Abstract
Organizations face various choices as they seek to manage Country Risk. If they understand their exposure to this risk, they can further evaluate (i) the approaches available to mitigate it; (ii) the costs relative to the benefits; and (iii) any additional or new issues they may incur, including credit, market, and operational risk. The foundation or any strategy to mitigate Country Risk is careful assessment based on rigorous research. Among the most traditional approaches to mitigate Country Risks are risk limits and diversification of suppliers, trading counterparties, and banks. Other approaches involve guarantees, financial hedging transactions, master netting agreements, and collateral. Various governmental and multilateral organization provide sources of additional support to protect against the risks relating to exports and trade financing, including the World Bank, the Multilateral Investments Guarantee Agency, the International Finance Corporation, the Overseas Private Investment Corporation, Coface, and various export credit agencies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asian Development Bank. 2017. “Viet Nam: Cofinancing.” https://www.adb.org/countries/viet-nam/cofinancing.
Asian Development Bank. “Guarantees.” https://www.adb.org/site/private-sector-financing/commercial-cofinancing/guarantees.
Business and Human Rights Resource Center. 2014. “Total Lawsuit in Belgium (re Myanmar).” https://business-humanrights.org/en/total-lawsuit-in-belgium-re-myanmar.
Chevron. 2017. “Human Rights Respect for Human Rights Is Rooted in Our Values and Applies Wherever We Do Business.” Corporate Responsibility. https://www.chevron.com/corporate-responsibility/people/human-rights.
International Finance Corporation. 2016. “Mobilizing Large-Scale Financing for Infrastructure.” Impact at IFC, October.
International Finance Corporation. 2017. “Products and Services.” http://www.ifc.org/wps/wcm/connect/CORP_EXT_Content/IFC_External_Corporate_Site/Solutions/Products+and+Services.
LafargeHolcim. 2017. “LafargeHolcim Responds to Syria Review.” Press Release, March 3. http://www.lafargeholcim.com/LafargeHolcim-responds-syria-review.
Mapila, Kopo, Morten Lauridsen, and Carl Chastenay 2017. “Mobilizing Institutional Investments into Emerging Market Infrastructure.” Note No 36. EMCompass. IFC, April.
Masud, Faarea. 2017. “Chevron Says It Will Push for Myanmar Human Rights.” BBC News, November 16. http://www.bbc.com/news/business-41977909.
MIGA. 2015. “MIGA’s Support to the Middle East and North Africa.” Brief MENA. https://www.miga.org/documents/menabrief.pdf.
Noonan, Laura. 2017. “Vietnam’s Nascent Debt Markets Set for Bigger Deals.” Financial Times, December 13.
Reuters. 2014. “Tunisia Issues $825 Million Bonds in the Domestic Japanese Market.” October 10.
Walt, Vivienne. 2010. “Chevron, Total Accused of Human-Rights Abuses in Burma.” Time, July 6.
Wezel, Torsten. 2004. Does Co-Financing by Multilateral Development Banks Increase “Risky” Direct Investment in Emerging Markets?—Evidence for German Banking FDI.” Discussion Paper Series 1: Studies of the Economic Research Centre No 02/2004.
World Bank and Rothschild & C. 2016. Utilizing World Bank Partial Guarantees in Support of Sovereign or Sub—Sovereign Commercial Debt Financings, August.
World Bank. 2017. “Guarantees Program.” http://www.worldbank.org/en/programs/guarantees-program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 15.1 Best Practices for Mitigating Risk in FX Transactions
Appendix 15.1 Best Practices for Mitigating Risk in FX Transactions
In May of 2017, the FX Global Code was issued by a group consisting of central banks and participants in the global foreign exchange trading market. The document, which reflected feedback by individuals in sixteen jurisdictions, was intended to summarize sound practices for the foreign exchange trading market. The goal of the initiative was to “promote a robust, fair, liquid, open and appropriately transparent market in which a diverse set of Market Participants are able to confidently and effectively transact at competitive prices that reflect available market information and in a manner that conforms to acceptable standards of behavior” (https://www.globalfxc.org/fx_global_code.htm).
The Code includes fifty five principles, including Principles 24-41 devoted to risk management and compliance. The overarching theme for risk management was described as follows: “Market Participants are expected to promote and maintain a robust control and compliance environment to effectively identify, manage and report on the risks associated with their engagement in the FX Market.”
The Code expressly recognizes the following “key risk types”:
-
Credit and Counterparty Risk
-
Market Risk
-
Operational Risk
-
Technology Risk
-
Settlement Risk
-
Compliance Risk
-
Legal Risk
To manage these risks, the Code calls for a range of practices, including:
-
Clear ownership of the business decisions by the business unit
-
Independent risk management function
-
Independent compliance function
-
Independent audit function to review internal control systems
-
Timely reporting of understandable risk and compliance-related information to senior management
-
The use of master netting agreements and collateral
-
Independent reporting of the current market value of trading positions
-
Adequate resources and employees with clearly specified roles, responsibility, and authority
-
Appropriate processes to identify and manage operational risks
-
Documented policies, procedures, and controls
-
Robust risk assessment and approval processes for both new and existing products and services.
Although the Code does not explicitly contemplate Country Risk as a separate “key risk type,” it must be carefully considered by regulators, market participants, and other stakeholders. It is relevant to the assessment of all applicable risks in foreign exchange trading (and any other forms of bilateral transactions, including derivatives). Particular emphasis must be given to scenarios where a problem in one country or region has the potential to give rise to problems in other countries and regions.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bouchet, M.H., Fishkin, C.A., Goguel, A. (2018). Country Risk Mitigation Strategies. In: Managing Country Risk in an Age of Globalization. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89752-3_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89752-3_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89751-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89752-3
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)