Advertisement

Intellectual Capital and Innovation for Sustainable Smart Cities: The Case of N-Tuple of Helices

  • Florinda MatosEmail author
  • Valter Vairinhos
  • Susanne Durst
  • Renata Paola Dameri
Chapter

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to explore and discuss, in the context of Smart Cities (SC), the relations between three concepts: Intellectual Capital (IC), Innovation Process (IP) and Sustainability (S). It is important to note that, in this context, the concept of IC refers to Smart Cities Intellectual Capital (SCIC), which is characterised by four components (Human Capital, Process Capital, Renewal Capital, Clients Capital), also used for Nations IC. The Innovation analysis considers two models: the first one expresses the dependencies and limits of innovation, resulting from physical limitations such as city area and city population; and the second one is the N-Tuple of Helices model. The concept of Smart City will be modelled as a living being capable of rational behaviour, knowledge production, and intellectual activity.

Keywords

Intellectual Capital Innovation Smart City Sustainability 

References

  1. Afgan, N. H., & Carvalho, M. G. (2010). The knowledge society: A sustainability paradigm. Cadmus. Promoting Leadership in Thought that Leads to Action, 1(1), 28–41.Google Scholar
  2. Albino, V., Berardi, U., & Dangelico, R. M. (2015). Smart cities: Definitions, dimensions, and performance. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arnkil, R., Järvensivu, A., Koski, P., & Piirainen, T. (2010). Exploring Quadruple Helix. Outlining user-oriented innovation models. Työraportteja. 85/2010 Working Papers.Google Scholar
  4. Berners-Lee, T., Cailliau, R., Groff, J. F., & Pollermann, B. (1992). World-wide web: The information universe. Electronic Network, 2(1), 52–58.Google Scholar
  5. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Helbing, D., Kühnert, C., & West, G. B. (2007). Growth, innovation, scaling, and the pace of life in cities. PNAS, 104(17), 7301–7306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bettencourt, L. M. A., Lobo, J., Strumsky, D., & West, G. B. (2010). Urban scaling and its deviations: Revealing the structure of wealth, innovation and crime across cities. PLoS One, 5(11), e13541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bounfour, A., & Edvinsson, L. (2005). Intellectual capital for communities nations, regions and cities. Berlington: Elsevier Butterworth.Google Scholar
  8. Brelsford, C., Lobo, J., Hand, J., & Bettencourt, L. M. (2017). Heterogeneity and scale of sustainable development in cities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 201606033.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carayannis, E. G., Barth, T. D., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). The Quintuple Helix innovation model: Global warming as a challenge and driver for innovation. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 1, 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cavallini, S., Soldi, R., Friedl, J., & Volpe, M. (2016). Using the quadruple Helix approach to accelerate the transfer of research and innovation results to regional growth. Consortium Progress Consulting Srl & Fondazione FORMIT. Retrieved October 29, 2017, from http://bit.ly/2zgInpZ
  11. Dameri, R. P. (2012, June). Defining an evaluation framework for digital cities implementation. In 2012 International Conference on Information Society (i-Society) (pp. 466–470). IEEE.Google Scholar
  12. Dameri, R. P. (2013). Searching for smart city definition: A comprehensive proposal. International Journal of Computers & Technology, 11(5), 2544–2551.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dameri, R. P., Negre, E., & Rosenthal-Sabroux, C. (2016, January). Triple Helix in Smart cities: A literature review about the vision of public bodies, universities, and private companies. In 2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), (pp. 2974–2982). IEEE.Google Scholar
  14. Dameri, R. P., & Ricciardi, F. (2015). Smart city intellectual capital: An emerging view of territorial systems innovation management. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 16(4), 860–887.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dameri, R. P., Ricciardi, F., & D’Auria, B. (2014). Knowledge and intellectual capital in smart city. Proceedings of the European Conference on Knowledge Management, ECKM (Vol. 1, pp. 250–257, 250).Google Scholar
  16. David, P. A., & Metcalfe, S. (2007). Universities and public research organisations in the ERA—Fulfilling universities’ critical societal roles in the advancement of knowledge and the support of sustained innovation-driven economic growth in Europe. 3rd Draft of the Report. Prepared for the 8th June 2007 Brussels Meeting of the EC (DG-Research) Expert Group on “Knowledge and Growth”. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/invest-in-research/pdf/download_en/metcalfe_report5.pdf
  17. Doel, M., & Hubbard, P. (2002). Taking world cities literally: Marketing the city in a global space of flows. City, 6, 351–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Durst, S., Edvardsson, I. R., & Bruns, G. (2015). Sustainable organizations and knowledge process outsourcing: Conditions for success. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 10(2), 110–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Edvardsson, I. R., & Durst, S. (2017). Universities and knowledge-based development: A literature review. International Journal of Knowledge-Based Development, 8(2), 105–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Edvinsson, L., & Malone, M. S. (1997). Intellectual capital: Realizing your company’s true value by finding its hidden brainpower. New York, NY: Harper Business Press.Google Scholar
  21. Egbu, C. O. (2004). Managing knowledge and intellectual capital for improved organizational innovations in the construction industry: An examination of critical success factors. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(5), 301–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Innovation in innovation: The Triple Helix of university-industry-government. Relations Social Science Information, 42(3), 293–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The Triple Helix: University-industry-government innovation in action. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of the university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29, 109–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. EU Parliament, ITRE Commission. (2014). Mapping smart cities in EU. Brussels.Google Scholar
  26. European Union. (2016). Urban Europe statistics on cities, towns and suburbs. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  27. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Milanović, P. N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities-ranking of European medium-size cities. Final Report. Centre of Regional Science (SRF) Vienna University of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.smart-cities.eu/why-smart-cities.html
