Advertisement

Pleasure as the Heart of Poetry and Knowledge: Lucretius

  • John G. Fitch
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Literature, Science and Medicine book series (PLSM)

Abstract

Echoing Wordsworth, this chapter advances the view that pleasure is the shared heart of poetry and science. The chapter shows, with examples from Lucretius’ poem On the Nature of Things (De Rerum Natura), how the pleasure of understanding is appropriately allied with the pleasurable resources of language as deployed by a master poet. As Michel Serres, Stephen Greenblatt and Duncan Kennedy have done, it regards Lucretius’ poem as a central text for considering the relationship between poetry and knowledge.

Keywords

Pleasure Lucretius Atomism Word-play Greenblatt Barthes 

References

  1. Barthes, Roland. 1973. Le Plaisir du Texte. Paris: Seuil. Translated as The Pleasure of the Text. 1975. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
  2. Copley, Frank O., trans. 1977. Lucretius: The Nature of Things. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  3. Deutsch, Rosamund C. 1939. The Pattern of Sound in Lucretius. Philadelphia: Bryn Mawr.Google Scholar
  4. Greenblatt, Stephen J. 2011. The Swerve: How the World Became Modern. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
  5. Humphries, Rolfe, trans. 1969. Lucretius: The Way Things Are. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Kennedy, Duncan F. 2002. Rethinking Reality: Lucretius and the Textualization of Nature. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Serres, Michel. 1977. La naissance de la physique dans le texte de Lucrèce: Fleuves et turbulences. Paris: Minuet. English translation: 2000. The Birth of Physics. Manchester: Clinamen. Google Scholar
  8. Smith, Martin Ferguson. 1982. Lucretius, De Rerum Natura, trans. W.H.D. Rouse and rev. M.F. Smith, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Snyder, Jane. 1980. Puns and Poetry in Lucretius’ De Rerum Natura. Amsterdam: B.R. Grüner.Google Scholar
  10. West, David. 1975. Lucretius’ Methods of Argument (3.417–614). Classical Quarterly 25: 94–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of VictoriaVictoriaCanada

Personalised recommendations