Advertisement

Chaucerotics pp 141-182 | Cite as

“And in he throng”: The Anti-Chivalric Chauceroticism of The Merchant’s Tale

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
Chapter
Part of the The New Middle Ages book series (TNMA)

Abstract

In this chapter, Gust examines The Merchant’s Tale, another fabliau from The Canterbury Tales that raises difficult questions about the meaning and significance of Chaucerotics. By detailing the lewd sexual escapades of the grizzled knight January and his young bride May, Chaucer offers a shocking “anti-chivalric” story that forces the reader to consider their own complicity in the narrative’s eroticized voyeurism. With its graphic sexuality and resentful tone, The Merchant's Tale offers another boundary-pushing example of Chaucerotics that includes multiple sex scenes, love affairs that are both sanctioned and illicit, and perhaps the most explicit representation of sexual penetration in the entire Middle English literary corpus. These extraordinary features render this particular tale as being especially reminiscent of the generic requirements of classical literary pornography.

Works Cited

  1. Beidler, Peter G. 1971. The Climax in the Merchant’s Tale. Chaucer Review 6 (1): 38–43.Google Scholar
  2. ———. 1972. Chaucer’s Merchant and the Tale of January. Costerus 5: 1–25.Google Scholar
  3. Benson, C. David. 1986. Chaucer’s Drama of Style: Poetic Variety and Contrast in the Canterbury Tales. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  4. Blamires, Alcuin. 2006. Chaucer, Ethics, and Gender. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brown, Emerson, Jr. 1969. Hortus Inconclusus: The Significance of Priapus and Pyramus and Thisbe in the Merchant’s Tale. Chaucer Review 4 (1): 31–40.Google Scholar
  6. Chaucer’s Poetry: An Anthology for the Modern Reader. 1975. Edited by E.T. Donaldson. New York: The Ronald Press Company.Google Scholar
  7. Condren, Edward I. 1985. Transcendent Metaphor or Banal Reality: Three Chaucerian Dilemmas. Papers on Language and Literature 21 (3): 233–257.Google Scholar
  8. Cooper, Helen. 1996. Oxford Guides to Chaucer: The Canterbury Tales. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Crocker, Holly A. 2003. Performative Passivity and Fantasies of Masculinity in the Merchant’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 38 (2): 178–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. David, Alfred. 1976. The Strumpet Muse: Art and Morals in Chaucer’s Poetry. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Donaldson, E.T. 1970a. The Effect of the Merchant’s Tale. In Speaking of Chaucer, 30–45. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  12. ———. 1970b. The Masculine Narrator and Four Women of Style. In Speaking of Chaucer, 46–64. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  13. Edwards, A.S.G. 1990. The Merchant’s Tale and Moral Chaucer. Modern Language Quarterly 51 (3): 409–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ellis, Deborah S. 1990. The Merchant’s Wife’s Tale: Language, Sex, and Commerce in Margery Kempe and in Chaucer. Exemplaria 2 (2): 595–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Everest, Carol. 1995. “Paradys or Helle”: Pleasure and Procreation in Chaucer’s “Merchant’s Tale”. In Sovereign Lady: Essays on Women in Middle English Literature, 63–84. New York: Garland Pub.Google Scholar
  16. ———. 1998. Sight and Sexual performance in the Merchant’s Tale. In Masculinities in Chaucer: Approaches to Maleness in the Canterbury Tales and Troilus and Criseyde, ed. Peter G. Beidler, 91–104. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  17. Finlayson, John. 2003. The Merchant’s Tale: Literary Contexts, the Play of Genres, and Institutionalized Sexual Relations. Anglia 121 (4): 557–580.Google Scholar
  18. Gust, Geoffrey W. 2009. Constructing Chaucer: Author and Autofiction in the Critical Tradition. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrington, Norman T. 1971. Chaucer’s Merchant’s Tale: Another Swing of the Pendulum. PMLA 86 (1): 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hines, John. 1993. The Fabliau in English. London and New York: Longman.Google Scholar
  21. Kipnis, Laura. 1993. (Male) Desire and (Female) Disgust: Reading Hustler. In Ecstasy Unlimited: On Sex, Capital, Gender, and Aesthetics, 219–241. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  22. Kohler, Michelle. 2004. Vision, Logic, and the Comic Production of Reality in the Merchant’s Tale and Two French Fabliaux. The Chaucer Review 39 (2): 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kolve, V.A. 2009. Telling Images: Chaucer and the Imagery of Narrative II. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. The Literary Context of Chaucer’s Fabliaux: Texts and Translations. 1971. Edited by Larry D. Benson and Theodore M. Andersson. New York: The Bobbs-Merrill Company, Inc.Google Scholar
  25. Mulvey, Laura. 1989. Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. In Visual and Other Pleasures, 14–30. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Niebrzydowski, Sue. 2007. “So wel koude he me glose”: The Wife of Bath and the Eroticism of Touch. In The Erotic in the Literature of Medieval Britain, ed. Amanda Hopkins and Cory James Rushton, 18–26. Cambridge: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  27. Nolan, Barbara. 1999. Promiscuous Fictions: Medieval Bawdy Tales and Their Textual Liaisons. In The Body and the Soul in Medieval Literature, ed. Piero Boitani and Anna Torti, 79–105. Cambridge, UK: D.S. Brewer.Google Scholar
  28. Pearcy, Roy J. 1986. The Genre of Chaucer’s Fabliau-Tales. In Chaucer and the Craft of Fiction, ed. Leigh A. Arrathoon, 329–384. Rochester, MI: Solaris Press, Inc.Google Scholar
  29. Pearsall, Derek. 1985. The Canterbury Tales. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Phillips, Helen. 2000. An Introduction to the Canterbury Tales: Reading, Fiction, Context. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  31. Pugh, Tison. 2004. Queering Medieval Genres. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  32. Richardson, Janette. 1970. Blameth Nat Me: A Study of Imagery in Chaucer’s Fabliaux. The Hague: Mouton & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. The Riverside Chaucer. 1987. Edited by Larry D. Benson. 3rd ed. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  34. Seal, Samantha Katz. 2014. Pregnant Desire: Eyes and Appetites in the Merchant’s Tale. The Chaucer Review 48 (3): 284–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Spearing, A.C. 1993. The Medieval Poet as Voyeur: Looking and Listening in Medieval Love Narratives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stewart, Douglas J. 1977. Pornography, Obscenity, and Capitalism. The Antioch Review 35 (4): 389–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Geoffrey W. Gust
    • 1
  1. 1.School of General StudiesStockton UniversityGallowayUSA

Personalised recommendations