Skip to main content

Core Build-Ups and Post Placement

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Extra-Coronal Restorations

Part of the book series: BDJ Clinician’s Guides ((BDJCG))

Abstract

This part of the chapter will emphasise the need to:

  • Distinguish between a core build-up acting simply as a space-filler or forming a substructure for the extra-coronal restoration.

  • Replace existing restorations, so what remains of a tooth can be properly assessed.

  • Be aware of tooth restorability indices, but use your own clinical judgement to decide which teeth can be reliably restored.

  • Decide if the extra-coronal restoration might be better bonded directly to the tooth without a core build-up.

  • Choose an appropriate core build-up material, prepare features in teeth to aid retention and employ appropriate adhesive bonding.

  • Ensure the extra-coronal restoration is extended sufficiently onto sound tooth beyond the core build-up to give a “ferrule effect”.

This chapter is in two parts: The first considers core build-ups in vital teeth as a foundation for extra-coronal restorations. The second part considers the practicalities of engaging with an increasing variety of options for restoring root-treated teeth focusing on core build-ups, the use of posts, and cast posts and cores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. The glossary of prosthodontic terms 9th Ed. J Prosthet Dent. 2017;117(5S):1–105.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Christensen GJ. When to use fillers, build-ups or posts and cores. J Am Dent Assoc. 1996;127:1397–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy F, McDonald A, Petrie A, Palmer G, Setchell D. Coronal tooth structure in root-treated teeth prepared for complete and partial coverage restorations. J Oral Rehabil. 2009;36:451–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nayyar A, Walton RE, Leonard LA. An amalgam coronal-radicular dowel and core technique for endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:511–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Padbury A Jr, Eber R, Wang HL. Interactions between the gingiva and the margin of restorations. J Clin Periodontol. 2003;30:379–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. McDonald A, Setchell D. Developing a tooth restorability index. Dent Update. 2005;32:343–4, 346–348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bandlish RB, McDonald AV, Setchell DJ. Assessment of the amount of remaining coronal dentine in root-treated teeth. J Dent. 2006;34:699–708.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawood A, Patel S. The dental practicality index—assessing the restorability of teeth. Br Dent J. 2017;222:755–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. British Dental Association: The Minamata Convention on mercury. [cited June 2017]. Available from: http://tinyurl.com/yanbhhpo.

  10. Moraschini V, Fai CK, Alto RM, Dos Santos GO. Amalgam and resin composite longevity of posterior restorations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Dent. 2015;43:1043–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Cho GC, Kaneko LM, Donovan TE, White SN. Diametral and compressive strength of dental core materials. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;82:272–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aksornmuang J, Nakajima M, Foxton RM, Tagami J. Mechanical properties and bond strength of dual-cure resin composites to root canal dentin. Dent Mater. 2007;23:226–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Schmage P, Cakir FY, Nergiz I, Selcuk S, Pfeiffer P. Retentive force of FRC posts inserted with core build-up composites and resin cements. J Adhes Sci Technol. 2011;25:2023–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kovarik RE, Breeding LC, Caughman WF. Fatigue life of three core materials under simulated chewing conditions. J Prosthet Dent. 1992;68:584–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Haller B, Gotze W, Weiss G. Parapulpal pins and their effects on the fracture-resistance of pin-retained cores. J Oral Rehabil. 1991;18:459–69.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kumar G, Shivrayan A. Comparative study of mechanical properties of direct core build-up materials. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015;6:16–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bresciani E, Barata Tde J, Fagundes TC, Adachi A, Terrin MM, Navarro MF. Compressive and diametral tensile strength of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2004;12:344–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. DeWald JP, Arcoria CJ, Ferracane JL. Evaluation of glass-cermet cores under cast crowns. Dent Mater. 1990;6:129–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kerby RE, Knobloch L, Thakur A. Strength properties of visible-light-cured resin-modified glass-ionomer cements. Oper Dent. 1997;22:79–83.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 3M Vitremer Core Build-up/Restorative: Instructions for use. [cited June 2017]. Available from: http://tinyurl.com/yccf9dld.

  21. Wilson NHF, Cowan AJ, Crisp RJ, Wilson MA. A short-term clinical evaluation of a tricure glass-ionomer system as a transitional restoration and core buildup material. Quintessence Int. 1999;30:405–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cowan AJ, Wilson IM, Wilson NHF. Cores and luting using a tricure glass-ionomer system: five-year findings. J Dent Res. 2002;81:A326.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Sindel J, Frankenberger R, Kramer N, Petschelt A. Crack formation of all-ceramic crowns dependent on different core build-up and luting materials. J Dent. 1999;27:175–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dentsply: Dyract XTRA the caries preventing restorative. Instructions for use. [cited June 2017]. Available from: http://tinyurl.com/ybyfkanf.