  28. Hansen, M. T., & Birkinshaw, J. (2007). The innovation value chain. Harvard Business Review, 85(6), 121.Google Scholar
  29. Hislop, D. (2013). Knowledge management in organizations (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Pres.Google Scholar
  30. Isaacson, W. (2014). The innovators: How a group of inventors, hackers, geniuses and geeks created the digital revolution. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  31. Khazanchi, S., Lewis, M. W., & Boyer, K. K. (2007). Innovation-supportive culture: The impact of organizational values on process innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 25(4), 871–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Komninos, N. (2009). Intelligent cities: Towards interactive and global innovation environments. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 337–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kraus, S., Richter, C., Papagiannidis, S., & Durst, S. (2015). Innovating and exploiting entrepreneurial opportunities in smart cities: Evidence from Germany. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24, 601–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lawson, B., & Samson, D. (2001). Developing innovation capability in organizations: A dynamic capabilities approach. International Journal of Innovation Management, 5(03), 377–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lazaroiu, G. C., & Roscia, M. (2012). Definition methodology for the smart cities model. Energy, 47(1), 326–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The Triple-Helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18(2), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lin, C. Y.-Y., & Edvinsson, L. (2011). National intellectual capital: A comparison of 40 countries. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lobo, J., Bettencourt, L. M., Strumsky, D., & West, G. B. (2013). Urban scaling and the production function for cities. PLoS One, 8(3), e58407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149.Google Scholar
  40. López-Ruiz, V.-R., Alfaro-Navarro, J.-L., & Nevado-Peña, D. (2014). Knowledge-city index construction: An intellectual capital perspective. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(12), 5560–5572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Manville, C., Cochrane, G., Cave, J., Millard, J., Pederson, J. K., Thaarup, R. K., Liebe, A., Wissner, M., Massink, R., & Kotterink, B. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU. Brussels: European Parliament, Directorate-General for Internal Policies, Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy.Google Scholar
  42. Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6(1), 64–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Matos, F., & Vairinhos, V. (2016). Monitoring the Intellectual Capital of Cities. In Theory and Applications in the Knowledge Economy—TAKE 2016 (pp. 714–725).Google Scholar
  44. Matos, F., Vairinhos, V., & Osinski, M. (2017, September). Intellectual capital management as an indicator of sustainability. In European Conference on Knowledge Management (pp. 655–663). Academic Conferences International Limited.Google Scholar
  45. Matos, F., Vairinhos, V. M., Dameri, R. P., & Durst, S. (2017). Increasing smart city competitiveness and sustainability through managing structural capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 18(3), 693–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mintrom, M. (1997). Policy entrepreneurs and the diffusion of innovation. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 738–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Navarro, J. L. A., Ruiz, V. R. L., & Peña, D. N. (2012, April). A theoretical intellectual capital model applied to cities. In Proceedings of the European Conference on Intellectual Capital (pp. 17–25).Google Scholar
  49. Santa Fe Institute. (2017). Research project cities, scaling & sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.santafe.edu/research/projects/cities-scaling-sustainability
  50. Science for Environment Policy. (2015). Indicators for sustainable cities. In-depth Report 12. Produced for the European Commission DG Environment by the Science Communication Unit, UWE, Bristol. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/science-environment-policy
  51. Stewart, T. (1997). Intellectual capital—The new wealth of organizations. Bantam: Doubleday Dell Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  52. Subramaniam, M., & Youndt, M. A. (2005). The influence of intellectual capital on the types of innovative capabilities. Academy of Management Journal, 48(3), 450–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Tideman, S. G., Arts, M. C., & Zandee, D. P. (2013, March). Sustainable leadership. Towards a workable definition. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 2013, 17–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Tranos, E., & Gertner, D. (2012). Smart networked cities? Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 175–190.Google Scholar
  55. Trott, P. (2017). Innovation management and new product development (6th ed.). Pearson: Harlow.Google Scholar
  56. UNESCO. (2005). Towards knowledge societies. Paris.Google Scholar
  57. United Nations. (2007). Indicators of sustainable development: Guidelines and methodologies (3rd ed.). New York: United Nations.Google Scholar
  58. United Nations. (2016). The sustainable development agenda. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/
  59. Van Kleef, J. A. G., & Roome, N. J. (2007). Developing capabilities and competence for sustainable business management as innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(1), 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. West, G. B., Brown, J. H., & Enquist, B. J. (1997). A general model for the origin of allometric scaling laws in biology. Science, 276(5309), 122–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wiek, A., & Binder, C. (2005). Solution spaces for decision-making—A sustainability assessment tool for city-regions. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 25(6), 589–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. World Commission on Economic Development (WCED). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  63. Yigitcanlar, T., & Sarimin, M. (2011). The role of universities in building prosperous knowledge cities: The Malaysian experience. Built Environment, 37(3), 260–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Florinda Matos
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Valter Vairinhos
    • 1
    • 3
  • Susanne Durst
    • 4
  • Renata Paola Dameri
    • 5
  1. 1.ICLab, ICAA—Intellectual Capital AssociationSantarémPortugal
  2. 2.DINÂMIA’CET-IUL—ISCTE-IULLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.CINAV—Naval Research Centre Escola NavalAlmadaPortugal
  4. 4.School of BusinessUniversity of SkövdeSkövdeSweden
  5. 5.Department of Economics and Business StudiesUniversity of GenovaGenovaItaly

Personalised recommendations