Do Smart Cities Really Provide Opportunities for Citizen Participation? A Case Study of the RECI Cities in Spain (2017)

  • Enrique José Varela-ÁlvaresEmail author
  • Xosé María Mahou-Lago
  • Mónica López Viso
Part of the Public Administration and Information Technology book series (PAIT, volume 34)


The authors have developed a framework for systemic analysis and multi-disciplinary methodology that has made it possible to understand the outcomes of the implementation process for the urban centers included in the Spanish Network of Smart Cities (RECI). Starting with the research question, “Do Smart Cities really provide opportunities for citizen participation?”, we sought to discover how participation mechanisms on the Madrid and Barcelona city government web portals have evolved and how their development has been affected by changes in political leadership. We also compared participation mechanisms in the two smaller cities of Guadalajara and Huesca in relation to the political parties that are currently governing them. The main hypothesis is that Smart Cities should include various mechanisms for e-participation on their websites that make it possible to know how citizens want to personalize services (citizen centricity) and how to improve empowerment through citizen-administration dialogue processes (citizen engagement). Using these methods of analysis, we confirmed that the Smart Cities model had been consolidated on the web portals of the large cities and their participation mechanisms had increased. Meanwhile, in the two smaller cities, the Smart Cities model was being implemented at different “speeds”, depending on the territorial and political context.


Citizen participation e-Participation RECI smart cities Heuristic test Web portals 


  1. Alonso, R. G., & Lippez-De Castro, S. (2016). Technology helps, people make: A smart city governance framework grounded in deliberative democracy. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (pp. 333–347). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Berntzen, L., & Johannessen, M. R. (2016). The role of citizen participation in municipal smart city projects: Lessons learned from Norway. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (pp. 299–314). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouzas, R., & Mahou, X. (2013). The study of the functionality of government portals. A methodological proposal from the e-health. Gestión y Política Pública, 22, 261–308.Google Scholar
  4. Chourabi, H., Gil-García, J. R., Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., Melloili, S., Scholl, H. J., et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. In 45th Hawaii international conference on system sciences. IEEE. Retrieved January 15, 2014.
  5. Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2001). New Public Management: The effects of contractualism and devolution on political control. Public Management Review, 3(1), 73–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2007). The whole of government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2012). Competing principles of agency organization—The reorganization of reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(4), 579–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Christensen, T., & Laegreid, P. (2013). Contexts and administrative reforms: A transformative approach. In C. Pollitt (Ed.), Context in public policy and management. The missing link (pp. 131–156). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  9. Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gascó, M., Trivellato, B., & Cavenago, D. (2016). How do southern European cities foster innovation? Lessons from the experience of the smart city approaches of Barcelona and Milan. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (pp. 191–206). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Centre of Regional Science, Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
  12. Gil-Garcia, J. R., Zhang, J., & Puron-Cid, G. (2016). Conceptualizing smartness in government: An integrative and multi-dimensional view. Government Information Quaterly, 33, 524. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. INE (2017). CRE base 2010 (1/4). Contabilidad Regional de España. Base 2010. Producto Interior Bruto regional. Año 2016, (Accessed 30 June 2017).
  14. Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Park, H. W., Swar, B., & Rho, J. J. (2010). A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: A scientometrics approach. Scientometrics, 87, 267–286. Retrieved January 15, 2014. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mahou-Lago, X. M., & Varela-Álvarez, E. J. (2016). Innovation and opportunities for citizen participation in Spanish smart cities. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (pp. 367–392). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Meijer, A. (2016). Smart city governance: A local emergent perspective. In J. R. Gil-Garcia, T. A. Pardo, & T. Nam (Eds.), Smarter as the new urban agenda: A comprehensive view of the 21st century city (pp. 73–85). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011). Conceptualizing smart city with dimension of technology, people, and institutions. In The proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on digital government research (pp. 282–291). New York: ACM.Google Scholar
  18. OECD. (2017). Digital government explores how governments can best use information and communication technologies (ICTs) to embrace good government principles and achieve policy goals. Retrieved June 30, 2017, from
  19. Offe, C. (2016). Is there, or can there be, a “European society”? In C. Offe & U. K. PreuB (Eds.), Citizens in Europe. Essays on democracy, constitutionalism and European integration (pp. 283–299). Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  20. Offe, C., & PreuB, U. K. (2016). The problem of legitimacy in the European polity: Is democratisation the answer? In C. Offe & U. K. PreuB (Eds.), Citizens in Europe. Essays on democracy, constitutionalism and European integration (pp. 389–416). Colchester, UK: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pollitt, C. (Ed.). (2013). Context in public policy and management. The missing link. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  22. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2011). Continuity and change in public policy and management. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, Cheltenham: United Kingdom.Google Scholar
  23. Pollitt, C., Ferlie, E., & Lynn, L. E. (2007). The Oxford handbook of public management. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Ramió, C. (1999). Teoría de la Organización y Administración Pública. Barcelona: Tecnos & Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
  25. Sandoval-Almazan, R., & Gil-Garcia, J. R. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(S1), S72–S81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tormey, S., & Feenstra, R. A. (2015). Reinventing the political party in Spain: The case of 15M and the Spanish mobilisations. Policy Studies, 36(6), 590–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Torres, L., Pina, V., & Acerete, B. (2006). E-governance developments in EU cities: Reshaping government’s relationship with citizens. Governance, 19(2), 272–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Varela-Álvarez, E. J., de Araújo, J. F. F. E., & Gamarra, Ó. B. (2017). Civil service and the crisis: A comparative analysis of Iberian countries (2008–2013). In N. Schofield & G. Caballero (Eds.), State, institutions and democracy, studies in political economy (pp. 271–292). Cham: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Enrique José Varela-Álvares
    • 1
    Email author
  • Xosé María Mahou-Lago
    • 1
  • Mónica López Viso
    • 1
  1. 1.University of VigoPontevedraSpain

Personalised recommendations