  25. Newsome PR, Youngson CC. Complications of pin placement. A survey of 429 cases. Br Dent J. 1987;163:375–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bonsor SJ. Are dentine pins obsolete? Dent Update. 2013;40:253–4, 256–258.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shillingburg HT Jr, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Preparation modifications for damaged vital posterior teeth. Dent Clin N Am. 1985;29:305–26.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Newsome PR. Slot retention: an alternative to pins in the large amalgam restoration. Dent Update. 1988;15(202):204–7.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Outhwaite WC, Garman TA, Pashley DH. Pin vs. slot retention in extensive amalgam restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 1979;41:396–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pashley EL, Comer RW, Parry EE, Pashley DH. Amalgam buildups: shear strength and dentin sealing properties. Oper Dent. 1991;16:82–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Garman TA, Outhwaite WC, Hawkins IK, Smith CD. A clinical comparison of dentinal slot retention with metallic pin retention. J Am Dent Assoc. 1983;107:762–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Tewari S, Govila CP, Paharia YN. A clinical evaluation of dentinal slot, amalgapin & T.M.S. retention in amalgam restorations. Fed Oper Dent. 1990;1:14–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Felton DA, Webb EL, Kanoy BE, Cox CF. Pulpal response to threaded pin and retentive slot techniques: a pilot investigation. J Prosthet Dent. 1991;66:597–602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Johnson CN. The American textbook of operative dentistry. Philadelphia: P. Blakison’s Son & Co.; 1915.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Ottolengui R. Methods of filling teeth. 2nd ed. London: Claudius Ash & Sons Limited; 1899. p. 112.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Vale WA. Everyday procedures in dentistry—abutment preparations for fixed bridgework. Br Dent J. 1953;94:93–8.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Aboush YE, Jenkins CB. The bonding of glass-ionomer cements to dental amalgam. Br Dent J. 1989;166:255–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Aboush YE, Elderton RJ. Bonding of a light-curing glass-ionomer cement to dental amalgam. Dent Mater. 1991;7:130–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. al-Moayad M, Aboush YE, Elderton RJ. Bonded amalgam restorations: a comparative study of glass-ionomer and resin adhesives. Br Dent J. 1993;175:363–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chen RS, Liu CC, Cheng MR, Lin CP. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Oper Dent. 2000;25:411–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Welbury RR, Murray JJ. A clinical trial of the glass-ionomer cement-composite resin “sandwich” technique in class II cavities in permanent premolar and molar teeth. Quintessence Int. 1990;21:507–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Motisuki C, Monti Lima L, Emi Sanabe M, Jacques P, Santos-Pinto L. Evaluation of the microtensile bond strength of composite resin restoration in dentin prepared with different sizes of aluminum oxide particles, using the air abrasion system. Minerva Stomatol. 2006;55:611–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Falkensammer F, Arnetzl GV, Wildburger A, Krall C, Freudenthaler J. Influence of different conditioning methods on immediate and delayed dentin sealing. J Prosthet Dent. 2014;112:204–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Eliyas S, Jalili J, Martin N. Restoration of the root canal treated tooth. Br Dent J. 2015;218:53–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Trabert KC, Caput AA, Abou-Rass M. Tooth fracture—a comparison of endodontic and restorative treatments. J Endod. 1978;4:341–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Saunders WP, Saunders EM. Coronal leakage as a cause of failure in root-canal therapy—a review. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1994;10:105–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent. 1984;51:780–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Fennis WM, Kuijs RH, Kreulen CM, Roeters FJ, Creugers NH, Burgersdijk RC. A survey of cusp fractures in a population of general dental practices. Int J Prosthodont. 2002;15:559–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Heling I, Gorfil C, Slutzky H, Kopolovic K, Zalkind M, Slutzky-Goldberg I. Endodontic failure caused by inadequate restorative procedures: review and treatment recommendations. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;87:674–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Reeh ES, Messer HH, Douglas WH. Reduction in tooth stiffness as a result of endodontic and restorative procedures. J Endod. 1989;15:512–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Mondelli J, Steagall L, Ishikiriama A, de Lima Navarro MF, Soares FB. Fracture strength of human teeth with cavity preparations. J Prosthet Dent. 1980;43:419–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Shinogaya T, Bakke M, Thomsen CE, Vilmann A, Matsumoto M. Bite force and occlusal load in healthy young subjects—a methodological study. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2000;8:11–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Randow K, Glantz PO. On cantilever loading of vital and non-vital teeth. An experimental clinical study. Acta Odontol Scand. 1986;44:271–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Evidence-based review of clinical studies on restorative dentistry. J Endod. 2009;35:1111–5.