Advertisement

The Productivity Slowdown and the Secular Stagnation Hypothesis

Chapter
Part of the Financial and Monetary Policy Studies book series (FMPS, volume 46)

Abstract

The recent dismal productivity growth in the U.S. and in the global economy has been seen as evidence of a potential return to a period of secular stagnation. Focusing on the U.S.—a proxy for the frontier economy—we consider a standard decomposition of the different sources of post-World War II growth of GDP per capita, and review existing projections. In the next 20–50 years, lower contributions of hours worked and education will negatively affect U.S. economic growth. However, total factor productivity—which some warn will also continue to stagnate—will be key. After showing that similar warnings have been issued after all deep recessions, we argue that such pessimistic predictions were consistently misguided—not because they were built on erroneous theories or data, nor because they failed to predict the discovery of new technologies, but because they underestimated the potential of the technologies that already existed. These findings suggest that we should not make the same mistake today by undervaluing the future effects of current information technology.

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Autor D (2012) What does human capital do? A review of goldin and katz’s the race between education and technology. J Econ Lit 50:426–463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Acemoglu D, Laibson D, List JA (2014) Equalizing superstars: the internet and the democratization of education. NBER working paper, 19851Google Scholar
  3. Baily MN, Gordon RJ (1988) The productivity slowdown, measurement issues, and the explosion of computer power. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:347–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BIS (2014). Recent developments in the global economy. Bank for International Settlements, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  5. Brynjolfsson E, McAfee A (2014) The second machine age. Norton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne DM, Oliner SD, Sichel DE (2013) Is the information technology revolution over? Int Product Monit 25:20–36Google Scholar
  7. Byrne DM, Corrado C (2016) ICT Asset prices: marshaling evidence into new measures. The conference board working paper, vol 6Google Scholar
  8. Byrne DM, Fernald JG, Reinsdorf M (2017) Does growing mismeasurement explain disappointing growth? Economic letter, vol 4. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  9. Caselli F (2005) Accounting for cross-country income differences. In: Aghion P, Durlauf S (eds) Handbook of economic growth. Elsevier, North HollandGoogle Scholar
  10. Cowen T (2011) The great stagnation: how america ate all the low-hanging fruit of modern history, got sick, and will (Eventually) feel better. Dutton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  11. Crafts N (2002) The solow productivity paradox in historical perspective. CEPR discussion paper, vol 314Google Scholar
  12. David P (1990) The dynamo and the computer: an historical perspective on the modern productivity paradox. Am Econ Rev 80:355–361Google Scholar
  13. Eichengreen B (2014) Secular stagnation: a review of the issues. In: Teulings C, Baldwin R (eds) Secular stagnation: facts, causes and cures. Centre for Economic Policy Research, LondonGoogle Scholar
  14. Fernald JG (2014) A quarterly, utilization-adjusted series on total factor productivity. Working paper, vol 19. Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  15. Fernald JG (2015) Productivity and potential output before, during, and after the great recession. In: Parker JA, Woodford M (eds) NBER macroeconomics annual 2014. University of Chicago, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  16. Fernald JG, Jones CI (2014) The future of US economic growth. Am Econ Rev 104:44–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fernald JG, Hall RE, Stock JH, Watson MW (2017) The Disappointing recovery of output after 2009. Mimeo, Federal Reserve Bank of San FranciscoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Finicelli A, Pagano P, Sbracia M (2014) Trade-Revealed TFP. Mimeo, Bank of ItalyGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldin C, Katz LF (2008) The race between education and technology. Cambridge, BelknapGoogle Scholar
  20. Gordon RJ (1990) The measurement of durable goods prices. NBER, ChicagoCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gordon RJ (2012) Is US economic growth over? Faltering innovation confronts the six headwinds. NBER working paper, 18315Google Scholar
  22. Gordon RJ (2014) The demise of US economic growth: restatement, rebuttal, and reflections. NBER working paper, 19895Google Scholar
  23. Griliches Z (1990) Patent statistics as economic indicators: a survey. J Econ Lit 28:1661–1707Google Scholar
  24. Hansen AH (1936) Mr. Keynes on Underemployment Equilibrium. J Political Economy 44:667–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hansen AH (1938) Full Recovery or Stagnation?. Norton Company, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Hansen AH (1939) Economic Progress and Declining Population Growth. American Economic Review 29:1–15Google Scholar
