Skip to main content

Secondhand Toxins

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Particles in the Air
  • 518 Accesses

Abstract

With the cause and effect between smoking and adverse health outcomes, including lung cancer, well established, by the latter part of the twentieth century, attention turned to breathing secondhand smoke. Secondhand smoke is what comes off the cigarette and is also breathed out of the smoker’s mouth. It was logical that secondhand smoke might be bad for the health of those who breathed it in, but scientific research was needed to support policy initiatives to reduce exposure and risk. A Japanese researcher published one of the first studies and the one that became high profile. His work, like the evidence against direct smoking, was attacked by the industry. Another line of research assumed that based on studies of the hazards of constituents of tobacco smoke, that it was a hazard. This line of thinking led to quantitative risk estimates. The dynamic tension between industry arguments and those of leading researchers reveals the complex issues surrounding uncertainty and doubt in the face of making policy decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wynder E. In memorium: Takeshi Hirayama: January 1, 1923—October 26, 1995. Nutr Cancer. 1996;25(2):218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Watanabe S. Takeshi Hirayama. Br Med J. 1995;311(7017):1429.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hong MK, Bero LA. How the tobacco industry responded to an influential study of the health effects of secondhand smoke. BMJ. 2002;325(7377):1413–6. Accessible at: http://www.bmj.com/content/325/7377/1413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee PN. “Marriage to a smoker” may not be a valid marker of exposure in studies relating environmental tobacco smoke to risk of lung cancer in Japanese non-smoking women. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 1995;67(5):287–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kawachi I, Colditz GA. Invited commentary: confounding, measurement error, and publication bias in studies of passive smoking. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(10):909–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Pirkle JL, Flegal KM, Bernert JT, Brody DJ, Etzel RA, Maurer KR. Exposure of the US population to environmental tobacco smoke: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988 to 1991. JAMA. 1996;275(16):1233–40. Accessible at: https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/401009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Repace J. Global overview on exposure to secondhand smoke. Presentation presented at the 12th World Conference on Tobacco or Health, Helsinki; 2003.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Repace JL, Lowrey AH. Indoor air pollution, tobacco smoke, and public health. Science. 1980;208(4443):464–72. Accessible at: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/208/4443/464/tab-pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Repace JL, Lowrey AH. A quantitative estimate of nonsmokers’ lung cancer risk from passive smoking. Environ Int. 1985;11(1):3–22. Accessible at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0160412085900984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Oberg M, Jaakkola MS, Woodward A, Peruga A, Pruss-Ustun A. Worldwide burden of disease from exposure to second-hand smoke: a retrospective analysis of data from 192 countries. Lancet. 2011;377(9760):139–46. Accessible at: http://www.who.int/quantifying_ehimpacts/publications/smoking.pdf.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pope CA 3rd, Burnett RT, Turner MC, et al. Lung cancer and cardiovascular disease mortality associated with ambient air pollution and cigarette smoke: shape of the exposure-response relationships. Environ Health Perspect. 2011;119(11):1616–21. Accessible at: https://ehp.niehs.nih.gov/1103639/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pope CA 3rd, Burnett RT, Krewski D, et al. Cardiovascular mortality and exposure to airborne fine particulate matter and cigarette smoke: shape of the exposure-response relationship. Circulation. 2009;120(11):941–8. Accessible at: http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/120/11/941.long.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhong L, Goldberg MS, Parent ME, Hanley JA. Exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and the risk of lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Lung Cancer. 2000;27(1):3–18. Accessible at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500299000938?via%3Dihub.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hackshaw A, Morris JK, Boniface S, Tang JL, Milenković D. Low cigarette consumption and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke: meta-analysis of 141 cohort studies in 55 study reports. BMJ. 2018;360:j5855.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Repace JL, Lowrey AH. An indoor air quality standard for ambient tobacco smoke based on carcinogenic risk. N Y State J Med. 1985;85(7):381–3.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Johnson A. Study: air worse in smoky bars than on truck-choked roads. Associated Press; 2004. Accessible at: http://www.newson6.com/story/7721196/study-air-worse-in-smoky-bars-than-on-truck-choked-roads.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Brugge, D. (2018). Secondhand Toxins. In: Particles in the Air. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89587-1_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics