The Development Path of WeChat: Social, Political and Ethical Challenges

  • Pi-Chi ChenEmail author
Part of the Palgrave Macmillan Asian Business Series book series (PAMABS)


China boasts the world’s largest social media market, which is vastly different from her Western counterparts. WeChat by Tencent, QQ and Weibo are at the forefront of the growing market—aiming to benefit from the surge in social media membership. Much of the focus, however, has been on examining and expanding their technological portfolio which further gives rise to a number of concerns. As WeChat continues to grow, politicians and dissidents alike are voicing their fears that security officials are able to track users’ everyday movements via the voice-messaging service that WeChat offers. As such, both users and the authorities alike deem WeChat as a brewing threat due to the possibility of surveillance—which perhaps explains why the frequency of WeChat-related crimes has greatly increased.

This research therefore focuses on the ramifications of WeChat’s growth on institutional policy and social development, alongside the ethical challenges that may arise. The trajectory of WeChat’s development will consequently be analysed—considering its early growth and the impact that governmental policies have had in shaping China’s social media evolution. Ultimately, the study endeavours to implicate the complexity of social media in China compared to the West—offering an alternative model to account for the changing power dynamics behind China’s digital business environment.


WeChat Social media market Tencent Social development Weibo 


  1. Alexander, D. (2013). Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Accessed 31 Jan 2018.
  2. Alexander, D. E. (2014). Social media in disaster risk reduction and crisis management. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 717–733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baidu Encyclopedia. (2015). WeChat public platform. 662.htm. Accessed 3 Aug 2017.
  4. Balana, C. D. (2012, June 15). Social media: Major tool in disaster response. Inquirer Technology. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
  5. BBC. (2017). Twitter user numbers overtaken by China’s Sina Weibo. Accessed 31 Aug 2017.
  6. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Castillo, C., Mendoza, M., & Poblete, B. (2011, 28 March–1 April 2011). Information credibility on Twitter. In Proceedings of the20th International Conference on World Wide Web, International World Wide Web Conference Committee, Hyderabad, pp. 675–684.Google Scholar
  9. Chaffee, S. H., & Metzger, M. J. (2001). The end of mass communication. Mass Communication & Society, 4(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen, Q., Xiaolin, X., Cao, B., & Zhang, W. (2016). Social media policies as responses for social media affordances: The case of China. Government Information Quarterly, 33(2), 313–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cheong, M., & Lee, V. C. S. (2011). A microblogging-based approach to terrorism informatics: Exploration and chronicling civilian sentiment and response to terrorism events via Twitter. Information Systems Frontiers, 13(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. China Internet Network Information Center (CNNIC). (2017, January). The 38th statistical report on internet development in China.Google Scholar
  13. Chiu, C., Ip, C., & Silverman, A. (2012, April). Understanding social media in China. McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 147–149.Google Scholar
  14. Chung, I. J. (2011). Social amplification of risk in the internet environment. Risk Analysis, 31(12), 1883–1896.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Citizen Lab. (2013, November 14). Asia chats: Analyzing information controls and privacy in Asian messaging applications. Accessed 3 Sept 2017.
  16. Collymore, B. (2010). Twitter and Facebook addictions work for Collymore. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
  17. comScore. (2017). 2017 US cross-platform future in focus. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
  18. Crampton, T. (2011). Social media in China: The same, but different. China Business Review, 1 January 2011. Accessed 15 Aug 2017.
  19. Custer, C. (2012, December 11). Tencent’s WeChat is a threat to everyone. Tech in Asia.Google Scholar
  20. Dai, Q. (1999). Guiding public opinion. Media Studies Journal, 13(1), 78–81.Google Scholar
  21. Denis-Remis, C., Lebraty, J. F., & Philippe, H. (2013). The 2008 anti-French demonstrations in China: Learning from a social media crisis. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 21(1), 45–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dwyer, T., & Xu, W. (2015, August 25). Tianjin disaster takes social news sharing to new levels in China. Accessed 3 Sept 2017.
  23. Facebook. (2017). Facebook reports fourth quarter and full year 2016 results. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
  24. Goolsby, R. (2009). Lifting elephants: Twitter and blogging in global perspective. In J. Salerno, S. J. Yang, D. Nau, & S. K. Chai (Eds.), Social computing, behavioural-cultural modelling, and prediction (Lecture Notes in Computer Science 6589, pp. 2–7). Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  25. Goolsby, R. (2010). Social media as crisis platform: The future of community maps/crisis maps. Association for Computing Machinery Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 1(1), Article No. 7, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Han, J. J. (2015). The research on WeChat public platforms applied in the libraries of universities: A case study of Project 211 universities. Research on Library Science, 11, 78–85.Google Scholar
