature. Gifford Lectures, Edinburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B (2015) Face à Gaïa. Huit conférences sur le nouveau régime climatique, Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond. La Découverte, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Limaye SD (2015) A geoethical approach to industrial development of georesources and groundwater use: the Indian experience. In: Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (eds) Geoethics: the role and responsibility of geoscientists. Geological Society, London, Lyell Collection (Special Publications), vol 419, pp 13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorimer J (2012) Multinatural geographies of the Antropocene. Prog Hum Geogr 36(5):593–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matteucci R, Gosso G, Peppoloni S, Piacente S, Wasowski J (2012) A Hippocratic Oath for geologists? Ann Geophys 55(3):365–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Monastersky R (2015a) First atomic blast proposed as start of Anthropocene. Nature. Available from: http://www.nature.com/news/first-atomic-blast-proposed-as-start-of-anthropocene-1.16739. [16 January 2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature.2015.16739

  • Monastersky R (2015b) Anthropocene: the human age. Nature 519(7542):144–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore JW (2016) Introduction. Anthropocene or capitalocene? nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. In: Moore JV (ed) Anthropocene or cpitalocene? nature, history, and the crisis of capitalism. PM Press, Oakland, pp 1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Nietzsche F (1883–85) Also sprach Zarathustra Ein Buch für Alle und Keinen (it. transl. 1965, Così parlò Zarathustra, Mursia, Milano, XIV ed.)

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppermann S, Iovino S (2017) The environmental humanities and the challenges of the anthropocene. In: Oppermann S, Iovino S (eds) Environmental humanities: voices from the anthropocene. Rowman & Littlefield International – Intersections, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Paál G (2015) Geoethics, the Anthropocene and the pope. In: International association for promoting geoethics blog. Available from: iapgeoethics.blogspot.it. [11 July 2015]

  • Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2012) Geoethics and geological culture: awareness, responsibility and challenges. Ann Geophys 55:3. https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-6099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2015a) Introduction. In: Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (eds) Geoethics: the role and responsibility of geoscientists. Geological Society, London, Lyell Collection (Special Publications), 419, pp 1–4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppoloni S, Di Capua G (2015b) The meaning of geoethics. In: Wyss M, Peppoloni S (eds) Geoethics: ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-799935-7.000

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Peppoloni, S, Bobrowsky, P, & Di Capua, G 2015, ‘Geoethics: a challenge for research integrity in geosciences’, in N Steneck, M Anderson, S Kleinert & T. Mayer (eds), Integrity in the global research arena, World Scientific Publishing Co, Singapore, pp. 287–294

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pievani T (2009) The world after Charles R. Darwin: continuity, Unity in diversity, contingency. Rend Fis Acc Lincei, Springer 20:355–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pievani T (2012) Geoethics and philosophy of earth sciences: the role of geophysical factors in human evolution. In: Peppoloni S, Di Caupua G (eds) Geoethics and geological culture. Reflections from the Geoitalia conference 2011, annals of geophysics (special issue), 55, 3, pp 349–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Rilke RM (1923) Duineser Elegien, Insel Verlag, Frankfurt (it. transl. 1978, Elegie Duinesi, Giulio Einaudi Editore, Torino)

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffen W, Grinevald J, Crutzen PJ, McNeill JR (2011) The Anthropocene: conceptual and historical perspectives. Phil Trans R Soc A 369(1938):842–867

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trachtenberg Z (2016) Bringing conversation to the Anthropocene. FutureEarth blog, Research for global sustainability. Available from: http://www.futureearth.org/blog/2016-aug-24/bringing-conversation-anthropocene. [24 August 2016]

  • Travis C, Holm P (2017) Lessons for the Anthropocene from the recent past: tobacco use, HIV/AIDS, and social transformation. Global and Planetary Change. Available online 20 April 2017. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2017.04.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernadsky WI (1924) La Géochimie. Librairie Félix Alcan, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead M (2014) Environmental transformations. A geography of the anthropocene. Routledge, London/New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz J, Williams M, Smith A, Barry TL, Bown PR, Rawson P, Brenchley P, Cantrill D, Coe AE, Gale A, Gibbard PL, Gregory FJ, Hounslow M, Kerr A, Pearson P, Knox R, Powell P, Waters C, Marshall J, Oates M, Rawson P, Stone P (2008) Are we now living in the Anthropocene. GSA Today 18(2):4–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zalasiewicz J et al (2014) When did the Anthropocene begin? A mid-twentieth century boundary level is stratigraphically optimal. Quaternary Int. Available online 12 January 2015

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dattilo, V., De Pascale, F. (2019). Geomorphology and Philosophy: A STEAM Survey of the Anthropocene. In: de la Garza, A., Travis, C. (eds) The STEAM Revolution . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89818-6_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics