Advertisement

The Monkey Question

  • Jan Lauwereyns
Chapter

Abstract

The use of monkeys in research represents a particular area of controversy. The chapter offers a critique of arguments typically offered in public debate. I note the weaknesses of retrospective thinking, the erroneous appeal to necessity, and the unfounded bias against working with human volunteers and rodents. The issues are illustrated via three scientific paradigms for which there exist valid alternatives: the development of a neural control system for robotic arm movement, the study of perceptual decision-making, and the study of the cognitive mechanisms underlying cocaine addiction and relapse. The three paradigms allow us to reflect on the opportunity cost neglect by individual researchers. Compromised by a conflict of interest, some researchers put forth misguided claims insisting on the irreplaceability of their preferred animal model.

Keywords

Animal Ethics Nonhuman primate Replacement Opportunity cost Conflict of interest 

References

  1. Abbot, A. (2010). The rat pack. Nature, 465, 282–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akrami, A., Kopec, C. D., Diamond, M. E., & Brody, C. D. (2018). Posterior parietal cortex represents sensory history and mediates its effects on behaviour. Nature, 554, 368–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amkreutz, R. (2013, November 21). KU Leuven start twee nieuwe dierproeven met apen [The University of Leuven starts two new animal experiments with monkeys]. De Morgen. Available at: https://www.demorgen.be/binnenland/ku-leuven-start-twee-nieuwe-dierproeven-met-apen-bc9e66ce/.
  4. Bailey, J., & Taylor, K. (2016). Non-human primates in neuroscience research: The case against its scientific necessity. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals, 44, 43–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Belloc, H. (1910). On Something. London: Methuen. Available at: http://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/7354/pg7354.txt.
  6. Bonazzi, L., Viaro, R., Lodi, E., Canto, R., Bonifazzi, C., & Franchi, G. (2013). Complex movement topography and extrinsic space representation in the rat forelimb motor cortex as defined by long-duration intracortical microstimulation. Journal of Neuroscience, 33, 2097–2107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brunton, B. W., Botvinick, M. M., & Brody, C. D. (2013). Rats and humans can optimally accumulate evidence for decision-making. Science, 340, 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Camus, S., Ko, W. K. D., Pioli, E., & Bezard, E. (2015). Why bother using non-human primate models of cognitive disorders in translational research? Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 124, 123–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cao, D. (2015). Animals in China: Law and Society. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capitanio, J. P., & Emborg, M. E. (2008). Contributions of non-human primates to neuroscience research. Lancet, 371, 1126–1135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chapin, J. K., Moxon, K. A., Markowitz, R. S., & Nicolelis, M. A. L. (1999). Real-time control of a robot arm using simultaneously recorded neurons in the motor cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 664–670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cheney, D. L., & Seyfarth, R. M. (2007). Baboon Metaphysics: The Evolution of a Social Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Conlee, K. M., & Rowan, A. N. (2012). The case for phasing out experiments on primates. Hastings Center Report, 42(suppl. 1), 31–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, T. (1787). Letters on the Slave Trade. Manchester: C. Wheeler.Google Scholar
  15. Cooper, T. (1835). Slavery. Southern Literary Journal, 1, 188–193.Google Scholar
  16. Cyranoski, D. (2016). Monkey kingdom. Nature, 532, 300–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Darwin, C. (1859). On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray. Available at: https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species_(1859).
  18. Editorial. (2010). Still prime time for primates. Nature, 465, 267.Google Scholar
  19. Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.). (1994). The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  20. Ghooi, R. B. (2011). The Nuremberg code: A critique. Perspectives in Clinical Research, 2, 72–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hanks, T. D., Kopec, C. D., Brunton, B. W., Duan, C. A., Erlich, J. C., & Brody, C. D. (2015). Distinct relationships of parietal and prefrontal cortices to evidence accumulation. Nature, 520, 220–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hochberg, L. R., Bacher, D., Jarosiewicz, B., Masse, N. Y., Simeral, J. D., Vogel, J., et al. (2012). Reach and grasp by people with tetraplegia using a neurally controlled robotic arm. Nature, 485, 372–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hochberg, L. R., Serruya, M. D., Friehs, G. M., Mukand, J. A., Saleh, M., Caplan, A. H., et al. (2006). Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature, 442, 164–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Janssen, P., Vanduffel, W., Vogels, R., & D’Hooghe, T. (2014, December 3). Research projects involving primates at KU Leuven: What, how and why? Invited Talk at the Symposium and Debate on Non-human Primates in Biomedical Research: Science Versus Public Opinion? Belgium: University of Leuven.Google Scholar
  25. Kaplan, T., Weiland, N., & Shear, M. D. (2018, January 14). Hopes dim for DACA deal as lawmakers battle over Trump’s immigration remarks. The New York Times. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/01/14/us/politics/david-perdue-trump-shithole.html.
  26. Kilbride, D. (1993). Slavery and utilitarianism: Thomas Cooper and the mind of the Old South. The Journal of Southern History, 59, 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lauwereyns, J. (2010). The Anatomy of Bias: How Neural Circuits Weigh the Options. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lauwereyns, J. (2012). Brain and the Gaze: On the Active Boundaries of Vision. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  29. Lauwereyns, J. (2014, December 3). Diminishing returns, increasing costs: Time for a paradigm shift? Invited Talk at the Symposium and Debate on Non-human Primates in Biomedical Research: Science Versus Public Opinion? Belgium: University of Leuven.Google Scholar