  27. Hansen, D. L., Shneiderman, B., & Smith, M. A. (2011). Analyzing social media networks with NodeXL: Insights from a connected world. Burlington: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
  28. Harwit, E. (2016). WeChat: Social and political development of China’s dominant messaging APP. Chinese Journal of Communication, 10, 1–16.Google Scholar
  29. Hui, T. (2013). Research on WeChat according to communication study and its influence. Chongqing Social Sciences, 9(11), 61–66.Google Scholar
  30. Jennex, M. E. (2012). Social media-viable for crisis response? Experience from the great San Diego/Southwest blackout. International Journal of Information Systems for Crisis Response and Management, 4(2), 53–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53, 59–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kietzmann, J. H., Hermkens, K., McCarthy, I. P., & Silvestre, B. S. (2011). Social media? Get serious! Understanding the functional building blocks of social media. Business Horizons, 54(3), 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kozinets, R. V. (1999). E-tribalized marketing? The strategic implications of virtual communities of consumption. European Management Journal, 17(3), 252–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee, G., & Kwak, Y. H. (2012). An Open Government Maturity Model for social media-based public engagement. Government Information Quarterly, 29(4), 492–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lien, C. H., & Cao, Y. (2014). Examining WeChat users’ motivations, trust, attitudes, and positive word-of-mouth: Evidence from China. Computers in Human Behavior, 41, 104–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: Teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media & Society, 10(3), 393–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lundsay, J. (2010). Managing the workplace ethics of the social media. Accessed 15 Dec 2017.
  38. Meeker, M. (2016). The internet is slowing down, messaging is taking on the home screen, and voice search is big. In Code Conference 2016.
  39. Meijer, A., & Thaens, M. (2013). Social media strategies: Understanding the differences between North American police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 343–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mergel, I. (2013). A framework for interpreting social media interactions in the public sector. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 327–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nielson. (2012). State of the media: The social media report 2012. Accessed 30 Aug 2017.
  42. Oriedi, M. (2012, January 16). Social media, the new curse. The Sunday Standard.Google Scholar
  43. Phayul. (2013, October 17). WeChat leads to Tibetan woman’s arrest in Driru. Accessed 3 Sept 2017.
  44. Piller, F., Vossen, A., & Ihl, C. (2012). From social media to social product development: The impact of social media on co-creation of innovation. Die Unternehmung, 65(1), 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Qiang, X. (2010). The rise of online public opinion and its political impact. In S. L. Shirk (Ed.), Changing media, changing China (pp. 202–224). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Reuters. (2013, August 20). Now Vietnam wants to “manage” chat apps, and media says ban possible. Accessed 3 Sep 2017.
  47. Sharma, M. (2013, June 20). Indian government mulls WeChat ban. Accessed 3 Sept 2017.
  48. Tang, X., & Yang, C. (2012). Ranking user influence in healthcare social media. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology (TIST), 3(4), 73.Google Scholar
  49. Tencent. (2017). Company website. Accessed 1 Apr 2017.
  50. Turilli, M., & Florida, L. (2009). Cloud computing and its ethical challenges. Paper presented at CEPE, Milwaukee, 31 May – 3 June 2011.Google Scholar
  51. UNESCO. (2008). Ethical issues of information society. Accessed 30 Jan 2018.
  52. Vaast, E., & Kaganer, E. (2013). Social media affordances and governance in the workplace: An examination of organizational policies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(1), 78–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Vaccaro, A., & Madsen, P. (2009). Transparency: The new ICT-driven ethics? Ethics and Information Technology, 11(2), 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Wasike, J. (2013). Social media ethical issues: Role of a librarian. Library Hi Tech News, 30(1), 8–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. WeChat. (2018). Connecting a billion people with calls, chats and more. Retrieved from
  56. Wei, Q., & Yang, Y. (2017). WeChat library: A new mode of mobile library service. The Electronic Library, 35(1), 198–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wellman, B. (2001). Computer networks as social network. Science, 293, 2031–2034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xinhua. (2014, May 8). Info overload, fraud tarnish popular chat app.–05/08/content_17492115.htm. Accessed 1 Sep 2017.
  59. Xu, J., Kang, Q., Song, Z., & Clarke, C. P. (2015). Applications of mobile social media: WeChat among academic libraries in China. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 41(1), 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zhang, X., Wen, D., Liang, J., & Lei, J. (2017). How the public uses social media WeChat to obtain health information in China: A survey study. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 17(Suppl 2), 71–79.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Business SchoolUniversity of GreenwichLondonUK

Personalised recommendations