  27. Heckman JJ, LaFontaine PA (2010) The American High School Graduation Rate: Trends and Levels. Review of Economics and Statistics 92:244–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jones CI (1995a) R&D-based models of economic growth. J Polit Econ 103:759–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jones CI (1995b) Time series tests of endogenous growth models. Q J Econ 110:495–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Jones CI (2002) Sources of US economic growth in a world of ideas. Am Econ Rev 92:220–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Jorgenson DW, Ho MS, Stiroh K (2005) Productivity: information technology and the american growth resurgence. MIT Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  32. Keynes JM (1937) Some economic consequences of a declining population. Eugen Rev 29:13–17Google Scholar
  33. Kortum S (1997) Research, patenting, and technological change. Econometrica 65:1389–1419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kremer M (1993) Population growth and technological change: one million BC to 1990. Q J Econ 108:681–716CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Krugman P (1990) The age of diminished expectations: US economic policy in the 1990s. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. Lindsey B (2013) Why growth is getting harder. Cato Institute, Policy Analysis, p 737Google Scholar
  37. Lucas RE Jr (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:3–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maddison A (2008) Statistics on world population, GDP and per capita GDP, 1-2006 AD. http://www.ggdc.net/maddison/oriindex.htm. Accessed 8 Nov 2017
  39. Meadows DH, Meadows DL, Randers J, Behrens WW (1972) The limits to growth. Universe Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  40. Merton RK (1935) Fluctuations in the rate of industrial invention. Q J Econ 49:454–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Mincer J (1958) Investment in human capital and personal income distribution. J Polit Econ 66:281–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mincer J (1974) Schooling, experience and earnings. National Bureau of Economic Research, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  43. Mokyr, J. (2013) Technology then and now: why the technopessimists are wrong. Presentation delivered at the Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta Public Affairs Forum, JulyGoogle Scholar
  44. Murnane RJ (2013) US high school graduation rates: patterns and explanations. J Econ Lit 51:370–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nasar S (2012) Grand Pursuit: The story of economic genius. Simon & Schuster, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. Nordhaus WD (1972) The recent productivity slowdown. Brook Pap Econ Act 3:493–536CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nordhaus WD (1992) Lethal model 2: the limits to growth revisited. Brook Pap Econ Act 2:2–43Google Scholar
  48. Nye DE (1990) Electrifying America: social meanings of a new technology. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  49. OECD (2014a) Long-term projections for the economic outlook. Organisation for economic co-operation and development, FebruaryGoogle Scholar
  50. OECD (2014b) Policy considerations in the current economic situation. Organisation for economic co-operation and development, JanuaryGoogle Scholar
  51. Pagano P, Sbracia M (2014) The secular stagnation hypothesis: a review of the debate and some insights. Occasional papers, vol 231. Bank of ItalyGoogle Scholar
  52. Samuelson PA (1939) Interactions between the multiplier analysis and the principle of acceleration. Rev Econ Stat 21:75–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Samuelson PA (1988) The keynes-hansen-samuelson multiplier-accelerator model of secular stagnation. Jpn World Econ 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strasser S (1982) Never done: a history of American housework. Pantheon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Summers, L. (2013) IMF economic forum: policy responses to crises. Speech delivered at the IMF annual research conference, 8th NovGoogle Scholar
  56. Sweezy A (1943) Secular stagnation? In: Harris SE (ed) Postwar economic problems. McGraw Hill, New York, LondonGoogle Scholar
  57. Temin P (2006) The economy of the early roman empire. J Econ Perspect 20:133–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vijg J (2011) The American technological challenge: stagnation and decline in the 21st Century. Algora, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  59. Wells DA (1891) Recent economic changes and their effect on production and distribution of wealth and well-being of society. Appleton, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  60. World Bank (2017) World development report 2018: learning to realize education’s promise. the World Bank, Washington DCGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bank of ItalyRomeItaly
  2. 2.World BankWashington DCUSA

Personalised recommendations