  30. Lauwereyns, J., & Wisnewski, R. G. (2006). A reaction-time paradigm to measure reward-oriented bias in rats. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 32, 467–473.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Lauwereyns, J., Sakagami, M., Tsutsui, K., Kobayashi, S., Koizumi, M., & Hikosaka, O. (2001). Responses to task-irrelevant visual features by primate prefrontal neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 86, 2001–2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lauwereyns, J., Takikawa, Y., Kawagoe, R., Kobayashi, S., Koizumi, M., Coe, B., et al. (2002a). Feature-based anticipation of cues that predict reward in monkey caudate nucleus. Neuron, 33, 463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lauwereyns, J., Watanabe, K., Coe, B., & Hikosaka, O. (2002b). A neural correlate of response bias in monkey caudate nucleus. Nature, 418, 413–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Licata, A. M., Kaufman, M. T., Raposo, D., Ryan, M. B., Sheppard, J. P., & Churchland, A. K. (2017). Posterior parietal cortex guides visual decisions in rats. Journal of Neuroscience, 37, 4954–4966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mandeville, J. B., Choi, J.-K., Jarraya, B., Rosen, B. R., Jenkins, B. G., & Vanduffel, W. (2011). fMRI of cocaine self-administration in macaques reveals functional inhibition of basal ganglia. Neuropsychopharmacology, 36, 1187–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mason, J. B. (2017). Misothery: Contempt for animals and nature, its origins, purposes, and repercussions. In L. Kalof (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Animal Studies (pp. 135–151). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Nelissen, K., Jarraya, B., Arsenault, J. T., Rosen, B. R., Wald, L. L., Mandeville, J. B., et al. (2012). Neural correlates of the formation and retention of cocaine-induced stimulus-reward associations. Biological Psychiatry, 72, 422–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nicolelis, M. A. L., Baccala, L. A., Lin, R. C. S., & Chapin, J. K. (1995). Sensorimotor encoding by synchronous neural ensemble activity at multiple levels of the somatosensory system. Science, 268, 1353–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Nuernberg Military Tribunals. (1949). Trials of War Criminals Before the Nuernberg Military Tribunals Under Control Council Law No. 10, Volume II. Nuernberg: Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  40. Papale, A. E., Zielinski, M. C., Frank, L. M., Jadhav, S. P., & Redish, A. D. (2016). Interplay between hippocampal sharp-wave-ripple events and vicarious trial and error behaviors in decision making. Neuron, 92, 975–982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Phillips, K. A., Bales, K. L., Capitanio, J. P., Conley, A., Czoty, P. W., ‘t Hart, B. A., et al. (2014). Why primate models matter. American Journal of Primatology, 76, 801–824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Quigley, M. (2007). Non-human primates: The appropriate subjects of biomedical research? Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 655–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Raposo, D., Kaufman, M. T., & Churchland, A. K. (2014). A category-free neural population supports evolving demands during decision-making. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 1784–1792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Raposo, D., Sheppard, J. P., Schrater, P. R., & Churchland, A. K. (2012). Multisensory decision-making in rats and humans. Journal of Neuroscience, 32, 3726–3735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Redish, A. D. (2016). Vicarious trial and error. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 17, 147–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Roelfsema, P. R., & Treue, S. (2014). Basic neuroscience research with nonhuman primates: A small but indispensable component of biomedical research. Neuron, 82, 1200–1204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ruse, M. (2003). Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Russell, W. M. S., & Burch, R. L. (1959/1992). The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. Wheathampstead: Universities Federation for Animal Welfare. Available at: ALTWEB http://altweb.jhsph.edu/pubs/books/humane_exp/foreword.
  49. Sanos, S. (2013). The Aesthetics of Hate: Far-Right Intellectuals, Antisemitism, and Gender in 1930s France. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Shepard, P. (1978). Thinking Animals: Animals and the Development of Human Intelligence. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
  51. Shuster, E. (1998). The Nuremberg code: Hippocratic ethics and human rights. Lancet, 351, 974–977.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Steiner, A. P., & Redish, A. D. (2014). Behavioral and neurophysiological correlates of regret in rat decision-making on a neuroeconomic task. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 995–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Takahashi, M., Lauwereyns, J., Sakurai, Y., & Tsukada, M. (2009). Behavioral state-dependent episodic representations in hippocampal CA1 neuronal activity during spatial alternation. Cognitive Neurodynamics, 3, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Takahashi, M., Nishida, H., Redish, A. D., & Lauwereyns, J. (2014). Theta phase shift in spike timing and modulation of gamma oscillation: A dynamic code for spatial alternation during fixation in rat hippocampal area CA1. Journal of Neurophysiology, 111, 1601–1614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van de Perre, K. (2013, June 5). Protest tegen Leuvens cocaïne-experiment op apen [Protest against Leuven cocaine experiment on monkeys]. De Morgen. Available at: https://www.demorgen.be/binnenland/protest-tegen-leuvens-cocaine-experiment-op-apen-bf87e368/.
  56. Velliste, M., Perel, S., Spalding, M. C., Whitford, A. S., & Schwartz, A. B. (2008). Cortical control of a prosthetic arm for self-feeding. Nature, 453, 1098–1101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wessberg, J., Stambaugh, C. R., Kralik, J. D., Beck, P. D., Laubach, M., Chapin, J. K., et al. (2000). Real-time prediction of hand trajectory by ensembles of cortical neurons in primates. Nature, 408, 361–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. World Medical Association. (2013). Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310, 2191–2194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yartsev, M. M. (2017). The emperor’s new wardrobe: Rebalancing diversity of animal models in neuroscience research. Science, 358, 466–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhou, Q. (2014). Balancing the welfare: The use of non-human primates in research. Trends in Genetics, 30, 476–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Kyushu UniversityFukuokaJapan

Personalised recommendations