Skip to main content

To Treat or Not to Treat: Early Withdrawal of Therapy and the Limits of Prognostic Ability

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Controversies in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Management

Abstract

The development of computed tomography (CT), simple classifications of the severity of traumatic brain injury such as the Glasgow Coma Scale, monitoring of intracranial pressure, and the concept of prevention of secondary brain injury have helped advance the ability to prognosticate and improve outcomes after traumatic brain injury. However, the art of determining prognosis after severe traumatic brain injury remains imprecise in many situations, leading to controversy over which patients may benefit from aggressive treatment and which patients may suffer futile outcomes despite intervention. A 2005 survey found that 80% of physicians thought that an accurate prognostic assessment was required for decisions on whether or not to withdraw treatment, but only around a third felt that they could accurately assess prognosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Marshall LF. Head injury: recent past, present, and future. Neurosurgery. 2000;47(3):546–61.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Perel P, Wasserberg J, Ravi RR, Shakur H, Edwards P, Roberts I. Prognosis following head injury: a survey of doctors from developing and developed countries. J Eval Clin Pract. 2007;13(3):464–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Roozenbeek B, Lingsma HF, Lecky FE, Lu J, Weir J, Butcher I, et al. Prediction of outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: external validation of the international mission on prognosis and analysis of clinical trials (impact) and corticoid randomisation after significant head injury (crash) prognostic models. Crit Care Med. 2012;40(5):1609–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. McMillan TM, Herbert CM. Further recovery in a potential treatment withdrawal case 10 years after brain injury. Brain Inj. 2004;18(9):935–40.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Jacobs LM, Burns K, Bennett Jacobs B. Trauma death: views of the public and trauma professionals on death and dying from injuries. Arch Surg. 2008;143(8):730–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Simard JF, Scales DC, Burns KE, Moore L, et al. Mortality associated with withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a Canadian multicentre cohort study. CMAJ. 2011;183(14):1581–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cote N, Turgeon AF, Lauzier F, Moore L, Scales DC, Bernard F, et al. Factors associated with the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter cohort study. Neurocrit Care. 2013;18(1):154–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Becker KJ, Baxter AB, Cohen WA, Bybee HM, Tirschwell DL, Newell DW, et al. Withdrawal of support in intracerebral hemorrhage may lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Neurology. 2001;56(6):766–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Livingston DH, Mosenthal AC. Withdrawing life-sustaining therapy for patients with severe traumatic brain injury. CMAJ. 2011;183(14):1570–1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Keenan SP, Busche KD, Chen LM, Esmail R, Inman KJ, Sibbald WJ. Withdrawal and withholding of life support in the intensive care unit: a comparison of teaching and community hospitals. The southwestern ontario critical care research network. Crit Care Med. 1998;26(2):245–51.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. McCredie VA, Alali AS, Xiong W, Rubenfeld GD, Cuthbertson BH, Scales DC, et al. Timing of withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies in severe traumatic brain injury: impact on overall mortality. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016;80(3):484–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. White DB, Ernecoff N, Buddadhumaruk P, Hong S, Weissfeld L, Curtis R, et al. Prognosis Between Physicians and Surrogate Decision Makers of Critically Ill Patients. JAMA. 2016;315(19):2086–94.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Izzy S, Compton R, Carandang R, Hall W, Muehlschlegel S. Self-fulfilling prophecies through withdrawal of care: do they exist in traumatic brain injury, too? Neurocrit Care. 2013;19(3):347–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bonds BW, Dhanda A, Wade C, Massetti J, Diaz C, Stein DM. Prognostication of Mortality and Long term Functional Outcomes Following Traumatic Brain Injury: Can We Do Better? J Neurotrauma. 2015. EPublication ahead of print.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rivara FP, Koepsell TD, Wang J, Temkin N, Dorsch A, Vavilala MS, et al. Disability 3, 12, and 24 months after traumatic brain injury among children and adolescents. Pediatrics. 2011;128(5):e1129–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jagannathan J, Okonkwo DO, Dumont AS, Ahmed H, Bahari A, Prevedello DM, et al. Outcome following decompressive craniectomy in children with severe traumatic brain injury: a 10-year single-center experience with long-term follow up. J Neurosurg. 2007;106(4 Suppl):268–75.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Andelic N, Hammergren N, Bautz-Holter E, Sveen U, Brunborg C, Roe C. Functional outcome and health-related quality of life 10 years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. Acta Neurol Scand. 2009;120(1):16–23.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Andelic N, Bautz-Holter E, Ronning P, Olafsen K, Sigurdardottir S, Schanke AK, et al. Does an early onset and continuous chain of rehabilitation improve the long-term functional outcome of patients with severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurotrauma. 2012;29(1):66–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgalla MH, Will BE, Roser F, Tatagiba M. Do long-term results justify decompressive craniectomy after severe traumatic brain injury? J Neurosurg. 2008;109(4):685–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Poon WS, Zhu XL, Ng SC, Wong GK. Predicting one year clinical outcome in traumatic brain injury (TBI) at the beginning of rehabilitation. Acta Neurochir Suppl. 2005;93:207–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Scholten AC, Haagsma JA, Andriessen TM, Vos PE, Steyerberg EW, van Beeck EF, et al. Health-related quality of life after mild, moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: patterns and predictors of suboptimal functioning during the first year after injury. Injury. 