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Creugers NH, Kreulen CM, Fokkinga WA, Mentink AG. A 5-year prospective clinical study on core restorations without covering crowns. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18:40–1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18:34–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Palhais M, Sousa-Neto MD, Rached-Junior FJ, Amaral MC, Alfredo E, Miranda CE, et al. Influence of solvents on the bond strength of resin sealer to intraradicular dentin after retreatment. Braz Oral Res. 2017;31:e11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kuga MC, Faria G, Rossi MA, do Carmo Monteiro JC, Bonetti-Filho I, Berbert FL, et al. Persistence of epoxy-based sealer residues in dentin treated with different chemical removal protocols. Scanning. 2013;35:17–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Cagidiaco MC, Garcia-Godoy F, Vichi A, Grandini S, Goracci C, Ferrari M. Placement of fiber prefabricated or custom made posts affects the 3-year survival of endodontically treated premolars. Am J Dent. 2008;21:179–84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Moshonov J, Slutzky-Goldberg I, Gottlieh A, Peretz B. The effect of the distance between post and residual gutta-percha on the clinical outcome of endodontic treatment. J Endod. 2005;31:177–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Boksman L, Hepburn AB, Kogan E, De Rijk WG. Fiber post techniques for anatomical root variations. Dent Today. 2011;30:106–11.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Porciani PF, Vano M, Radovic I, Goracci C, Grandini S, Garcia-Godoy F, et al. Fracture resistance of fiber posts: combinations of several small posts vs standardized single post. Am J Dent. 2008;21:373–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Maceri F, Martignoni M, Vairo G. Mechanical behaviour of endodontic restorations with multiple prefabricated posts: a finite-element approach. J Biomech. 2007;40:2386–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Altmann AS, Leitune VC, Collares FM. Influence of eugenol-based sealers on push-out bond strength of Fiber post Luted with resin cement: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Endod. 2015;41:1418–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Lassila LV, Tanner J, Le Bell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater. 2004;20:29–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Balbosh A, Kern M. Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2006;95:218–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Albashaireh ZS, Ghazal M, Kern M. Effects of endodontic post surface treatment, dentin conditioning, and artificial aging on the retention of glass fiber-reinforced composite resin posts. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;103:31–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Radovic I, Monticelli F, Cury AH, Bertelli E, Vulicevic ZR, Ferrari M. Coupling of composite resin cements to quartz fiber posts: a comparison of industrial and chairside treatments of the post surface. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:57–66.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Durski MT, Metz MJ, Thompson JY, Mascarenhas AK, Crim GA, Vieira S, et al. Push-out bond strength evaluation of glass fiber posts with different resin cements and application techniques. Oper Dent. 2016;41:103–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Coniglio I, Magni E, Goracci C, Radovic I, Carvalho CA, Grandini S, et al. Post space cleaning using a new nickel titanium endodontic drill combined with different cleaning regimens. J Endod. 2008;34:83–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Akman M, Eldeniz AU, Ince S, Guneser MB. Push-out bond strength of a new post system after various post space treatments. Dent Mater J. 2016;35:876–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Elnaghy AM. Effect of QMix irrigant on bond strength of glass fibre posts to root dentine. Int Endod J. 2014;47:280–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Fawzy AS, Amer MA, El-Askary FS. Sodium hypochlorite as dentin pretreatment for etch-and-rinse single-bottle and two-step self-etching adhesives: atomic force microscope and tensile bond strength evaluation. J Adhes Dent. 2008;10:135–44.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. 3M ESPE cementing endodontic post. [cited 2017 March]. Available from: http://tinyurl.com/n5davgd.

  75. Vichi A, Grandini S, Ferrari M. Comparison between two clinical procedures for bonding fiber posts into a root canal: a microscopic investigation. J Endod. 2002;28:355–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Khayat A, Lee SJ, Torabinejad M. Human saliva penetration of coronally unsealed obturated root canals. J Endod. 1993;19:458–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Fox K, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro study of coronal microleakage in root-canal-treated teeth restored by the post and core technique. Int Endod J. 1997;30:361–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claire Field .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Field, C., Stone, S., Whitworth, J., Wassell, R. (2019). Core Build-Ups and Post Placement. In: Wassell, R., Nohl, F., Steele, J., Walls, A. (eds) Extra-Coronal Restorations. BDJ Clinician’s Guides. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79093-0_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-79093-0_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-79092-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-79093-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics