Advertisement

Chaucerotics pp 183-213 | Cite as

“And of his owene thought he wax al reed”: Chaucerotics and the Poetics of Prostitution in The Shipman’s Tale

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

Chapter  6 focuses on the Chauceroticism in The Shipman’s Tale, an audacious story of lies, deceit, and adultery. Due to its persistent linguistic innuendo, the tale offers an especially keen test case for Chaucer’s use of the “cloak of language” in his bawdy verse. It also presents the “poetics of prostitution,” an economically charged erotics that is appropriate for a text that commodifies sex literally and figuratively. Gust shows that the tale is fundamentally different than Chaucer’s previous fabliaux, as it presents salacious games wherein everybody wins in the end, and no one gets hurt in the process. In this tale, the poet refuses to condemn the sexual misdeeds at hand and, instead, invites the reader to enjoy the pleasures of the characters’ illicit sexual transactions.

Works Cited

  1. Beidler, Peter G. 1996. The Price of Sex in Chaucer’s Shipman’s Tale. Chaucer Review 31 (1): 5–17.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1998. Contrasting Masculinities in the Shipman’s Tale: Monk, Merchant, and Wife. In Masculinities in Chaucer: Approaches to Maleness in the Canterbury Tales and Troilus and Criseyde, ed. Peter G. Beidler, 131–142. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  3. ———. 2006. Chaucer’s French Accent: Gardens and Sex-Talk in the Shipman’s Tale. In Comic Provocations, ed. Holly Crocker, 149–161. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. ———. 2009. Medieval Children Witness Their Mothers’ Indiscretions: The Maid Child in Chaucer’s Shipman’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 44 (2): 186–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Benson, C. David. 1986. Chaucer’s Drama of Style: Poetic Variety and Contrast in the Canterbury Tales. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  6. Blamires, Alcuin. 2006. Chaucer, Ethics, and Gender. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaucer’s Poetry: An Anthology for the Modern Reader. 1975. Edited by E.T. Donaldson. New York: The Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
  8. Coletti, Theresa. 1981. The Mulier Fortis and Chaucer’s Shipman’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 15 (3): 236–249.Google Scholar
  9. Cooper, Helen. 1996. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Dane, Joseph A. 2004. The Wife of Baths’ Shipman’s Tale and the Invention of Chaucerian Fabliaux. Modern Language Review 99 (2): 287–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dollimore, Jonathan. 1991. Sexual Dissidence: Augustine to Wilde, Freud to Foucault. Oxford and New York: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Finlayson, John. 2002. Chaucer’s Shipman’s Tale, Boccaccio, and the “Civilizing” of Fabliau. The Chaucer Review 36 (4): 336–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hahn, Thomas. 1986. Money, Sexuality, Wordplay, and Context in the Shipman’s Tale. In Chaucer in the Eighties, ed. Julian Wasserman and Robert J. Blanch, 235–249. Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Hines, John. 1993. The Fabliau in English. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  15. Hume, Cathy. 2006. Domestic Opportunities: The Social Comedy of the Shipman’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 41 (2): 139–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Karras, Ruth Mazo. 2005. Sexuality in Medieval Europe: Doing Unto Others. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Kendrick, Laura. 1988. Chaucerian Play: Comedy and Control in the Canterbury Tales. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  18. Lacan, Jacques. 1977. The Signification of the Phallus. In Écrits: Selection. Translated by Alan Sheridan, 281–291. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.Google Scholar
  19. Lawrence, William W. 1958. Chaucer’s Shipman’s Tale. Speculum 33 (1): 56–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. McClintock, Michael W. 1970. Games and the Players of Games: Old French Fabliaux and the Shipman’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 5: 112–136.Google Scholar
  21. Middle English Dictionary. Online version available at http://quod.lib.umich.edu/m/med/.
  22. Nicholson, Peter. 1978. The “Shipman’s Tale” and the Fabliaux. ELH 45 (4): 583–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Pearsall, Derek. 1985. The Canterbury Tales. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Pugh, Tison. 2004. Queering Medieval Genres. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Richardson, Janette. 1970. Blameth Nat Me: A Study of Imagery in Chaucer’s Fabliaux. The Hague: Mouton & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. The Riverside Chaucer. 1987. Edited by Larry D. Benson. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  27. Rushton, Cory J., and Amanda Hopkins. 2007. Introduction: The Revel, the Melodye, and the Bisynesse of Solas. In The Erotic in the Literature of Medieval Britain, ed. Amanda Hopkins and Cory James Rushton, 1–17. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  28. Scattergood, V.J. 1977. The Originality of the Shipman’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 11 (3): 211–231.Google Scholar
  29. Silverman, Albert H. 1953. Sex and Money in Chaucer’s Shipman’s Tale. Philological Quarterly 32: 329–336.Google Scholar
  30. Spargo, John. 1930. Chaucer’s Shipman’s Tale: The Lover’s Gift Regained. Helsinki: Folklore Fellows Communications.Google Scholar
  31. Williams, Linda. 1989. Hard Core: Power, Pleasure, and the “Frenzy of the Visible”. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
    • 1
  1. 1.School of General StudiesStockton UniversityGallowayUSA

Personalised recommendations