2015;46(4):616–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. LeBlanc J, de Guise E, Gosselin N, Feyz M. Comparison of functional outcome following acute care in young, middle-aged and elderly patients with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2006;20(8):779–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kouloulas EJ, Papadeas AG, Michail X, Sakas DE, Boviatsis EJ. Prognostic value of time-related Glasgow coma scale components in severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective evaluation with respect to 1-year survival and functional outcome. Int J Rehabil Res. 2013;36(3):260–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Badri S, Chen J, Barber J, Temkin NR, Dikmen SS, Chesnut RM, et al. Mortality and long-term functional outcome associated with intracranial pressure after traumatic brain injury. Intensive Care Med. 2012;38(11):1800–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. King JT Jr, Carlier PM, Marion DW. Early Glasgow outcome scale scores predict long-term functional outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma. 2005;22(9):947–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Whitlock JA Jr, Hamilton BB. Functional outcome after rehabilitation for severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;76(12):1103–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Maas AI, Steyerberg EW, Butcher I, Dammers R, Lu J, Marmarou A, et al. Prognostic value of computerized tomography scan characteristics in traumatic brain injury: results from the impact study. J Neurotrauma. 2007;24(2):303–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Maas AI, Hukkelhoven CW, Marshall LF, Steyerberg EW. Prediction of outcome in traumatic brain injury with computed tomographic characteristics: a comparison between the computed tomographic classification and combinations of computed tomographic predictors. Neurosurgery. 2005;57(6):1173–82; discussion 1173–1182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marshall LF, Toole BM, Bowers SA. The national traumatic coma data bank. Part 2: patients who talk and deteriorate: implications for treatment. J Neurosurg. 1983;59(2):285–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Huisman TA, Schwamm LH, Schaefer PW, Koroshetz WJ, Shetty-Alva N, Ozsunar Y, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2004;25(3):370–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Tong KA, Ashwal S, Holshouser BA, Nickerson JP, Wall CJ, Shutter LA, et al. Diffuse axonal injury in children: clinical correlation with hemorrhagic lesions. Ann Neurol. 2004;56(1):36–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Schaefer PW, Huisman TA, Sorensen AG, Gonzalez RG, Schwamm LH. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in closed head injury: high correlation with initial Glasgow coma scale score and score on modified Rankin scale at discharge. Radiology. 2004;233(1):58–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Sandsmark DK, Kumar MA, Woodward CS, Schmitt SE, Park S, Lim MM. Sleep features on continuous electroencephalography predict rehabilitation outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31(2):101–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bagnato S, Boccagni C, Prestandrea C, Sant'Angelo A, Castiglione A, Galardi G. Prognostic value of standard EEG in traumatic and non-traumatic disorders of consciousness following coma. Clin Neurophysiol. 2010;121(3):274–80.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Chen R, Bolton CF, Young B. Prediction of outcome in patients with anoxic coma: a clinical and electrophysiologic study. Crit Care Med. 1996;24(4):672–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Freeman WD, Barrett KM, Freeman ML, Johnson M, Divertie G, Rossetti AO, et al. Predictors of awakening from postanoxic status epilepticus after therapeutic hypothermia. Neurology. 2009;73(18):1512; author reply 1512–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Geocadin RG, Buitrago MM, Torbey MT, Chandra-Strobos N, Williams MA, Kaplan PW. Neurologic prognosis and withdrawal of life support after resuscitation from cardiac arrest. Neurology. 2006;67(1):105–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Hartings JA, Bullock MR, Okonkwo DO, Murray LS, Murray GD, Fabricius M, et al. Spreading depolarisations and outcome after traumatic brain injury: a prospective observational study. Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(12):1058–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hartings JA, Watanabe T, Bullock MR, Okonkwo DO, Fabricius M, Woitzik J, et al. Spreading depolarizations have prolonged direct current shifts and are associated with poor outcome in brain trauma. Brain. 2011;134(Pt 5):1529–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tsurukiri J, Nagata K, Hoshiai A, Oomura T, Jimbo H, Ikeda Y. Middle latency auditory-evoked potential index monitoring of cerebral function to predict functional outcome after emergency craniotomy in patients with brain damage. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015;23:80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Bosco E, Zanatta P, Ponzin D, Marton E, Feletti A, Scarpa B, et al. Prognostic value of somatosensory-evoked potentials and CT scan evaluation in acute traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2014;26(4):299–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Amantini A, Grippo A, Fossi S, Cesaretti C, Piccioli A, Peris A, et al. Prediction of ‘awakening’ and outcome in prolonged acute coma from severe traumatic brain injury: evidence for validity of short latency seps. Clin Neurophysiol. 2005;116(1):229–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Gutling E, Gonser A, Imhof HG, Landis T. EEG reactivity in the prognosis of severe head injury. Neurology. 1995;45(5):915–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Fischer C, Mutschler V. [Traumatic brain injuries in adults: from coma to wakefulness. Neurophysiological data]. Ann Readapt Med Phys. 2002;45(8):448–55.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Geoffrey T. Manley MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, Y., Ordaz, A., Huang, M., Manley, G.T. (2018). To Treat or Not to Treat: Early Withdrawal of Therapy and the Limits of Prognostic Ability. In: Timmons, S. (eds) Controversies in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89477-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89477-5_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-89476-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-89477-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics